Skip to main content

The cost-effectiveness of a school-based overweight program



This study assesses the net benefit and the cost-effectiveness of the Coordinated Approach to Child Health (CATCH) intervention program, using parameter estimates from the El Paso trial. There were two standard economic measures used. First, from a societal perspective on costs, cost-effectiveness ratios (CER) were estimated, revealing the intervention costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved. QALY weights were estimated using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Second, the net benefit (NB) of CATCH was estimated, which compared the present value of averted future costs with the cost of the CATCH intervention. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES) and NHANES follow-up data, we predicted the number of adult obesity cases avoided for ages 40–64 with a lifetime obesity progression model.


The results show that CATCH is cost-effective and net beneficial. The CER was US$900 (US$903 using Hispanic parameters) and the NB was US$68,125 (US$43,239 using Hispanic parameters), all in 2004 dollars. This is much lower than the benchmark for CER of US$30,000 and higher than the NB of US$0. Both were robust to sensitivity analyses.


Childhood school-based programs such as CATCH are beneficial investments. Both NB and CER declined when Hispanic parameters were included, primarily due to the lower wages earned by Hispanics. However, both NB and CER for Hispanics were well within standard cost-effectiveness and net benefit thresholds.


Childhood overweight is a major threat to child health in the US [1]. Unfortunately, overweight children are not likely to return to normal weight later in life [24]. Aside from the correlation of lifetime behaviors [5], treatment strategies for obese adults remain largely ineffective [611]. Obesity in adulthood is closely associated with chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, stroke, high blood cholesterol levels, joint problems, some cancers, and gall bladder disease [1215]. The prevalence of overweight [1] among children has doubled in the last twenty years [16], disproportionately affecting minorities [1720].

Because no other institution has as much continuous and intensive contact with children, schools can provide a pivotal role in physical activity and nutrition interventions. Further, school programs can be delivered at low cost to families, reaching all socioeconomic levels. A number of school-based interventions aimed at promoting healthy behaviors have been evaluated for effectiveness in terms of outcomes in the last 15 years [2130]. Of all these programs, two stand out among the rest because of their sophisticated study design (Coordinated Approach to Child Health (CATCH)) and program impact on childhood overweight (Planet Health). Given that there are relatively few dollars for overweight prevention, comparisons between alternative prevention programs are warranted [31].

If childhood overweight prevalence is reduced and this in turn reduces adulthood obesity, there will be large economic benefits [32, 33]. For instance, one study estimates that obesity costs were US$99.2 billion in 1995 [34]. Indirect costs include labor productivity due to obesity [31, 35] and co-morbidities such as diabetes, which in themselves is negatively related to working propensity [3638]. Second, direct, or medical, costs are higher [39].

In this economic evaluation of CATCH, we focused on adulthood obesity which results from child overweight, the period of life where costs of obesity are higher. There were two economic measures. First, from a societal perspective of costs, cost-effectiveness ratios (CER) were estimated. CER provided the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved. Second, the net benefit (NB) of CATCH was estimated. NB compared averted medical and labor productivity costs to the cost of the CATCH intervention.

The CATCH program and the El Paso trial

During the years 2000–2002, there was a controlled trial of CATCH in El Paso, Texas [4042]. The CATCH program trial followed a cohort of children across grades three, four, and five. In the U.S., most children start the third grade at age 8 and finish the fifth grade at age 11. The CATCH intervention program in the trial was identical to the national program [4042]. The program components included a classroom curriculum at each grade level, a physical education program, modifications to the school food service, and family- and home-based programs. CATCH field staff conducted one day training for each of the intervention schools, with periodic on-site follow-up and mentoring over the three year period.

Four intervention schools and four matched control schools were randomly selected out of the two largest school districts in El Paso [40]. The control schools had 473 participants, composed of 224 girls and 249 boys. The intervention schools had 423 participants, composed of 199 girls and 224 boys. Over the three years, overweight and at-risk of overweight prevalence (at or above the 85thpercentile of body mass index (BMI (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared kg/m2)) for sex and age) increased by 1% for boys and 2% for girls in the CATCH intervention schools, but increased by 9% for boys and 13% for girls in the control schools. Height and weight measures, used to calculate BMI were recorded in each of the three years during November, December, January, or February [40]. Quality of the anthropometry measures was maintained by comparing the average of each research assistant's measurements of height, weight, triceps skinfold and waist and hip circumference for research assistant with the trainer's measurement. For each random sample of participants used in the quality checks, three sets of measurements were made by each research assistant and compared to the trainer's measurements. Research assistants whose measures differed significantly were not allowed to continue.

Among the participating schools, 93% of the students were Hispanic [40]. As is the case for most border communities, English proficiency was not universal, ranging from 33% proficiency to 72% among the eight participating schools (intervention and control) [40]. Therefore, this study allows us to examine an overweight intervention in a culturally Hispanic, Mexican-American setting.


Our methods were similar to Wang et al. [35] A societal approach to costs was used as was a three percent annual discount rate. The flow chart in Figure 1 outlines the approach. First, we predicted the number of obese adult cases averted, as described in more detail below. Then we estimated costs associated with obesity and quality adjusted life-years beyond the age of 40. Note that labor productivity costs, medical costs and QALYs were relevant for cost-effectiveness ratios (CER); labor productivity costs and medical costs were relevant for net benefits (NB).

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow Chart.

Let us first examine CER. The numerator of the CER is the cost of the intervention less the total medical costs due to obesity (which are averted due to the intervention). The medical costs are known as direct costs, and they would have been expected to have been incurred by society had the obese cases not been averted. In the denominator are total QALYs gained.

The CER formula is

C E R = ( C i N i × A i ) / i N i × Q i , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqWGdbWqcqWGfbqrcqWGsbGucqGH9aqpcqGGOaakcqWGdbWqcqGHsisldaaeqbqaaiabd6eaonaaBaaaleaacqWGPbqAaeqaaaqaaiabdMgaPbqab0GaeyyeIuoakiabgEna0kabdgeabnaaBaaaleaacqWGPbqAaeqaaOGaeiykaKIaei4la8YaaabuaeaacqWGobGtdaWgaaWcbaGaemyAaKgabeaakiabgEna0kabdgfarnaaBaaaleaacqWGPbqAaeqaaaqaaiabdMgaPbqab0GaeyyeIuoakiabcYcaSaaa@4C4D@

where subscript i = m, f indicates male and female, respectively. C represents the costs of the CATCH intervention in 2004 dollars, N i represents the number of adult obese cases averted due to CATCH, A i represents the averted medical costs when obese adults aged 40–64, inclusive, are instead non-obese adults; Q i represents the additional QALYs gained when obese adults are instead non-obese. The denominator is the additional QALYs accruing to averted obese adults due to the CATCH intervention. If the CER is less than approximately US$30,000, then we can consider the intervention cost-effective [4345]. This is based on valuing a year of full human life at US$30,000. Other valuations of life-years are 10-fold this amount [46].

Now let us define net benefits (NB). We subtracted the intervention costs from the total averted medical costs and productivity costs between age 40 and 64, inclusive, for an average obese adult in comparison to an average non-obese adult. The NB formula is

N B = i N i × A i + i N i × B i C , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqWGobGtcqWGcbGqcqGH9aqpdaaeqbqaaiabd6eaonaaBaaaleaacqWGPbqAaeqaaOGaey41aqRaemyqae0aaSbaaSqaaiabdMgaPbqabaaabaGaemyAaKgabeqdcqGHris5aOGaey4kaSYaaabuaeaacqWGobGtdaWgaaWcbaGaemyAaKgabeaakiabgEna0kabdkeacnaaBaaaleaacqWGPbqAaeqaaOGaeyOeI0Iaem4qamealeaacqWGPbqAaeqaniabggHiLdGccqGGSaalaaa@4971@

where subscript i = m, f indicates male and female, respectively. B i represents the value of labor productivity gains for adults who have averted obesity.

In equations (1) and (2), N i is predicted from data from the obesity progression model, as described below [40].

The intervention costs of CATCH

Intervention costs are given in Table 1. As is standard in economics, the value of the training time is the hourly wage. Wage and salary information for CATCH staff was suppressed for confidentiality. All wages are in 2004 US$.

Table 1 Intervention Costs, 2004 US$

Note that as in Wang et al., we excluded classroom time from the intervention cost [35]. CATCH increases the effectiveness of PE and classroom time without taking additional time away from other activities.

Predicting adulthood obesity based on child overweight

We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions of child at-risk of overweight (85thpercentile ≤ BMI ≤ 95thpercentile for sex and age and child overweight (BMI > 95thpercentile for sex and age). Henceforth, at-risk of overweight will be referred to as at-risk.

The number of adult obese cases, defined as having a BMI > 30kg/m2, averted cannot be observed from the trial because it ends in the fifth grade. We used a lifetime obesity progression model to estimate averted adulthood obesity. The process is outlined in Figure 2.

Figure 2
figure 2

Projecting Adulthood Obesity.

Our lifetime obesity progression model is

N i = H i × ( P 5 i P 6 i ) × j ( ( P 2 i j 5 P 2 i j 3 ) ( P 1 i j 5 P 1 i j 3 ) ) × ( P 3 i j P 4 i j ) , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@7460@

where subscript i = m, f again indicates male and female, respectively, and j = a, o represent at-risk or overweight. N i was defined above and H i represents the number of children in the fifth grade trial schools in El Paso [40]. P2ij3 and P2ij5 are the proportions of at-risk and overweight children in grades three (the beginning of the trial) and five (the end of the trial) in the control schools; P1ij3 and P1ij5 are the proportions of at-risk and overweight children in grades three and five in the intervention schools. P3ijcaptures the probabilities of obesity at age 21 to 29 conditional on being at-risk and conditional on being obese at age 11; P4ijmeasures the probabilities of obesity at age 21 to 29 conditional on being not at-risk and conditional on being not obese at age 11. P5iis the probability of obesity at age 40 conditional on being obese at age 21 to 29; P6iis the probability of obesity at age 40 conditional on not being obese at age 21 to 29.


Table 2 lists the conditional probabilities needed in (3) in expanded form along with their sources.

Table 2 Conditional Probabilities Needed for Predicting Adulthood Obesity

In order to estimate the probability of obesity at age 40 conditional on being obese during ages 21–29, we linked 1992, 1987, and 1982 NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (NHEFS) data with the original 1975 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I data [47]. For the 1975 data, BMI is available by sex and age. We kept those aged 25–29 from the 1975 data. Whichever follow-up dataset placed the subject closest to 40 was used. Those aged 28 and 29 in 1975 were linked to 1987 data (they were 40 and 41 then); those aged 25–27 in 1975 were linked to 1992 data (they were aged 42–44 then). The 'svy' facility of STATA 7.0© was used to account for the complex sampling design of NHANES. Note that Wang et al. use the same technique, but for females only [35].

Medical costs averted (direct costs)

As in Wang et al., we used medical costs parameters from the literature [35].


Wang et al. used medical cost data for obese women between 40–64 years of age, inclusive, from Gorsky [48]. However, unlike in the Planet Health trial Wang et al. used, we predict male adult obesity cases will be averted. Therefore, we took medical costs from a study due to Oster et al., which includes obese men and women [49]. Oster et al. used NHANES III [50] to estimate the costs associated with hyper-tension, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and stroke [49]. The age period for averted medical costs was 35 years old until death rather than 40–64 years of age as we would have preferred. If the BMI score is in a category >32.5 kg/m2 in Oster et al., then we considered the person to be obese. Recall that our definition is based on BMI being greater than 30 kg/m2 . However, this was as close to our definition as possible given the existing literature.

In order to ensure comparability with Wang et al., we also considered NB and CER using parameters for medical costs 40–64 years of age, inclusive. from Gorsky et al. (see Table 3) [48]. Because Gorsky et al. only estimated medical costs for females, using their estimates necessitated substituting medical costs for females for males [48].

Table 3 Net Benefits (NB) and Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (CER) US$ Per QALY saved

Labor productivity costs (indirect costs)

Equations (5, 6, and 7) in the appendix were used to estimate labor productivity costs. In order to estimate labor productivity costs averted, we estimated the number of sick days missed per year by obese adults in comparison to non-obese adults for persons aged 40–64, inclusive, or from the age of 40 until the person turns 65 years of age. We used median wages to place values on the lost time due to obesity-related illnesses for persons aged 40–64, inclusive. We also estimated the number of lost sick days for the obese and the non-obese using Poisson regression. The model controlled for age, age 40–64, smoking status, Hispanic ethnicity, and gender.

In addition to increased sick days, obese adults also have reduced life expectancy. Therefore, to assume that people aged 40 will live and work until they turn 65 years old would be to over-estimate labor productivity losses averted because more obese 40 year olds will die before 65 than non-obese 40 year olds. Therefore, life expectancy and mortality for obese and non-obese 40-year olds who die before 65 were calculated. We also estimated the life expectancy for those alive at 40 who die before 65 by gender for obese adults and for non-obese adults.


In order to project lost work days, we used 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Because of the complex sampling design of the NHIS data, we estimated the model with STATA 7.0©, again using the 'svy' feature. As seen in Table 3, we included overall costs of work-loss estimates and Hispanic costs of work-loss estimates.

Peeters et al. created life tables for both men and women by obesity status based on Framingham data [51]. Thus, we were able to project the life expectancy at 40 for an obese person conditional on dying before 65 years of age.

In order to place a value on the sick days averted in our net benefit analysis, we used U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Current Population Survey data [52]. The data are for full-time workers only above 25 years of age for all workers, above 16 years of age for Hispanics. The median wage data is reported by week only. Therefore, in order to estimate the daily wage, the weekly wage was divided by five; in order to calculated the yearly wage, the weekly wage was multiplied by 52.

Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)

Equation (4) in the appendix was used to estimate QALYs. QALYs in our context are the additional quality-adjusted life-years gained through avoiding adult obesity. Activity scales were used in QALY to weight, or quality-adjust, years of life that may be added due to the intervention based on questions regarding their activity limitations, if any, and perceived health status [53]. In our study, we estimated scales using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's activity scale matrix using 2002 NHIS data. Depending on a person's answer to NHIS survey questions, a health state value is assigned ranging from 0.10 (limited with poor health) up to 1.00 (no limitation with excellent health).


NHIS survey questions on self-assessed health and activity limitations were used. We again used life tables due to Peeters et al. to project the life expectancy at 40 for an obese person [51].

Sensitivity analysis

In order to determine the extent to which our results are dependent on the parameters we used, sensitivity analysis was conducted for both overall parameters and with parameters for Hispanics. All 48 parameters used in the analysis in Tables 2 and 4 were included in the sensitivity analysis (the Hispanic parameters in the lower part of Table 4 replace the corresponding parameters in the upper part of the table). In order to avoid the problems of the infinite support in the normal distribution, the triangular distribution, which has a finite support, was assumed. The support of the triangular distribution was created from the 95thpercentile confidence intervals of our 48 parameters. We conducted 1,000 independent simulations trials. Each simulation trial draws were made for each of the 48 parameters simultaneously, and CER and NB calculated (see Table 5). Separate simulations, using the same method as above, were conducted for each of the 48 parameters, holding the other 47 parameters constant.

Table 4 Sensitivity Analysis
Table 5 Parameters Used in the Sensitivity Analysis†


The results are shown below in Table 3. As noted earlier, the generally accepted conservative threshold is US$30,000 per QALY gained [4345]. Notice that when overall parameters are used and lifetime medical costs are used, the CER was US$900 in 2004 dollars. This indicates that the intervention is cost-effective. When Hispanic parameters are used, the CER remains very low at US$903.

NB was also quite high, meaning that CATCH is a good investment of public resources. In this case, using Hispanic parameters for QALYs, labor productivity, and median wages reduced the NB by approximately one-third. This is mainly due to the lower wages that Hispanics earn. When the higher medical costs used in Wang et al. [35] are used, the NB rose to US$83,368.

From our calculations based on Oster et al. [49], the lifetime medical cost differential for obese males 35–64 years old and non-obese males was US$9,716 while the difference for an obese woman 35–64 years old and a non-obese woman was US$11,086 [49]. In present value terms, using a 3% interest rate, the difference in lifetime medical costs for obese men versus non-obese men was US$4,123 and for women the difference was US$4,704, as seen in Table 3.

The sensitivity analysis revealed that in all cases, the intervention remained cost-effective and net beneficial. To ensure the robustness of our results, we also varied the rate of discount. Not surprisingly, the greater the future was discounted, the lower the NB and CER. Still, even when the rate of discount was five percent, CATCH remained cost-effective and net beneficial.


There is a dearth of economic research on the value of school-based health promotions for the Hispanic population. The results here are the first to indicate that these programs are net beneficial and cost-effective. This is despite the lower wages earned by Hispanics, which means that the value of averted labor costs is lower.

CATCH compares favorably to alternative school-based health promotions. Wang et al. [35] estimated Planet Health's cost-effectiveness ratio to be US$5,166 per QALY (2004 dollars). When the medical costs used by Wang et al. [35] to evaluate Planet Health are used to evaluate CATCH (recall that this necessitated substituting female medical costs for males), the CER of CATCH decreased to US$0 for both the overall estimate and estimate based on Hispanic parameters (This is referred to as a cost saving result). However, note that Planet Health is cost-effective.

Wang et al. [35] estimated Planet Health's cost-effectiveness ratio to be US$8,776 (2004 dollars). Although Planet health is clearly net beneficial, it is less so than CATCH. This is mainly due to the fact that in the CATCH trial, there were averted overweight and at-risk boys which lead to averted obese males. Therefore, because males earn higher wages than females, the NBs were higher for males


This is the second study of the cost-effectiveness of a school-based intervention for programs targeting childhood obesity. The CER for CATCH was US$900. Further, when we used the medical costs used in Wang et al. (see II. Cost-effectiveness ratio in Table 3) [35], the CER decreased to US$0. Both estimates are well underneath the US$30,000 threshold value [4345] of a human life-year. Our sensitivity analysis reveals that the results are robust.

With the growth of the Hispanic population in the United States, school-based overweight programs that are cost-effective for this population will be increasingly important. CER was US$903 when Hispanic parameters were used. The N B was US$69,764. Therefore, this study confirms that school-based overweight programs such as CATCH are both cost-effective and net beneficial in Hispanic populations.

Wang et al. estimated Planet Health's cost-effectiveness ratio to be US$4,305 per QALY (US$5,166 in 2004 dollars) However, note that there were many different parameters used in our study, necessitated by the fact that the CATCH trial was successful in curbing the prevalence of both boys and girls at-risk for overweight and overweight, whereas Planet Health only curbed girl overweight prevalence. Both programs are easily under any CER threshold.

There are limitations of this study. First, we are forced to project of adult obesity cases averted. Future medical technology or other changes mean that obesity rates may decline in the future, our sensitivity analysis allows to vary. One of the strengths of our approach is that our results are robust to changes in our estimates.

A second limitation is the lack of availability of medical cost estimates for obese males 40–64.

Despite the limitations of the study, the results show that an expansion of CATCH and/or similar school-based health promotion interventions would aid in limiting overweight prevalence in a cost-effective and net beneficial manner. Thus, public health efforts should focus on the implementation of school-based programs as an effective means of prevention of overweight, by advocating policy efforts such as mandates for health promotion in Texas, as well as convincing educators and administrators that their school-based obesity prevention programs are as essential to society as their academic programs.


Additional Formulae

Quality Adjusted Life-Years

Q = { i M n i S n i [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) L n i ] i M o i S o i [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) L o i ] + [ i ( 1 M n i ) S n i ( 1 M o i ) S o i ] [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) 25 ] } ( 1 + r ) 29 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@A294@


S ni = Activity scale for non-obese by gender

S oi = Activity scale for obese by gender

M ni = Death probability 40–64 for non-obese by gender

M oi = Death probability 40–64 for obese by gender

L ni = Life expectancy for non-obese 40 who die by 65 by gender

L oi = Life expectancy for obese 40 who die by 65 by gender

r = the rate of discount


B 1 = W d i { M o i D o i [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) L o i ] M n i D n i [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) L n i ] + [ ( 1 M o i ) D o i ( 1 M n i ) D n i ] [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) 25 ] } ( 1 + r ) 29 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@9D2F@
B 2 = W y i { M n i [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) L n i ] M o i [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) L o i ] + ( M o i M n i ) [ 1 r 1 r ( 1 + r ) 25 ] } ( 1 + r ) 29 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@853F@


D ni = Missed days for the non-obese by gender

D oi = Missed days for the obese by gender

W di = Daily wage by gender

W yi = Yearly wage by gender.


  1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL: Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004, 291 (10): 1238-1245. 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelder SH, Osganian SK, Feldman HA, Webber LS, Parcel GS, Leupker RV, Wu MC, Nader PR: Tracking of physical and physiological risk variables among ethnic subgroups from third to eighth grade: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health cohort study. Preventive Medicine. 2002, 34 (3): 324-333. 10.1006/pmed.2001.0990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo SS, Chumlea WC: Tracking of body mass index in children in relation to overweight in adulthood. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 70 (1): 145S-148S.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke WR, Lauer RM: Does childhood obesity track into adulthood?. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1993, 33 (4-5): 423-430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp KI, Lytle LL: Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors. American Journal of Public Health. 1994, 84 (7): 1121-1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reilly J, Methven E, McDowell ZC, Hacking B, Alexander D, Stewart L, Kelnar CJ: Health consequences of obesity. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2003, 88 (9): 748-752. 10.1136/adc.88.9.748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebbeling CB, Pawlak DB, Ludwig DS: Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet. 2002, 360 (9331): 473-482. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09678-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koplan JP, Liverman CT, Kraak VA: Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance. Committee on Prevention of Obesity in Children and Youth. 2004, []

    Google Scholar 

  9. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH: Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1997, 337 (13): 869-873. 10.1056/NEJM199709253371301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo SS, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Gardner JD, Siervogel RM: The predictive value of childhood body mass index values for overweight at age 35. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994, 59 (4): 810-819.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T: Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Preventive Medicine. 1993, 22 (2): 167-177. 10.1006/pmed.1993.1014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sturm R, Wells KB: Does obesity contribute as much to morbidity as poverty or smoking?. Public Health. 2001, 115 (3): 229-235. 10.1016/S0033-3506(01)00449-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB: Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999, 282 (16): 1530-1538. 10.1001/jama.282.16.1530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Allison DB, Zannolli R, Narayan KM: The direct health care costs of obesity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 1999, 89 (8): 1194-1199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz WH: Health consequences of obesity in youth: Childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998, 101 (3 Pt 2): 518-525.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. National Center for Health Statistics: Prevalence of overweight among children and adolescents: United States, 1999. National Center for Health Statistics. 1999, []

    Google Scholar 

  17. Troiano RP, Flegal KM: Overweight children and adolescents: Description, epidemiology, and demographics. Pediatrics. 1998, 101 (3 Pt 2): 497-504.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Campaigne BN, Morrison JA, Schumann BC, Falkner F, Lakatos E, Sprecher D, Schreiber GB: Indexes of obesity and comparisons with previous national survey data in 9- and 10-year-old black and white girls: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1994, 124 (5 Pt 1): 675-680. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81354-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dwyer JT, Stone EJ, Yang M, Feldman H, Webber LS, Must A, Perry CL, Nader PR, Parcel GS: Predictors of overweight and overfatness in a multiethnic pediatric population. Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health Collaborative Research Group. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1998, 67 (4): 602-610.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoelscher DM, Day RS, Lee ES, Frankowski RF, Kelder SH, Ward JL, Scheurer ME: Measuring the prevalence of overweight in Texas schoolchildren. American Journal of Public Health. 2004, 94 (6): 1002-1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gortmaker SL, Cheung LW, Peterson KE, Chomitz G, Cradle JH, Dart H, Fox MK, Bullock RB, Sobol AM, Colditz G, Field AE, Laird N: Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: Eat well and keep moving. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 1999, 153 (9): 975-983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Killen JD, Robinson TN, Telch MJ, Saylor KE, Maron DJ, Rich T, Bryson S: The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program. Health Education Quarterly. 1989, 16 (2): 263-283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Simons-Morton BG, Parcel GS, O'Hara NM: Implementing organizational changes to promote healthful diet and physical activity at school. Health Education Quarterly. 1988, 15: 115-130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, Hovell MF, Nader PR: Project SPARK. Effects of physical education on adiposity in children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1993, 699: 127-136. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18844.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Trevino RP, Pugh JA, Hernandez AE, Menchaca VD, Ramirez RR, Mendoza M: Bienestar: A diabetes risk-factor prevention program. The Journal of School Health. 1998, 68 (2): 62-67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Walter HJ, Hofman A, Vaughan RD, Wynder EL: Modification of risk factors for coronary heart disease. Five-year results of a school-based intervention trial. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1988, 318 (17): 1093-1100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wechsler H, Basch CE, Zybert P, Shea S: Promoting the selection of low-fat milk in elementary school cafeterias in an inner-city Latino community: Evaluation of an intervention. American Journal of Public Health. 1998, 88 (3): 427-433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perry CL, Stone EJ, Parcel GS, Ellison RC, Nader PR, Webber LS, Luepker RV: School-based cardiovascular health promotion: The child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health (CATCH). The Journal of School Health. 1990, 60 (8): 406-413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, Nader PR, Parcel GS, Stone EJ, Webber LS, Elder JP, Feldman HA, Johnson CC: Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. CATCH collaborative group. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996, 275 (10): 768-776. 10.1001/jama.275.10.768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nader P, Stone E, Lytle L, Perry C, Osganian S, Kelder S, Webber L, Elder J, Montgomery D, Feldman H, Wu M, Johnson C, Parcel G, Luepker R: Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: The CATCH cohort. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999, 153 (7): 695-704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roux L, Donaldson C: Economics and Obesity: Costing the Problem or Evaluating Solutions. Obesity Research. 2004, 12 (2): 173-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Burton WN, Chen CY, Schultz AB, Edington DW: The economic costs associated with body mass index in a workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine/American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1998, 40 (9): 786-792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Burton WN, Chen CY, Schultz AB, Edington DW: The costs of body mass index levels in an employed population. Statistical Bulletin (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company : 1984). 1999, 80 (3): 8-14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf AM, Colditz GA: Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obesity Research. 1998, 6 (2): 97-106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang LY, Yang Q, Lowry R, Wechsler H: Economic analysis of a school-based obesity prevention program. Obesity Research. 2003, 11 (11): 1313-1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kahn M: Health and Labor Market Performance: The Case of Diabetes. Journal of Labor Economics. 1998, 16 (4): 878-899. 10.1086/209909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Brown HS, Pagán JA, Bastida E: The Impact of Diabetes on Employment: Genetic IVs in a Bivariate Probit. Health Economics. 2005, 14 (5): 537-544. 10.1002/hec.942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bastida E, Pagán JA: The Impact of Diabetes on Adult Employment and Earnings of Mexican-Americans: Findings from a Community Based Study. Health Economics. 2002, 11 (5): 403-13. 10.1002/hec.676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thompson D, Wolf AM: The medical-care cost burden of obesity. Obesity Reviews. 2001, 2: 189-197. 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00037.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Coleman KJ, Tiller CL, Sanchez J, Heath EM, Sy O, Milliken G, Dzewaltowski DA: Prevention of the Epidemic Increase in Child Risk of Overweight in Low-Income Schools: The El Paso Coordinated Approach to Child Health (El Paso. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2005, 159: 217-224. 10.1001/archpedi.159.3.217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Heath EM, Coleman KJ: Adoption and institutionalization of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) in El Paso, Texas. Health Promotion Practice. 2003, 4 (2): 157-164. 10.1177/1524839902250770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heath EM, Coleman KJ: Evaluation of the institutionalization of the coordinated approach to child health (CATCH) in a U.S./Mexico border community. Health Education & Behavior : The official publication of the Society for Public Health Education. 2002, 29 (4): 444-460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX: Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations revisited. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1993, 148 (6): 927-929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Owens D, Nease R, Harris R: Use of cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses to customize guidelines for specific clinical practice settings. Medical Decision Making. 1993, 13: 395.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tolley G, Fabian R: Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach. 1994, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick M, Weissart WG: Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life Year: Search of a Standard. Medical Decision Making. 2000, 20 (3): 332-342. 10.1177/0272989X0002000310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cohen BB, Barbano HE, Cox CS, Feldman JJ, Finucane FF, Kleinman JC, Madans JH: Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study: 1982–84. Vital Health Stat 1. 1987, 22 (): 1-142.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gorsky RD, Pamuk E, Williamson DF, Shaffer PA, Koplan JP: The 25-year health care costs of women who remain overweight after 40 years of age. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1996, 12 (5): 388-394.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Oster G, Thompson D, Edelsberg J, Bird AP, Colditz GA: Lifetime health and economic benefits of weight loss among obese persons. American Journal of Public Health. 1999, 89 (10): 1536-1542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. National Center for Health Statistics: Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994, 32: 1-407.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Peeters A, Barendregt JJ, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Mamun AA, Bonneux L, NEDCOM tNE, of Morbidity Research Group DC: Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003, 138: 24-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. US Department of Labor: Highlights of Women's Earnings in 2003. 2004, Tech rep, Bureau of Labor Statistics

    Google Scholar 

  53. Erickson P, Wilson R, Shannon I: Years of healthy life. Healthy People 2000 Statistical Notes/National Center for Health Statistics. 1995, 7 (7): 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Peter Cribb, Norma Aros, Karen Coleman and David Lairson for their input. A special thanks to Anna Peeters for allowing us to use her life tables. This work was supported by grants from The Texas Department of State Health Services Innovations Grants, CDC and Prevention Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity (#U58/CCU619293-01) to the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Nutrition Services, and National Institutes of Health, National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NCMHD), "Creation of an Hispanic Health Research Center in the Lower Rio Grande Valley." (#1P20MD000170-019001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Shelton Brown III.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, H.S., Pérez, A., Li, YP. et al. The cost-effectiveness of a school-based overweight program. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 47 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: