Skip to main content

Table 2 Round two scoring of elements for inclusion in the PARS taxonomy

From: A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS)

Taxonomy element

Academic/Researcher (nā€‰=ā€‰16)

PARS provider/ commissioner (nā€‰=ā€‰12)

Both researcher and PARS provider (nā€‰=ā€‰6)

Public health or healthcare professional (nā€‰=ā€‰9)

All panellists (nā€‰=ā€‰43)

Median

IQR

Median

IQR

Median

IQR

Median

IQR

Median

IQR

LEVEL 1 PARS classification

ā€ƒ1a) Primary classification

9.5

8.3ā€“10.0

9.5

8.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.8ā€“10.0

10.0

6.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ1b) Provider

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

8.0

4.8ā€“9.8

10.0

8.8ā€“10.0

9.0

7.5ā€“9.5

9.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ1b) Setting

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

7.0

7.0ā€“8.0

10.0

8.8ā€“10.0

9.0

7.5ā€“9.5

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ1c) Conditions accepted (have or at risk of)

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

10.0

8.3ā€“10.0

10.0

8.8ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ1d) Activity type

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

9.5

7.0ā€“10.0

9.0

6.5ā€“10.0

9.0

8.0ā€“9.5

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ1e) Funding

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

7.0

5.0ā€“8.8

8.0

6.5ā€“9.3

9.0

5.5ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“10.0

LEVEL 2 Scheme characteristics

ā€ƒ2a) Staff structure

9.0

7.3ā€“10.0

8.5

3.5ā€“9.8

9.5

5.8ā€“10.0

8.0

4.5ā€“8.5

9.0

6.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2b) Staff qualifications

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2c) Behaviour change theories

9.0

6.3ā€“10.0

7.0

6.3ā€“9.5

10.0

8.8ā€“10.0

8.0

5.5ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2d) Behavioural change techniques

9.0

8.0ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.8ā€“10.0

8.0

5.0ā€“10.0

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2e) Referral source

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“10.0

9.5

7.8ā€“10.0

9.0

7.5ā€“10.0

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2f) Referrers

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“9.8

9.5

7.5ā€“10.0

9.0

6.5ā€“10.0

9.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2g) Referral process

9.5

6.5ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

8.0

4.5ā€“10.0

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2h) Scheme duration

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2i) Session frequency

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

9.0

5.5ā€“10.0

9.5

7.3ā€“10.0

9.0

8.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2j) Session length

10.0

7.5ā€“10.0

6.5

5.0ā€“7.8

9.5

5.3ā€“10.0

9.0

7.5ā€“9.5

9.0

6.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2k) Session time

8.0

5.0ā€“10.0

6.0

2.0ā€“7.0

7.0

5.3ā€“10.0

8.0

6.5ā€“9.0

7.0

5.0ā€“9.0

ā€ƒ2l) Session type

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

8.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

9.0

7.5ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2m) Equipment loana

5.0

3.3ā€“7.8

0.5

0.0ā€“5.0

6.0

4.5ā€“7.0

5.0

4.0ā€“7.0

5.0a

3.0ā€“7.0

ā€ƒ2n) Exit routes

9.5

9.0ā€“10.0

9.0

7.3ā€“10.0

9.5

7.0ā€“10.0

8.0

7.5ā€“10.0

9.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2o) Action in case of non-attendance

9.5

9.0ā€“10.0

8.5

4.3ā€“10.0

10.0

7.5ā€“10.0

8.0

7.5ā€“10.0

9.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2p) Baseline assessment

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

10.0

7.5ā€“10.0

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2q) Exit assessment

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

10.0

7.5ā€“10.0

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2r) Feedback provided to referrer

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

7.0

5.0ā€“9.8

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

8.0

7.5ā€“9.5

9.0

7.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ2s) Exclusion criteria

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

10.0

7.3ā€“10.0

9.5

7.8ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

LEVEL 3 Participant characteristics

ā€ƒ3a) Demographics

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

9.5

8.3ā€“10.0

10.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ3b) Number of referrals

10.0

9.3ā€“10.0

10.0

7.3ā€“10.0

9.5

7.8ā€“10.0

10.0

7.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ3c) Uptake, attendance and adherence

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

9.5

8.5ā€“10.0

10.0

8.0ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

ā€ƒ3d) Measures of Change

10.0

10.0ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

9.5

8.5ā€“10.0

10.0

8.5ā€“10.0

10.0

9.0ā€“10.0

  1. aExcluded from the final taxonomy