Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics and summary of findings for studies including moderation or stratified analysis

From: Socioeconomic position, built environment and physical activity among children and adolescents: a systematic review of mediating and moderating effects

Authors (year), study

Study setting & study design

N & age & % girls

Assessment of built enviornment

Assessment of socioeconomic position

Outcome

Additional variables included in the statistical model

Type of analysis

Findings

Babey 2008 [50]

California Health Interview Survey

USA

Cross-sectional

4010

Age range: 12–17

% girls not stated

Perceived environment

Access to recreational facilities

Parental-reported income

Self-reported

Total physical activity

Age, sex, race/ethnicity, urbanicity, housing types, neighborhood safety

Formal test of interaction

No significant interaction. Models of regular activity and inactivity that tested interactions between access to a safe park and SEP were not significant.

→

Bringolf-Isler 2014 [24]

Pooled analysis of 7 Swiss studies

Switzerland

Cross-sectional

1742

Age range: 4–17

498% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Aesthetics

Safety

Area-level index

Accelerometery

Total physical activity

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Age, sex, season, accelerometer model, study-cluster, + moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for wear-time

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for total physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Associations between physical activity and accessibility were stronger in low SEP neighborhoods.

↑

Bringolf-Isler 2019 [25]

Swiss children’s Objectively measured Physical Activity (SPOHYA)

Switzerland

Cross-sectional

1306

Age range: 6-16

9% girls

Perceived environment

Safety

Access to recreational facilities

GIS

Accessibility

Safety

Aesthetics

Area-level index

Accelerometery

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Age, sex, household income, language region, urbanicity, individual SEP

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Associations between physical activity and accessibility were positive in low SEP areas, but negative in high SEP areas.

↑

Clennin 2019 [26]

Transitions and Activity Changes in Kids

USA.

Prospective

2 year of follow-up

660

Mean (SD) age: 10.6 (0.1)

4% girls

GIS

Access of recreational facilities

Area-level index.

Accelerometery

Total physical activity

Age, sex, race/ethnicity, parent education, and weight-status

Formal test of interaction

No significant interaction.

Access to recreational facilities did not moderate the association between deprivation and change in physical activity over two years.

→

da Silva 2018 [55]

Brazilian part of the International Physical Activity and Environment Network (IPEN) Study.

Brazil

Cross-sectional

495

Age range: 12–17 years

1% girls

Perceived environment

Safety

Parental-reported SEP Index

Self-reported Active transportation

Age, sex, perception of time spent to walk to school, leisure time moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, period spent in school + car ownership for analysis of parent reported built environment

Stratified analysis

Poisson regression showed largely similar weak associations with active transportation across SEP-categories for both adolescent and parent reported built environment.

→

De Meester 2012 [23]

Belgian Physical Activity study in Youth (BEPAS-Y)

Belgium

Cross-sectional

513

Mean (SD) age: 14.6 (0.9).

0% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Area-level household income

Accelerometry

Total physical activity

MVPA

Parental employment and educational attainment of mother and father, neighborhood-clustering

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and total physical activity. Accessibility was positively associated with physical activity among children living in low SEP neighborhoods only.

↑

D’Haese 2014 [22]

Belgian Physical Activity study in Children (BEPAS-Child)

Belgium

Cross-sectional

494

Mean (SD) age: 10.1 (0.9)

55% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Area-level household income

Self-reported

Active transportation

Accelerometry

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Age, sex, mother or father with college/university education

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for walking for transportation during leisure time. Accessibility was associated with more active transportation during leisure time among children living in low SEP neighborhoods only.

No interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and active transportation to school was found.

↑

Diaz 2019 [46]

No study name

Brazil

Cross-sectional

1130

Mean (SD) age: 16.5 (1.1)

3% girls

Perceived environment

Accessibility

Safety

Aesthetics

GIS

Accessibility

Self-report SEP index

Self-reported

Active transportation

Age, sex, SEP, class cluster

Stratified analysis

The associations between thirteen different built environment exposures and active transportation were largely similar and non-significant across SEP tertiles. Perceived land-use mix and perceived access to recreational facilities were associated with active commuting to school among adolescents in middle SEP tertile only.

→.

Hunter 2020 [39]

Recording and Evaluating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP)

Australia

Cross-sectional

1212

Mean (SD) age: 8.5 (3.6).

483% girls

Perceived environment

Accessibility

Access to recreational facilities

Area-level index

Parental reported

Total physical activity

Sex, typical behaviour of child during last 7 days, park recruitment area, year of data-collection

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for total physical activity. Park quality was positively associated with physical activity among children living in high SEP neighborhoods, but not in low and medium SEP neighborhoods.

↓

Isgor 2011 [47]

Child Development Supplement of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Study

USA

Cross-sectional

634

Mean (SD) age: 15.8 (1.22)

506% girls

GIS

Access to recreational facilities

Self-reported family income

Self-report

Total physical activity

Age, sex, ethnicity, marital status of family head, mother’s education, mother’s work status, zip-code level urbanization, zip-code level median household income

Stratified analysis.

No significant difference by SEP in the association between facility availability and PA among male adolescents.

Statistically significant differences by SEP in the associations between facility availability and physical activity among female adolescents. Additional facilities being more important in low SEP but no impact in high SEP.

↑

Johanson 2012 [51]

Health Behaviour in School-aged Children + Stockholm county

Sweden

Cross-sectional

5423

5th − 9th grade

50% girls

Perceived environment Accessibility

Self-reported employment type

Self-report

Active transportation

Car ownership

Stratified analysis.

In urban areas, children of low SEP were more likely to use active transportation compared with children of high SEP.

In rural areas, only children of self-employed persons (including farmers) were less likely to use active commuting compared to those of intermediate- to high-level salaried employees.

↑

Kerr 2006 [52]

Neighborhood Quality of Life Study

USA

Cross-sectional

259

Mean (SD) age 11.3 (4)

486% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Area-level household income

Parental reported

Active transportation

Sex and age

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for active transportation. In low-walkability neighborhoods, income was not related to active transportation. In high-walkability neighborhoods, children in high-income neighborhoods were more likely to actively commute.

↓

Kim 2020 [53]

Healthy Communities Study

USA

Cross-sectional

4114

Age range: 4–15

50% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Parental reported household income

Self-report

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Age, sex, race/ethnicity, parent education, neighborhood SEP history

Stratified analysis

No significant difference by SEP in the association between urbanicity and PA among children.

→

Liu 2008 [54]

National Survey of Children’s Health

USA

Cross-sectional

44,631

Age range: 10-17

49% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Parental reported family poverty status

Parental reported

Total physical activity

Age, sex, race/ethnicity,

overall health status, screen time, household poverty status/ parental education (mutual adjustment), number of children in household, parental physical activity, Perceived neighborhood safety

Stratified analysis

No consistent and meaningful difference by SEP was observed in the association between urbanicity and PA among children.

→

McCrorie 2020 [28]

Studying Physical Activity in Children’s Environments across Scotland

Scotland

Cross-sectional

774

Mean (SD) age: 11.1 (0.3)

53% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Household income

Accelerometry

Total physical activity,

Light intensity physical activity

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Sex, wear-time, number of valid days, season, distance to school, data zone walkability

Formal test of interaction

No significant interaction. The relationship between urban/rural settlement did not vary by household income quintile.

→

Molina-Garcia 2017 [40]

International Physical Activity and Environment Network (Spain)

Spain

Cross-sectional

310

Mean (SD) age: 11.2 (0.5).

49% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Parental reported education

Self-report

Active transportation

Unclear as variables removed if p > 0.15. Considered variables are age, gender, weight-status, adult accompaniment to school, number of motor-vehicles per licensed driver, distance to school, environmental/safety and planning (psychosocial barriers, participant clustering within neighborhoods

Formal test of interaction

No significant interaction. Socioeconomic position did not influence the strength of association between the built environment and physical activity.

→

Molina-Garcia 2017

[48]

International Physical Activity and Environment Network (Spain)

Spain

Cross-sectional

325

Mean (SD) age: 16.4 (0.8)

542% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Parental reported education

Accelerometry

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Self-report

Active transportation

Unclear as variables removed if p > 0.15. Considered variables are age, gender, days per week living at primary address, distance to school, driver license, number of children < 18 years old living at household, number of motor vehicles per licensed driver, number of years living at current address, and workout equipment in or around home, participant clustering within neighborhoods

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during weekends. In low-walkable neighborhoods, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during weekends were higher with among low SEP children, while in high-walkable neighborhoods, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during weekends were higher in high SEP.

↓

Oyeyemi 2014 [49]

No study name

Nigeria

Cross-sectional

1006

Mean (SD) age: 15.6 (1.7)

50% girls

Perceived environment

Accessibility

Access to recreational facilities

Safety

Aesthetics

Area-level income

Self-report

Active transportation

Age, sex, school grade, parental education and occupation, all BE factors

Formal test of interaction

No significant interaction. Neighborhood income did not influence the associations of environmental perception and active transportation. Significant interaction is observed for leisure time in boys, however, as leisure time is restricted to sports participation, we have chosen to disregard this association.

→

Page 2010 [41]

Personal and Environmental Associations with Children’s Health

England

Cross-sectional

1300

Age (range): 10-11

49% girls

Perceived environment

Accessibility

Safety

Aesthetics

Area-level deprivation

Self-report

Active transportation

Sex, daylight hours, pubertal stage, BMI, school clustering

Formal test of interaction

No significant interaction between neighborhood deprivation and accessibility in the association with active transportation (results not shown).

→

Rodrigues 2018 [42]

No study name

Portugal

Cross-sectional

834

Mean (SD) age: 8.1 (1.2).

49% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Parental reported education

Self-report

Active transportation

Bivariate: none, Multivariable: not applied

for relevant variables in boys( SEP not < 0.05 in bivariate model). Girls: age, sex, obesity, abdominal obesity, perceived safety, facilities close to home, distance to school, mother’s transportation, father’s transportation

Stratified analyses

No association between SEP and

active transportation in urban setting. Bivariate analysis shows higher odds of active transportation with low SEP in rural setting. The association is attenuated after multivariable adjustment.

→

Sallis 2018 [29]

Teen Environment

and Neighborhood Study

USA

Cross-sectional

928

Mean (SD) age: 14.1 (1.4)

50.4% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Area-level median household income

Accelerometery

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Self-report

Active transportation

Potential variables were (removed if p > 0.15): age, sex, race/ethnicity,

has driver’s license, attends school away from home, days/week living at current address, works outside the home, number of children in household, number of motor vehicles per licensed driver, years at current address, walkability-related reasons for moving here, study site, census block clustering (+ for accelerometry: acc model and wear-time)

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for active transportation to school. In low walkable areas, low SEP children had higher prevalence of active transportation than high income children. No difference in active transportation between low and high SEP in high walkable areas.

No significant interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

↓

Shams-White 2021 [30]

Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health and Eating Study

USA

Cross-sectional

1295

Age range: 12-17

50.4% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Area-level index

Self-report

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Age, gender, ethnicity, parent education,

neighborhood urban/rural location

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Strongest association between built environment and physical activity in middle SEP. No association with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in lowest and highest SEP (Q2-Q4 have slopes)

→

Stone 2014 [43]

Project BEAT

Canada

Cross-sectional

856

Mean (SD) age: 11.0 (0.6).

55% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Area-level

median household income

Accelerometry

Total physical activity Light intensity physical activity

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

None

Stratified analysis

Main effect of SEP-built environment combination for weekday total, MVPA and LPA in boys and girls are presented. These are further stratified by independent mobility, precluding a clear interpretation of the results.

→

Su 2013 [44]

Southern

California Children’s Health Study

USA

Cross-sectional

4338

Mean (SD) age: 6.6 (0.7)

48.2% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Parental reported education

Parental reported

Active transportation

Age, sex, ethnicity, distance to school, traffic density,

percent government and institutional, percent free and reduced-price meals program

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for active transportation. Accessibility associated with more frequent active transportation among high SEP children only.

↓

Uys 2016 [45]

The International Study og Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (South Africa)

South Africa

Cross-sectional

258

Mean (SD) age: 10.2 (0.6).

59% girls

GIS

Access to recreational facilities

Perceived environment

Access to recreational facilities

Safety

Self-reported

household income

Accelerometery

Total physical activity

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Age, sex

Formal test of interaction

Significant interaction for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Physical activity facilities positively associated with physical activity in low SEP children, but not in high SEP children. High traffic risk was associated with less activity among low SEP children, but not in high SEP children.

↑

Uzochukwu 2017 [56]

National

Survey of Children’s Health

USA

Cross-sectional

25,092

Mean (SD) age: 13.6

range (10–17)

48% girls

GIS

Accessibility

Perceived environment

Accessibility

Aesthetics

Parental reported household income

Parental reported

Total physical activity

Race/ethnicity, SEP, physical amenities,

social cohesion, physical detractions, social detractions.

Stratified analysis

Formal test of interaction

Stratified analysis suggested stronger correlation between SEP and physical activity in rural areas.

No significant interaction.

→

  1. SEP Socioeconomic position, SD Standard deviation, GIS Geographical information systems, → = no interaction, ↑ = significant interaction in favor of low SEP, ↓ = significant interaction in favor of high SEP