From: A systematic review of school meal nudge interventions to improve youth food behaviors
Criterion of Study Quality | Mean (SD) Observed Range | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Weak Studies (n = 9) | Moderate Studies (n = 17) | Strong Studies (n = 3) | Full Sample (n = 29) | |
1). Study Design: Was there a comparison group and were treatments randomized? | 1.22 (0.42) 1–2 | 2.53 (0.61) 1–3 | 2.67 (0.47) 2–3 | 2.14 (0.82) 1–3 |
2). Sampling Methods: Were schools and participants selected randomly or through convenience sampling? | 2.00 (0) 2 | 2.00 (0) 2 | 2.00 (0) 2 | 2.00 (0) 2 |
3). Data Collection Methods/Measurement Techniques: Were valid and reliable methods used to collect outcome data? | 2.56 (0.50) 2–3 | 2.53 (0.50) 2–3 | 3.00 (0) 3 | 2.59 (0.49) 2–3 |
4). Intervention Integrity Checks: Did the study include any announced or unannounced intervention integrity checks? | 1 (0) 1 | 1.35 (0.48) 1–2 | 2.33 (0.94) 1–3 | 1.34 (0.60) 1–3 |
5). Demographic Confounders Controlled for: Were relevant demographic confounders (gender, SES, race/ethnicity) controlled for in study design or analysis? | 1 (0) 1 | 2.12 (0.83) 1–3 | 3.00 (0) 3 | 1.86 (0.90) 1–3 |
6). Environmental/Systems Confounders: Were environmental/systems confounders controlled for in study design or the analysis? | 1.44 (0.50) 1–2 | 1.76 (0.73) 1–3 | 2.00 (0.82) 1–3 | 1.69 (0.70) 1–3 |
Total Study Quality Score (sum of items 1–6) | 9.22 (0.63) 8–10 | 12.29 (1.02) 11–14 | 15.00 (0) 15 | 11.62 (1.99) 8–15 |