Skip to main content

Combined effects of continuous exercise and intermittent active interruptions to prolonged sitting on postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides in adults with obesity: a randomized crossover trial



Postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglyceride metabolism is impaired by prolonged sitting, but enhanced by exercise. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a continuous exercise bout with and without intermittent active interruptions to prolonged sitting on postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides.


Sedentary adults who were overweight to obese (n = 67; mean age 67 yr SD ± 7; BMI 31.2 kg∙m− 2 SD ± 4.1), completed three conditions: SIT: uninterrupted sitting (8-h, control); EX+SIT: sitting (1-h), moderate-intensity walking (30-min), uninterrupted sitting (6.5-h); EX+BR: sitting (1-h), moderate-intensity walking (30- min), sitting interrupted every 30-min with 3-min of light-intensity walking (6.5 h). Participants consumed standardized breakfast and lunch meals and blood was sampled at 13 time-points.


When compared to SIT, EX+SIT increased total area under the curve (tAUC) for glucose by 2% [0.1–4.1%] and EX+BR by 3% [0.6–4.7%] (all p < 0.05). Compared to SIT, EX+SIT reduced insulin and insulin:glucose ratio tAUC by 18% [11–22%] and 21% [8–33%], respectively; and EX+BR reduced values by 25% [19–31%] and 28% [15–38%], respectively (all p < 0.001 vs SIT, all p < 0.05 EX+SIT-vs-EX+BR). Compared to SIT, EX+BR reduced triglyceride tAUC by 6% [1–10%] (p = 0.01 vs SIT), and compared to EX+SIT, EX+BR reduced this value by 5% [0.1–8.8%] (p = 0.047 vs EX+SIT). The magnitude of reduction in insulin tAUC from SIT-to-EX+BR was greater in those with increased basal insulin resistance. No reduction in triglyceride tAUC from SIT-to-EX+BR was apparent in those with high fasting triglycerides.


Additional reductions in postprandial insulin-glucose dynamics and triglycerides may be achieved by combining exercise with breaks in sitting. Relative to uninterrupted sitting, this strategy may reduce postprandial insulin more in those with high basal insulin resistance, but those with high fasting triglycerides may be resistant to such intervention-induced reductions in triglycerides.

Trial registration

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000737639).


Population ageing and rising obesity rates are placing people at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease [1, 2]. While exercise can be an effective strategy for reducing key cardiovascular risk factors including postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides [3, 4], it’s unclear how these benefits may be modified by sedentary behavior, which is highly prevalent among older adults. Objective measurements indicate that older adults (> 60 years) spend 65–80% of their waking day in sedentary behavior (i.e. sitting) [5]. It is possible that excessive time spent sedentary may attenuate some of the benefits of exercising [6].

Both total sedentary time and sedentary bout duration have been prospectively associated with increased mortality after adjustment for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [7]. In experimental studies, prolonged periods of sitting induce greater postprandial rises in glucose, insulin, and triglycerides, relative to when sitting is interrupted with brief bouts of physical activity (typically 2–3 min every half hour) [8, 9]. Increases in these postprandial markers can promote lipid and glucose storage [10, 11], increase adhesion molecule expression and elevate oxidative stress [12], and have been prospectively associated with the development of T2D and cardiovascular disease [13,14,15]. Indeed, prolonged sitting is now recognized as a distinct behavioral consideration for postprandial markers of cardiometabolic risk [16].

To date, many experimental studies have compared the separate effects of continuous exercise, prolonged sitting, or regular interruptions to sitting on postprandial metabolic responses [17]. However, the combined effects of these behavioral approaches are also of interest since they often co-exist in a free-living setting. Homer et al. found that several hours of prolonged sitting followed by a 30-min bout of exercise in the afternoon, lowered postprandial insulin the following day during a period of prolonged sitting [18]. Interestingly, this effect was magnified when the exercise was combined with active interruptions to sitting. However, it is unclear whether the benefits of a morning bout of exercise are attenuated by subsequent exposure to prolonged sitting on the same day.

From a practical perspective, and in recognition of circadian variation in the metabolic responses to food intake and exercise [19, 20], there is a need for more research to investigate different patterns and combinations of prolonged sitting, interruptions to sitting, and continuous exercise on postprandial metabolism. In the current study, we examined the effect of a morning bout of moderate-intensity exercise with and without subsequent light-intensity interruptions to sitting, on postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides in older adults who were overweight to obese. In addition, we performed secondary analyses to determine whether the degree of underlying insulin resistance and hyperlipidaemia predicted responses. We hypothesised that combining an exercise bout with active interruptions to prolonged sitting would lead to greater reductions in postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides, than exercise following by prolonged sitting, or prolonged sitting with no exercise. In addition, we hypothesised that the magnitude of reduction in these postprandial markers would be predicted by the degree of underlying insulin resistance and fasting triglycerides.



Men and postmenopausal women (≥55 to ≤80 years; body mass index ≥25 kg·m− 2 to < 45 kg·m− 2) were recruited from the local community and tested at two sites: the Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia; and, the Human Cardiovascular Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia Perth, Australia. Ethical approval was obtained from The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (181–14) and The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (RA/4/1/6990). Recruitment occurred between February 2015 and July 2017. Participants gave informed consent prior to taking part. The outcomes reported here are pre-specified secondary outcomes of a randomized crossover trial (ACTRN12614000737639), and the detailed methods, rationale, and design sections have been published independently [21]. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram (CONSORT) flow diagram is presented in Fig. 1, and the CONSORT checklist is provided as an additional file (see Additional File 1). The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist is also provided (see Additional File 2). Full inclusion/exclusion criteria, and medication use, are provided as additional files (see Additional Files 3 and 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram

Study design

Participants completed three conditions, in random order, with a washout period of 6 to 13 days between them: SIT: uninterrupted sitting (8-h, control); EX+SIT: sitting (1-h), moderate-intensity walking (30-min), uninterrupted sitting (6.5-h); EX+BR: sitting (1-h), moderate-intensity walking (30-min), sitting interrupted every 30-min with 3-min of light-intensity walking (6.5-h). A familiarization session was completed 3 to 5 days prior to testing, where participants were familiarized with treadmill walking. During the 48-h prior to testing, participants were instructed to avoid caffeine, alcohol and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Food was controlled from the night before testing where participants consumed a standardized dinner at home between 7 PM and 9 PM in place of their regular dinner. This meal was tailored for each participant to provide 33% of estimated daily energy requirements with a macronutrient profile of 55–58% carbohydrate, 29–31% fat and 12–15% protein as previously described [21].


The morning exercise performed in EX+SIT and EX+BR was a 30-min bout of moderate-intensity walking. The speed was set at 3.2 km∙h− 1 which was a walking pace for all participants, and the incline was tailored to induce a heart rate (HR) response indicative of moderate-intensity (HR between 65 and 75% of age predicted maximum HR). This incline was determined during the familiarization session. The three-minute light-intensity walking breaks were 3.2 km∙h− 1 with no incline for all participants. Heart rate (Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE scale 6–20; light intensity 9–11 RPE; moderate-intensity 12–15 RPE) were collected at 5-min intervals during the 30-min bout of exercise and at the end of each three-minute walking break. Participants were instructed to avoid getting out of the chair except to void, or to complete the predetermined treadmill walking in EX+SIT and EX+BR.

Experimental day protocol

Participants reported to the laboratory at 7 AM, following an overnight fast (> 10-h) and an indwelling cannula was inserted into an antecubital vein. The experiment began at ~ 8 AM with a 1-h steady state sitting period where a fasting blood sample was obtained prior to administration of a standardized breakfast meal; mean protein 30.3 g (SD 5.1); fat 25.6 g (SD 3.3); carbohydrate 109.1 g (SD 17.3). Lunch was consumed four hours after breakfast; mean protein 25.0 g (SD 2.6); fat 29.6 g (SD 3.4), carbohydrate 97.4 g (SD 19.7). Participants were allocated 20-min to consume breakfast and lunch, which were standardized in a manner identical to the standardized dinner. All meals remained the same for a given participant throughout the study. After breakfast, the protocol was followed according to randomization (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental design. Participants completed three conditions in a random order separated by a minimum of six days: sitting (SIT): uninterrupted sitting (8-h, control); exercise+sitting (EX+SIT): sitting (1-h), moderate-intensity walking (30-min, denoted by walking figure) followed by uninterrupted sitting (6.5-h); exercise+breaks (EX+BR): sitting (1-h), moderate-intensity walking (30-min) followed by sitting (6.5-h) interrupted every 30-min with 3-min of light-intensity walking. Walking breaks are denoted by dashed lines in the EX+BR condition

Biochemical analysis

Haematocrit and haemoglobin were determined from whole blood using a Beckman Coulter LH 785 according to standard methods, to calculate percent change in plasma volume from pre to post each condition. Coded samples were sent to an independent National Association of Testing Authorities/The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia accredited laboratory on the day of testing for the determination of glucose and triglycerides. Blood was collected into fluoride/oxalate tubes for analysis of plasma glucose using the hexokinase method. Blood was collected into lithium heparin tubes for analysis of triglycerides using a COBAS Integra 400 + analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Serum was collected for the analysis of insulin. Serum samples coagulated for 1-h at room temperature (22–24 °C) prior to centrifuging at 2000 rpm (931 x g) for 15-min at 4 °C. Supernatants were removed and frozen immediately at − 20 °C and subsequently moved to a − 80 °C freezer at the end of the condition. Insulin was analysed from thawed samples using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Architect ci16200; Abbott Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA) with all samples from each participant analyzed in the same batch.

Statistical analysis

Sample size calculations for this study were performed in relation to the pre-specified primary outcome of this trial (cognitive function), and the details of this have previously been reported [21]. The order of conditions was block-randomized and stratified by sex by an independent third party using a computer-generated random sequence and stored in sealed envelopes. Researchers were unblinded to the order of conditions when familiarization was complete, and participants were unblinded to the condition after the 1-h steady-state period for experimental visits 1 and 2. Postprandial glucose, insulin and triglycerides were summarized over the 8-h period as total area under the curve (tAUC) and positive incremental area under the curve (iAUC). Specifically, tAUC and iAUC represent the total area above a baseline of zero and the incremental area above a baseline of fasting, respectively, calculated using the trapezoidal method. Skewed variables were transformed by natural logarithm prior to analysis. Skewed variables are also presented in Table 1 as median and interquartile range, and normally distributed variables are presented as mean and standard deviation. Following recommendations on data analysis for cross-over trials [23], linear mixed models with random intercepts were used to test the effect of the condition on each outcome. A time-by-condition interaction term was included in regression models to examine the effect of time course on the conditions. The time course was plotted using back-transformed marginal means. Back-transformed marginal means were calculated by exponentiation of model output. Models were adjusted for potential confounders including age, sex, waist circumference, treatment order, testing site, baseline values and change in plasma volume calculated from haematocrit and haemoglobin using the Dill and Costill method [24]. The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2) was used to calculate surrogate indices of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) and β-cell function (HOMA2-%β) from fasting values of glucose and insulin on the morning of each condition. The average value across three conditions was obtained for HOMA2-IR, HOMA2-%β and fasting triglycerides, and these average values were examined as predictors of intervention-induced change in tAUC. Intervention-induced change in tAUC was calculated for each comparison as SIT minus EX+SIT, SIT minus EX+BR and EX+SIT minus EX+BR. Linear, quadratic and cubic relationships between each predictor variable (centered around its mean) and each dependent variable (i.e. intervention-induced change) were investigated using appropriate polynomial terms entered in mixed models, controlling for potential confounders. The best fitting polynomial equation was used to plot significant associations of the predictor variables with intervention-induced change in the dependent variables. A probability level of 0.05 was adopted. Statistical analyses were performed blinded to the study conditions using Stata 15 (StataCorp LP).

Table 1 Participant characteristics


A total of 301 individuals were telephone screened, 81 individuals were invited to have a blood test performed and 75 individuals were invited to take part in the familiarization session. Following familiarization, 69 participants were randomized. Due to dropout, 67 completed at least one condition and 65 completed all conditions. Analysis was performed on the 67 participants who completed at least one condition. Participants (35 females, 32 males) were older adults, 67 years (SD 7), and were overweight to obese, 31.1 kg∙m− 2 (SD 4.1). A small proportion (16%) were classified as having impaired fasting glucose (5.6 mmol∙L− 1 to 6.9 mmol∙L− 1) based on current recommendations [25]. Participant characteristics are displayed in Table 1.

Exercise responses

The initial 30-min exercise bout induced identical HR and RPE responses between exercise conditions (mean ± SD); EX+SIT and EX+BR: 109 bpm (SD 12), 71%HRmax (SD 8), 11 RPE (SD 2). Average HR and RPE (6–20 scale) across all 12 walking breaks in EX+BR was 94 bpm (SD 2), 61%HRmax (SD 1) and 9 RPE (SD 0.4).

Postprandial responses

There was a small increase in glucose tAUC [95% CI] in EX+SIT 2% [0.1–4.1%, p = 0.04] and EX+BR 3% [0.6–4.7%, p = 0.01] relative to SIT (Fig. 3e). Relative to SIT, insulin tAUC (back-transformed; pmol·hr.·L− 1) was decreased by 18% [11–22%, p < 0.001] in EX+SIT and by 25% [19–31%, p < 0.001] in EX+BR. Insulin tAUC decreased by 9% [3–20%, p = 0.02] in EX+BR relative to EX+SIT (Fig. 3f). Relative to SIT, the insulin-to-glucose ratio (tAUC) decreased by 21% [8–33%, p < 0.001] in EX+SIT and by 28% [15–38%, p < 0.001] in EX+BR. Insulin-to-glucose ratio tAUC decreased by 8% [1–14%, p = 0.03] in EX+BR relative to EX+SIT (Fig. 3g). Triglyceride tAUC was reduced by 6% [1–10%, p = 0.01] in EX+BR relative to SIT and was reduced by 5% [0.1–8.8%, p = 0.047] in EX+BR relative to EX+SIT (Fig. 3h). Meal-specific responses are displayed as incremental area under the curve (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Postprandial glucose, insulin, insulin:glucose ratio and triglycerides. Panels a-d represent glucose, insulin, insulin:glucose ratio and triglycerides, respectively, displayed as a time course over 8-h. The shaded area represents the timing of the moderate-intensity exercise bout performed in exercise+sitting (EX+SIT) and exercise+breaks (EX+BR). Panels e-h represent glucose, insulin, insulin:glucose ratio and triglycerides, respectively, displayed as the total area under the curve (tAUC). For EX+SIT and EX+BR, the percentage change relative to sitting (SIT) is displayed within the bar. Data are marginal means and SEM, adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, baseline values, change in plasma volume, testing site and treatment order. * P < 0.05 SIT vs EX+BR; # P < 0.05 SIT vs EX+SIT

Fig. 4
figure 4

Meal-specific incremental area under the curve. Panels a-d represent the meal-specific insulin, glucose, insulin:glucose ratio, and triglyceride response, respectively, displayed as the positive incremental area under the curve (iAUC). The breakfast response represents the increase above the pre-breakfast time point until the pre-lunch time point. The lunch response represents the increase above the pre-lunch time point until the final time point. For EX+SIT and EX+BR, the change relative to sitting (SIT) is displayed within the bar. Data are marginal means and SEM, adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, baseline values, change in plasma volume, testing site and treatment order

Predictors of intervention-induced change

Insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) and beta cell function (HOMA2-%β) were both associated with intervention-induced change in insulin tAUC between SIT and EX+BR (Fig. 5a, b). These were positive quadratic (J-shaped) associations, suggesting that those with high basal insulin resistance or β-cell function had a larger magnitude of reduction in insulin tAUC between SIT and EX+BR. Fasting triglyceride concentration was associated with the magnitude of change in triglyceride tAUC between SIT and EX+BR (Fig. 5c). This was a negative quadratic association (inverted J-shape), suggesting that those with high fasting triglycerides were resistant to the intervention-induced reductions in triglyceride tAUC. None of the cubic regression coefficients were significant and differences in tAUC between SIT vs. EX+SIT or EX+SIT vs. EX+BR were not significantly associated to any of the baseline measures.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Associations between intervention-induced change and fasting baseline variables. Panels A-C represent the curvilinear relationships between intervention-induced change in insulin tAUC and HOMA2-IR, insulin tAUC and HOMA2-%β, triglyceride tAUC and fasting triglycerides, respectively. Fasting baseline variables were taken as the average across three conditions. The curved black line represents the line of best fit, calculated from a mixed model controlling for age, sex, waist circumference, change in plasma volume, testing site and treatment order. The shaded area represents the 95% confidence bands; ln indicates natural logarithm


This study demonstrates that post-exercise reductions in postprandial insulin and triglycerides are amplified by the addition of physically-active interruptions to prolonged sitting. This represents an opportunity to optimize current exercise strategies to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and T2D in older adults who are overweight to obese.

Postprandial glucose and insulin responses

Previous studies in adults have demonstrated reduced postprandial glucose and insulin levels when sitting is interrupted with intermittent bouts of light-intensity activity [17]. In 19 middle-aged adults (mean ± SD age 53.8 ± 4.9 years; BMI: 31.2 ± 4.1 kg/m2) who were physically inactive and sedentary, our group observed reductions of approximately 25 and 23% in the 5-h iAUC for glucose and insulin, respectively, when sitting was interrupted with short light-intensity walking breaks every 30-min [26]. In 70 adults (mean ± SD 25.9 ± 5.3 years; BMI: 23.6 ± 4.0 kg/m2) who were physically inactive, Peddie et al. demonstrated an approximate 39, and 26% reduction in the 9-h iAUC for glucose and insulin, respectively, when sitting was interrupted with short moderate-intensity walking breaks every 30-min [27]. In the current study of older adults who were overweight to obese, small increases in glucose tAUC of 2 and 3% were observed during EX+SIT and EX+BR, respectively. While the intermittent light-intensity activity breaks in the current study could be expected to reduce postprandial glucose due to contraction-mediated glucose uptake [28], the antecedent bout of moderate intensity exercise would be expected to increase hepatic glucose production even in the postprandial state [29, 30].

Similar to the current study, Peddie et al. also included a condition where a 30-min bout of exercise was followed by prolonged sitting [27]. Interestingly, a small increase in the glucose time course during the exercise period was observed [27]. However, this increase was not sustained and the exercise condition resulted in a non-significant decline of ~ 3% in the 9-h glucose iAUC compared to prolonged sitting [27]. Key differences with the current study population are that Peddie et al. included younger participants with a healthier metabolic profile. Other studies that have observed sustained but non-significant increases in glucose following a single exercise bout have included participants who were older, overweight, or with impaired fasting glucose [31,32,33]. This may partly explain why we observed small but sustained increases in glucose following exercise in our population of older adults, who were overweight/obese, and where some (16%) had impaired fasting glucose.

The observed increases in glucose in the current study equate to an approximate 0.2 mmol∙L− 1 increase in average glucose over 8-h in the exercise conditions relative to SIT. Such increases are important for muscle substrate provision, but unlikely to have adverse clinical consequences [34]. These small increases in glucose should be considered alongside the concurrent and large decreases in insulin tAUC of 18 and 25% during EX+SIT and EX+BR, respectively. Our meal-specific analysis also revealed an interesting pattern whereby the large reductions in insulin occurred mostly following morning exercise in the post-breakfast period, whereas the small increases in glucose seemed to occur in the afternoon following the lunch meal. Perhaps the post-breakfast exercise leading to rapid and substantial declines in insulin initiated a counter-regulatory response that facilitated hepatic glucose production during the post-lunch period. Indeed, a fall in insulin can sensitize the liver to glucagon [35]; and postprandial glucagon secretion has been observed in middle-aged participants who were obese but otherwise healthy [36]. Therefore, a fall in insulin followed by a postprandial rise in glucagon may work synergistically to increase hepatic glucose output [37]. In a recent meta-analysis, counter-regulation of glucose following continuous exercise has been suggested to explain why continuous exercise is inferior to isoenergetic intermittent exercise in terms of postprandial glucose lowering [38].

Although the outcomes of the current study cannot explain the mechanisms underlying changes in glucose and insulin dynamics, the overall insulin-to-glucose ratio tAUC was decreased by 21 and 28% during EX+SIT and EX+BR, respectively, compared to SIT. Since the difference between EX+SIT and EX+BR was also significant, this suggests the additional benefit of combining exercise with subsequent breaks in sitting is an approximate 7% reduction in the insulin-to-glucose ratio tAUC. These reductions likely translate to a reduced demand on insulin secretion. Our data suggest that a bout of exercise may curb the compensatory hyperinsulinemia which is associated with progression of insulin resistance by reducing demand for insulin secretion, and this effect is enhanced with the addition of intermittent breaks in sitting.

Postprandial triglyceride responses

An interesting finding from the current study was that the postprandial triglyceride tAUC was reduced by 6% in EX+BR, relative to SIT. Since this reduction was also significantly lower than EX+SIT, it suggests that there may be a synergistic effect of combining an exercise bout with active interruptions to sitting on lowering same-day postprandial triglyceride responses. This may help mitigate the development of insulin resistance since hyperlipidemia promotes the storage of lipids in muscle, liver, and visceral adipose tissue [11, 39].

In contrast to some previous studies, we observed a reduction in postprandial triglycerides during the 8-h intervention. In a recent meta-analysis of experimental studies comparing prolonged sitting to sitting interrupted with light to moderate-intensity activity, postprandial triglycerides were only reduced 12–16 h after the interventions had ended [8]. Similarly, one previous study demonstrated that regular interruptions to sitting followed by an exercise bout at the end of the day reduced postprandial triglycerides the next day [18]. The suggested reason for this delayed effect is exercise-induced activation of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) which can increase for up to 24-h post-exercise [40]. In the postprandial state, LPL plays an important role in clearing triglycerides from circulation by liberating free fatty acids from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins [41].

Similar to the current study, Miyashiata et al. observed a same day reduction of approximately 11% in the 8-h triglyceride tAUC [32]. Interestingly, this occurred in response to the intermittent light-intensity walking breaks condition and not the continuous exercise plus prolonged sitting condition. This suggests that intermittent exercise may be more effective at lowering same day triglycerides than continuous exercise, a concept supported by our finding that no significant reduction in triglyceride tAUC was observed in EX+SIT relative to SIT. Without a fourth condition (sitting interruptions without exercise), the question remains whether breaks in sitting alone would have been sufficient to lower the triglyceride tAUC in the current study population.

There is reason to suspect that combining exercise with breaks in sitting had a synergistic effect on lowering triglycerides in the current study. This is because the initial exercise bout substantially lowered insulin levels. Since insulin can stimulate LPL activity in adipose tissue while inhibiting activity in skeletal muscle [42], large declines in insulin may have facilitated a shift in the site of triglyceride clearance away from adipose tissue and towards the working muscles. A higher blood flow to the lower limb working muscles would also be expected when exercise is followed by intermittent breaks in sitting. Indeed, we have previously demonstrated that intermittent activity breaks can increase femoral artery blood flow by an average of 46% over 5 h, relative to uninterrupted sitting [43]. The reduction in triglycerides may be a result of directing fatty acids to the lower limb working muscles, which can act as a ‘sink’ for triglycerides due to activity of lipases and subsequent fatty acid utilization for energy production [44]. Alternatively, the reduction in circulating triglycerides could be explained in the context of reduced insulin, as insulin can inhibit the production of dietary chylomicrons [45]. Ultimately, it is unclear from the current study what proportion of the reduction in triglycerides during EX+BR relates to an increased clearance, versus a decreased production of lipoproteins, and this should be investigated in future experiments.

Baseline measures as predictors of intervention-induced change

While the precise mechanism of the observed reduction in postprandial triglycerides is unknown, our analyses offered insight on what may predict the magnitude of reduction. We observed a curvilinear relationship suggesting that those with a high fasting triglyceride level (above 0.6 ln or ~ 1.8 mmol∙L− 1) at baseline may be resistant to the intervention-induced decreases in postprandial triglycerides observed overall in EX+BR compared to SIT. A higher fasting triglyceride level could indicate hepatic insulin resistance, which would promote hepatic triglyceride production [30]. In addition, insulin resistance has been associated with increased production of intestinal lipoproteins in the postprandial state [46], and has also been associated with decreased muscle lipoprotein lipase activity [47]. This may partly explain the current findings, although HOMA2-IR was not significantly associated with intervention-induced change in postprandial triglycerides (data not shown). However, HOMA2-IR is not the gold standard method to assess insulin resistance. Future studies that more accurately measure insulin resistance are needed to corroborate the current finding. One alternative is the oral glucose minimal model technique with a tracer which measures the selective effect of insulin on glucose disposal under physiological conditions [48].

Similar to previous research [49], we observed that those with higher baseline HOMA2-IR and HOMA2-%β had larger reductions in postprandial insulin when comparing the response during EX+BR to the response during SIT. However, our analyses indicate that this may be a curvilinear relationship. This suggests there may be a threshold past which greater underlying insulin resistance or β-cell function is exponentially associated with greater intervention-induced reductions in postprandial insulin.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths of our study include the large sample size and randomized crossover design, where participants serve as their own controls. In addition, food intake was controlled from the evening before each experimental condition and on the day of each experiment with the provision of standardized mixed meals. The use of real food mixed meals also represents a more ecologically valid nutrient stimulus compared to liquid meals. Another strength is the assessment of both linear and non-linear relationships between intervention-induced change and their predictors within a mixed model controlling for potential confounders. Since the relationships were found to be non-linear, this aids the interpretation suggesting that the observed relationships with intervention-induced change are only present when the value of the predictor is past a certain threshold.

There are also some limitations to consider. For example, it is unknown whether the benefits observed during EX+BR relative to EX+SIT are due to increased energy expenditure and/or muscle activation of the walking breaks or due to their intermittent nature. This mechanistic question may be particularly important in relation to postprandial triglycerides, as the role of muscle LPL activity is less clear in acute exercise studies of a shorter duration (≤8 h) [8, 50]. Future studies will need to tease apart the role of energy expenditure, muscle activation, and timing of activity breaks in order to optimize strategies to reduce postprandial triglycerides. In addition, these results cannot necessarily be extrapolated to younger, leaner participants. Although we had a large sample size, our participants did not span a broad variation of metabolic phenotypes (i.e. dysglycemia and dyslipidemia). Thus, our analyses of predictors of intervention-induced change offer insights on associations only within the range of glycaemia and lipidaemia exhibited by the current study population. Future studies employing similar analysis techniques would benefit from including participants across a wider spectrum of health and disease. In addition, future studies are required to determine whether the effects observed in the acute setting are sustained when such strategies are repeated over longer periods of time.


In conclusion, we have demonstrated combined effects of continuous exercise and intermittent active interruptions to sitting on reducing postprandial insulin, insulin-to-glucose ratio and triglycerides. These results are informative from a practical perspective, since it is possible for a person to achieve the guideline-recommended level of daily exercise, while also sitting for prolonged periods in the same day (i.e. the active commuter with a sedentary job). In addition, we observed that beyond a certain threshold, those with a greater degree of underlying insulin resistance or β-cell function had greater intervention-induced reductions in postprandial insulin. We also observed that those past a threshold of high fasting triglycerides were resistant to the overall intervention-induced reductions in postprandial triglycerides.

Taken together, these findings offer a unique practical insight into the combined effects of exercise and sedentary behavior on postprandial markers of cardiometabolic risk, and highlight clear areas for future investigation. These insights may assist in optimizing future strategies to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and T2D in older adults who are overweight to obese.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Exercise plus breaks condition


Exercise plus sitting condition


Homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function


Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance


Heart rate


incremental area under the curve


Lipoprotein lipase


Rating of perceived exertion


Standard deviation


Sitting condition


total area under the curve


Type two diabetes


  1. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 1983;67(5):968–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford ES, Williamson DF, Liu S. Weight change and diabetes incidence: findings from a national cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;146(3):214–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vieira AF, Costa RR, Macedo RCO, Coconcelli L, Kruel LFM. Effects of aerobic exercise performed in fasted v. fed state on fat and carbohydrate metabolism in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(7):1153–64 2016/09/09.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Freese EC, Gist NH, Cureton KJ. Effect of prior exercise on postprandial lipemia: an updated quantitative review. J Appl Physiol. 2014 Jan;116(1):67–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey JA, Chastin SFM, Skelton DA. How sedentary are older people? A systematic review of the amount of sedentary behavior. J Ageing Phys Act. 2015;23(3):471–87.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akins JD, Crawford CK, Burton HM, Wolfe AS, Vardarli E, Coyle EF. Inactivity induces resistance to the metabolic benefits following acute exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2019;126(4):1088–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz KM, Howard VJ, Hutto B, Colabianchi N, Vena JE, Safford MM, et al. Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct;167(7):465–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saunders TJ, Atkinson HF, Burr J, MacEwen B, Skeaff CM, Peddie MC. The acute metabolic and vascular impact of interrupting prolonged sitting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(10):2347–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benatti FB, Ried-Larsen M. The effects of breaking up prolonged sitting time: a review of experimental studies. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(10):2053–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen TT, Hernandez Mijares A, Johnson CM, Jensen MD. Postprandial leg and splanchnic fatty acid metabolism in nonobese men and women. Am J Phys. 1996;271(6 Pt 1):E965–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tchernof A, Després J-P. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(1):359–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceriello A, Quagliaro L, Piconi L, Assaloni R, Da Ros R, Maier A, et al. Effect of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia on circulating adhesion molecules and oxidative stress generation and the possible role of simvastatin treatment. Diabetes. 2004;53(3):701–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bethel MA, Hyland KA, Chacra AR, Deedwania P, Fulcher GR, Holman RR, et al. Updated risk factors should be used to predict development of diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017;31(5):859–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruige JB, Assendelft WJ, Dekker JM, Kostense PJ, Heine RJ, Bouter LM. Insulin and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 1998;97(10):996–1001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. JAMA. 2007 Jul 18;298(3):299–308.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Homer AR, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting and dysglycemia: mechanistic links and implications for obesity. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2018;4:42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loh R, Stamatakis E, Folkerts D, Allgrove JE, Moir HJ. Effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with physical activity breaks on blood glucose, insulin and triacylglycerol measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020 Feb;50(2):295–330.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Homer AR, Fenemor SP, Perry TL, Rehrer NJ, Cameron CM, Skeaff CM, et al. Regular activity breaks combined with physical activity improve postprandial plasma triglyceride, nonesterified fatty acid, and insulin responses in healthy, normal weight adults: A randomized crossover trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11(5):1268–1279.e1.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parr EB, Heilbronn LK, Hawley JA. A Time to Eat and a Time to Exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2020;48(1):4–10.

  20. Heden TD, Kanaley JA. Syncing exercise with meals and circadian clocks. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2019 Jan;47(1):22–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunstan DW, Wheeler MJ, Ellis KA, Cerin E, Green DJ. Interacting effects of exercise with breaks in sitting time on cognitive and metabolic function in older adults: rationale and design of a randomised crossover trial. Ment Health Phys Act. 2018;15(April):11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DEJ, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task F. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):e13–115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kenward MG, Roger JH. The use of baseline covariates in crossover studies. Biostatistics. 2010;11(1):1–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dill DB, Costill DL. Calculation of percentage changes in volumes of blood, plasma, and red cells in dehydration. J Appl Physiol. 1974;37(2):247–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Supplement 1):S13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunstan DW, Kingwell BA, Larsen R, Healy GN, Cerin E, Hamilton MT, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:976–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peddie MC, Bone JL, Rehrer NJ, Skeaff CM, Gray AR, Perry TL. Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(2):358–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ploug T, van Deurs B, Ai H, Cushman SW, Ralston E. Analysis of GLUT4 distribution in whole skeletal muscle fibers: identification of distinct storage compartments that are recruited by insulin and muscle contractions. J Cell Biol. 1998 Sep;142(6):1429–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Enevoldsen LH, Simonsen L, Macdonald IA. The combined effects of exercise and food intake on adipose tissue and splanchnic metabolism. J Physiol. 2004;561(Pt 3):871–82.

  30. Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(4):2133–223.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kashiwabara K, Kidokoro T, Yanaoka T, Burns SF, Stensel DJ, Miyashita M. Different Patterns of Walking and Postprandial Triglycerides in Older Women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(1):79–87.

  32. Miyashita M, Edamoto K, Kidokoro T, Yanaoka T, Kashiwabara K, Takahashi M, et al. Interrupting sitting time with regular walks attenuates postprandial triglycerides. Int J Sports Med. 2016;37(2):97–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Holmstrup M, Fairchild T, Keslacy S, Weinstock R, Kanaley J. Multiple short bouts of exercise over 12-h period reduce glucose excursions more than an energy-matched single bout of exercise. Metabolism. 2014;63(4):510–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jentjens R, Jeukendrup AE. Determinants of post-exercise glycogen synthesis during short-term recovery. Sports Med. 2003;33(2):117–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wasserman DH, Williams PE, Lacy DB, Goldstein RE, Cherrington AD. Exercise-induced fall in insulin and hepatic carbohydrate metabolism during muscular work. Am J Physiol Metab. 1989;256(4):E500–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vilsbøll T, Krarup T, Sonne J, Madsbad S, Vølund A, Juul AG, et al. Incretin secretion in relation to meal size and body weight in healthy subjects and people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):2706–13.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Trefts E, Williams AS, Wasserman DH. Exercise and the Regulation of Hepatic Metabolism. In: Molecular and Cellular Regulation of Adaptation to Exercise, vol. 135. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2015. p. 203–25.

  38. Gouldrup H, Ma T. Why are physical activity breaks more effective than a single session of isoenergetic exercise in reducing postprandial glucose? A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2020:1–7.

  39. Chavez JA, Summers SA. A ceramide-centric view of insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2012;15(5):585–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang JQ, Smith B, Langdon MM, Messimer HL, Sun GY, Cox RH, et al. Changes in LPLa and reverse cholesterol transport variables during 24-h postexercise period. Am J Physiol Metab. 2002;283(2):E267–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fielding BA, Frayn KN. Lipoprotein lipase and the disposition of dietary fatty acids. Br J Nutr. 1998;80(6):495–502.

  42. Farese RVJ, Yost TJ, Eckel RH. Tissue-specific regulation of lipoprotein lipase activity by insulin/glucose in normal-weight humans. Metabolism. 1991;40(2):214–16.

  43. Climie RE, Wheeler MJ, Grace M, Lambert EAE, Cohen N, Owen N, et al. Simple intermittent resistance activity mitigates the detrimental effect of prolonged unbroken sitting on arterial function in overweight and obese adults. J Appl Physiol. 2018;125(6):1787–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kiens B. Skeletal muscle lipid metabolism in exercise and insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(1):205–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pavlic M, Xiao C, Szeto L, Patterson BW, Lewis GF. Insulin acutely inhibits intestinal lipoprotein secretion in humans in part by suppressing plasma free fatty acids. Diabetes. 2010;59(3):580–7.

  46. Duez H, Lamarche B, Uffelman KD, Valero R, Cohn JS, Lewis GF. Hyperinsulinemia is associated with increased production rate of intestinal apolipoprotein B-48-containing lipoproteins in humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(6):1357–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Panarotto D, Remillard P, Bouffard L, Maheux P. Insulin resistance affects the regulation of lipoprotein lipase in the postprandial period and in an adipose tissue-specific manner. Eur J Clin Investig. 2002;32(2):84–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dalla Man C, Caumo A, Basu R, Rizza R, Toffolo G, Cobelli C. Measurement of selective effect of insulin on glucose disposal from labeled glucose oral test minimal model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005;289(5):E909–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Winkler EAH, Owen N, Kingwell BA, Dunstan DW. Prolonged uninterrupted sitting elevates postprandial hyperglycaemia proportional to degree of insulin resistance. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(6):1526–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Peddie MC, Rehrer NJ, Perry TL. Physical activity and postprandial lipidemia: are energy expenditure and lipoprotein lipase activity the real modulators of the positive effect? Prog Lipid Res. 2012;51(1):11–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was funded by a project grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1062338) and supported in part by the Victorian Government’s OIS Program. These funding bodies were independent to the design, implementation, and interpretation of the study. MJW was supported by the University of Western Australia and the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute. IH was supported by the University of Turku, Hospital District of South-West Finland and the Juho Vainio Foundation. NC was supported by The Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, and has received research support from Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, Boerhinger Ingelheim. EC was supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (ARC FT140100085). PCD was supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (APP1142685). DJG was supported an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (APP1080914). DWD was supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (APP1078360). BAK and NO were supported by NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowships (APP1059454 & APP1003960).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MJW, DJG, KAE, EC, LN, RL, BAK, NO and DWD contributed to the design of the study. MJW coordinated the trial and data collection and is the study guarantor. NC, IH and JL assisted with recruitment and data collection. MJW, EC and PCD contributed to the statistical analysis. MJW, DJG and DWD wrote the paper. KAE, EC, IH, LN, RL, JL, NC, PCD, BAK and NO reviewed and edited the paper. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Wheeler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (181–14) and The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (RA/4/1/6990). Participants gave written informed consent prior to taking part.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

CONSORT Checklist. Completed CONSORT checklist.

Additional file 2.

TIDieR checklist. Completed TIDieR checklist.

Additional file 3: Table S1

. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Additional file 4: Table 2

. Participant concomitant medications.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wheeler, M.J., Green, D.J., Cerin, E. et al. Combined effects of continuous exercise and intermittent active interruptions to prolonged sitting on postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides in adults with obesity: a randomized crossover trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17, 152 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Exercise
  • Sedentary behavior
  • Postprandial
  • Insulin resistance
  • Lipids
  • Glucose