Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of individual and parental baseline characteristics among respondent and non-respondent participants

From: A pragmatic multi-setting lifestyle intervention to improve leisure-time physical activity from adolescence to young adulthood: the vital role of sex and intervention onset time

 

Non- respondersa

(n = 76)

Responders

(n = 1251)

P-value

Children characteristic

Age

15.43 ± 2.19

14.98 ± 1.94

0.47

Sex

  

0.81

  Boy

36 (47.4)

573 (45.8)

 

  Girl

40 (52.6)

678 (54.2)

 

Physical activity

  

0.10

  Low

25 (46.3)

287 (33.6)

 

  Moderate

10 (18.5)

255 (29.9)

 

  High

19 (35.2)

312 (36.5)

 

BMI Status

20.68 ± 4.97

20.78 ± 4.16

0.84

Fathers’ characteristics

Age

50.46 ± 6.50

49.43 ± 8.04

0.36

Physical activity

  

0.07

  Low

38 (73.1)

580 (61.2)

 

  Moderate

2 (3.8)

138 (14.6)

 

  High

12 (23.1)

130 (24.3)

 

BMI Status

  

0.002

  Normal

8 (15.1)

342 (36.0)

 

  Overweight

45 (84.9)

608 (64.0)

 

Education level

  

0.04

  Primary

28 (51.9)

347 (36.2)

 

  Secondary

22 (40.7)

465 (48.5)

 

  Higher

4 (7.4)

146 (15.2)

 

Employment status

  

0.21

  Unemployed

14 (25.9)

177 (18.4)

 

  Employed

40 (74.1)

786 (81.6)

 

Mothers’ characteristics

Age

42.18 ± 6.69

42.39 ± 6.90

0.81

Physical activity

  

0.24

  Low

47 (71.2)

716 (61.4)

 

  Moderate

7 (10.6)

136 (11.7)

 

  High

12 (18.2)

315 (27.0)

 

BMI Status

  

0.87

  Normal

11 (16.9)

216 (18.7)

 

  Overweight

54 (83.1)

941 (81.3)

 

Education level

  

0.35

  Primary

34 (51.5)

502 (46.6)

 

  Secondary

30 (45.5)

625 (53.1)

 

  Higher

2 (3.0)

51 (4.3)

 

Employment status

  

0.36

  Employed

3 (4.5)

98 (8.3)

 

  Unemployed

63 (95.5)

1083 (91.7)

 
  1. aAdolescents who did not come back at follow-ups.