Skip to main content

How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents


Worldwide, public health physical activity guidelines include special emphasis on populations of children (typically 6-11 years) and adolescents (typically 12-19 years). Existing guidelines are commonly expressed in terms of frequency, time, and intensity of behaviour. However, the simple step output from both accelerometers and pedometers is gaining increased credibility in research and practice as a reasonable approximation of daily ambulatory physical activity volume. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review existing child and adolescent objectively monitored step-defined physical activity literature to provide researchers, practitioners, and lay people who use accelerometers and pedometers with evidence-based translations of these public health guidelines in terms of steps/day. In terms of normative data (i.e., expected values), the updated international literature indicates that we can expect 1) among children, boys to average 12,000 to 16,000 steps/day and girls to average 10,000 to 13,000 steps/day; and, 2) adolescents to steadily decrease steps/day until approximately 8,000-9,000 steps/day are observed in 18-year olds. Controlled studies of cadence show that continuous MVPA walking produces 3,300-3,500 steps in 30 minutes or 6,600-7,000 steps in 60 minutes in 10-15 year olds. Limited evidence suggests that a total daily physical activity volume of 10,000-14,000 steps/day is associated with 60-100 minutes of MVPA in preschool children (approximately 4-6 years of age). Across studies, 60 minutes of MVPA in primary/elementary school children appears to be achieved, on average, within a total volume of 13,000 to 15,000 steps/day in boys and 11,000 to 12,000 steps/day in girls. For adolescents (both boys and girls), 10,000 to 11,700 may be associated with 60 minutes of MVPA. Translations of time- and intensity-based guidelines may be higher than existing normative data (e.g., in adolescents) and therefore will be more difficult to achieve (but not impossible nor contraindicated). Recommendations are preliminary and further research is needed to confirm and extend values for measured cadences, associated speeds, and MET values in young people; continue to accumulate normative data (expected values) for both steps/day and MVPA across ages and populations; and, conduct longitudinal and intervention studies in children and adolescents required to inform the shape of step-defined physical activity dose-response curves associated with various health parameters.


The profound and robust benefits of a physically active lifestyle are recognized even for young people. Hence, worldwide, public health physical activity guidelines include special emphasis on children (typically 6-11 years) and adolescents (typically 12-19 years) [13], and there is growing interest in providing guidelines for preschool children [4]. Existing guidelines are commonly expressed in terms of frequency, time, and intensity of behaviour. However, with the technological advancement of objective monitoring of physical activity using pedometers and accelerometers, the opportunity now exists to offer another type of message that is congruent with these established guidelines. Although accelerometers offer a greater potential to study complex patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviours in the course of research, the simple step output from both accelerometers and pedometers is gaining increased credibility in both research and practice as a reasonable approximation of daily ambulatory physical activity volume [5, 6]. Of the two types of instrumentation, pedometers are more likely to be adopted for clinical and public health applications, and ultimately are also more likely to be embraced by the public themselves, due primarily to interpretability and relative low cost. Such users (i.e., clinicians, public health practitioners, and the general public) require good reference data and recommendations that are grounded in evidence in order to facilitate an effective step-based translation of public health guidelines. The purpose of this manuscript is to convey findings that inform a translation of public health guidelines for children and adolescents in terms of steps/day.


This literature review was commissioned by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and includes: 1) normative data (i.e., expected values); 2) incremental changes expected from interventions; 3) controlled studies translating cadence (i.e., steps/minute) to activity intensity; 4) studies of steps/day associated with time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) under free-living conditions; and, 5) health outcome-related analyses (e.g., steps/day associated with valued health outcomes). In February 2010 a professional librarian executed the search strategy of CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and SPORTDiscus using the keywords (pedomet* or acceleromet*) and step* and ((physical activity) or walk*), limited to English language, and published since 2000 (an earlier review covered studies published before 2000 [7]). Articles were assembled, additional research was identified by reviewing article reference sections, and relevant content was abstracted and summarized by the first author. Where recent review articles were identified (e.g., normative data, interventions), the summarized results were presented to avoid redundancy and notable original articles selected to make specific points. Subsequently, researchers with practical experience collecting step data world-wide were invited to critically review the report, identify any additional relevant literature (including known articles in press), and intellectually contribute to this consensus document focused on children and adolescents. Study details were tabulated as appropriate. Any seeming inconsistencies in details catalogued within tables (e.g., instrument brand, model, numbers of decimal points, etc.) reflect underlying reporting inconsistencies as taken directly from original articles. The adult [8] and older adult/special populations [9] literature is reviewed separately.


Normative data (expected values)

Normative steps/day data (or expected values) provide an indication of central tendency and variability and are useful for comparison purposes and interpreting change. However, they should not imply what children or adolescents "should" be taking, an index more appropriately described as a cut point or threshold value. Early work [7] that attempted to collate normative data (from studies published between 1980 and 2000) reported, based on a single study [10] published at the time, that we can expect 8-10 year old children to take 12,000 to 16,000 steps/day (lower for girls than boys). No data were available at the time to inform the number of steps/day that adolescents take. Since then, however, studies of young people's step data collected using pedometers and accelerometers have proliferated. In particular, two reviews have published normative data for children, together covering each sex-age group from 5-19 years of age [11, 12]. Among children, boys average 12,000 to 16,000 steps/day and girls average 10,000 to 13,000 steps/day [11]. Although there are exceptions among countries, in general, peak values of mean steps/day occur before 12 years of age and decrease through adolescence until mean values of approximately 8,000 and 9,000 steps/day are observed in 18-year olds [12]. Across studies, physical education class participation generally contributes 9-24% of daily steps in boys and 11.4-17.2% in girls, and afterschool activity accounts for 47-56% and 47-59% (boys and girls respectively) of daily steps on school days [11]. Differences among countries are apparent, with children from North America (Canada and United States) showing lower values compared to other regions of the world, for example, when compared to European countries (Sweden, United Kingdom, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Greece, and Switzerland), but especially when compared to Western Pacific countries (Australia and New Zealand) [12].

Beyond these reviews, a few specific references relative to normative data in young people are noteworthy. Vincent and Pangrazi [13] reported normative data for a U.S. sample in 2002 and at that time suggested that the mean values of 13,000 for U.S boys and 11,000 for U.S. girls could be used as reasonable standards for evaluation purposes. The U.S. President's Challenge: Physical Activity and Fitness Awards Program [14] adopted these same values to recognize physically active U.S. children (ages 6-17 years). A number of researchers from around the world have used these same values as cut points to evaluate data [1517] although they can only be traced back to mean values based on a single descriptive study [13] of weekday step values obtained by 711 children aged 6-12 years living in the Southwestern U.S. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the U.S. adopted an accelerometer to objectively monitor physical activity in the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 cycles; step data for children and adolescents collected in 2005-2006 have been recently published [5]. Once adjusted (i.e., reduced to those steps taken above a specified intensity) to make these accelerometer-determined step data interpretable against common pedometer-based scales, the results indicate that American young people aged 6-19 years take approximately 9,500 (boys) and 7,900 (girls) steps/day [5]. The 2005-2007 Canadian Physical Activity Levels Among Youth (CANPLAY) pedometer-determined physical activity data (based on a nationally representative sample of > 11,500 Canadian young people) are also just recently available [6, 18]. The results indicate that Canadian young people aged 5-19 years of age take 12,000 (boys) and 11,000 (girls) steps/day [6]. To put these American and Canadian values in context, Amish young people 6-18 years of age, who purposefully refrain from adopting most technologies of modern living, average over 15,000 steps/day [19].

Tudor-Locke and Bassett [20] established pedometer-determined physical activity cut points for healthy adults: 1) < 5,000 steps/day (sedentary); 2) 5,000-7,499 steps/day (low active); 3) 7,500-9,999 steps/day (somewhat active); 4) ≥ 10,000-12,499 steps/day (active); and 5) ≥12,500 steps/day (highly active). These categories were reinforced in an updated review in 2008 [21] and in 2009 the original sedentary level was segmented into two additional levels: < 2,500 steps/day (basal activity) and 2,500 to 4,999 steps/day (limited activity) [22]. A similar (but sex-specific) graduated step index has been introduced for children (ages 6-12 years) [21]. Values for boys are: 1) < 10,000; 2) 10,000-12,499; 3) 12,500-14,999; 4) 15,000 - 17,499; and, 5) ≥ 17,500 steps/day. The corresponding values for girls are: 1) < 7,000; 2) 7,000-9,499; 3) 9,500-11,999; 4) 12,000 - 14,499 and, 5) ≥ 14,500 steps/day. The primary anchors for both of these sex-specific indices were based on a BMI-referenced criterion study of U.S., Australian, and Swedish children 6-12 years of age [23], and the appropriateness and generalizability of these cut points have been questioned [24]. The increments in the children's graduated step index were selected to be congruent with the adult index. For both sexes, each escalating category can be interpreted as "sedentary", "low active," "somewhat active," "active," and "highly active" similar to the labels used to define levels in the adult graduated step index, however, they have also been given labels of "copper," "bronze," "silver," "gold", and "platinum," in keeping with a style reflective of current physical activity and fitness award programs in the U.S. [14]. Another strategy might be to adopt existing graduated Canadian Physical Activity, Fitness and Lifestyle Approach (CPAFLA) [25] labels: Needs Improvement, Fair, Good, Very Good, and Excellent. It may be difficult to avoid unintentional potential for stigmatization using any qualitative label, however [21]. Only a single study has used this index to describe distribution of child data at this time [5] and we know of no validation study with regards to any other health parameter. An additional criticism of this version of children's graduated index could be that there are not enough "rungs on the ladder" leading up to the identified floor values separating 'sedentary' from 'low active." As indicated above, two additional levels have been added to the adult version. There is very little step data to inform an adolescent-specific graduated step index at this time.

Seventeen studies were identified that have reported relative achievement of various step-defined cut points and these are presented in Table 1 by publication year. Three of these have used the Vincent and Pangrazi [13] and/or President's Active Lifestyle Award [14] values of 13,000 for boys and 11,000 for girls (based on normative values for American adolescents [13]). Six have used BMI-referenced values (15,000 for boys, 12,000 for girls) described above [23]. Four have examined both of these, one used the Rowlands and Eston [16] cut points of 13,000 (boys) and 12,000 (girls) based on accumulating > 60 minutes in accelerometer-determined MVPA within the course of daily activity, one used the sex-specific children's graduated step index [23], and the remainder have used other variations. In general, 1) relatively more children than adolescents achieve a given cut point, 2) relatively more children and adolescents are able to achieve lower (rather than higher) cut points, and 3) relatively fewer U.S. children and adolescents achieve the same cut points when compared to those from other countries. Not included in the table is a study by Beets et al. [24] which evaluated the BMI-referenced cut points (e.g., in terms of sensitivity and specificity) but did not report the actual percentage of the sample achieving them.

Table 1 Studies reporting percent meeting select step-defined cut points in young people

In summary, the updated normative data (i.e., expected values) based on international studies indicates that we can expect 1) among children, boys to average 12,000 to 16,000 steps/day and girls to average 10,000 to 13,000 steps/day; and, 2) steps/day values in adolescents to steadily decrease until approximately 8,000-9,000 steps/day are observed in 18-year olds.


A systematic review of studies that have used pedometers to promote physical activity in children and adolescents has been recently published [26]. Only 14 studies were identified, and 12 of these documented increases in physical activity. The magnitude of the intervention effects was variable and could very well reflect differences in study participants (e.g., children vs. adolescents, obese vs. non-obese), program factors, study design (e.g., 1-week to 6-month interventions), and/or assessment protocols. Limited evidence suggests that the intervention effects are greater in participants who are 'low active' to begin with. In particular, adolescents who already take ≥13,000-15,000 steps/day do not appear to respond to goal-setting or activity monitoring strategies using pedometers. The magnitude or pattern of change that can be expected from pedometer-based interventions in children and adolescents is not known at this time. The authors of that review concluded that since there were so few intervention studies published, yet the results were generally positive, continued research should be encouraged to inform guidelines with regards to using pedometers to promote physical activity in children and adolescents. It is clear that this area of knowledge is lacking, especially when compared with what is known about pedometer-based interventions in adults [2729].

Controlled studies

Cadence is the expression of steps taken per unit time (i.e., steps/minute) and it can be used to infer intensity of continuous ambulation [30, 31]. Four controlled studies have been conducted with healthy young people [3235]. The series of studies conducted by Scruggs and colleagues [3641] were not considered here since they focus on steps detected specifically during physical education classes, which would logically include at least some sedentary time (e.g., for instruction, class management, etc.), and this would effectively lower mean cadence values. In a similar manner, a study by Beets et al. [42] focused on steps associated with time in MVPA detected during afterschool programs was not considered here.

Jago et al. [35] studied pedometer-determined steps taken by 78 11-15 year old USA-based Boy Scouts at externally-paced slow (10 minutes at 4.83 km/hr 3 METs or moderate intensity) and fast walks (10 minutes at 6.44 km/hr 5.0 METs or moderate-vigorous intensity) and running (5 minutes at 8 km/hr 8 METs or vigorous intensity) on a 200 m track. METs (metabolic equivalents) are often used to quantify physical activity intensity with respect to resting or basal metabolic rate (1 MET 3.5 ml O2/kg/min or 1 kcal/kg/min for adults). In the Jago et al. [35] study MET level was not directly measured but rather was inferred from the Compendium of Physical Activities [43]. Although participants also wore a CSA accelerometer (an earlier version of the ActiGraph accelerometers) during these trials, the output of that instrument was only used to assess pedometer (New Lifestyles Digiwalker SW-200) validity by correlation and was not otherwise used to inform "how many steps are enough?" Mean steps/minute overall for the slow and fast walks and the run were 117, 127, and 163, respectively. The authors focused on the results of the fast walk (taken at 5 METs) to extrapolate that approximately 4,000 steps in 30 minutes or 8,000 steps in 60 minutes was equivalent to adolescent-appropriate amounts of time in MVPA. However, if 3 METs is considered the floor of moderate intensity activity [44], it follows that 3,510 steps in 30 minutes or 7,020 steps in 60 minutes would be a more literal translation of the results of the slow 3 MET walk. It must be noted, that moderate intensity might be more correctly considered to be 4 METs in children [45]. Since cadences were only measured for 3 MET (slow) and 5 MET (fast) walks, 122 steps/min is a mid-way estimate for a 4 MET walk. This produces an estimate of 3,660 steps in 30 minutes and 7,320 steps in 60 minutes. Since Jago et al. [35] also reported that adolescents at risk of overweight (BMI > 85th percentile) took somewhat fewer steps/minute (i.e., 111, 123, and 156 steps/min for each of the trials), 111 steps/min is the cadence associated with 3 METS and 117 steps/min would be the cadence associated with 4 METs. Together, the floor of moderate intensity might be better captured by a range of approximately 3,300-3,500 steps in 30 minutes (or 6,600-7,000 steps in 60 minutes) of continuous walking at 3 METs or approximately 3,500-3,700 steps in 30 minutes (or 7,000-7,400 steps in 60 minutes) at 4 METs.

Graser et al. [33] asked 34 girls and 43 boys aged 10-12 years to wear a pedometer and walk on a treadmill at 3, 3.5, and 4 miles/hour. Intensity was not directly measured; however, the authors considered these speeds to represent a range of MVPA walking intensities. The boys' and girls' cadence values were similar across the walking speeds and the researchers concluded that, in general, 120-140 steps/minute represented a reasonable cadence range associated with MVPA. Intensity-related translations based on taking 120 steps/minute at 3 miles/hour correspond to 3,600 steps in 30 minutes, or 7,200 steps in 60 minutes. Graser et al. [33] studied a somewhat younger age group than the Jago et al. [35] study and this might have produced relatively higher cadence ranges. Taken together, the two studies indicate that continuous MVPA walking (assuming at least 3 METs) produces 3,300-3,600 steps in 30 minutes or 6,600-7,200 steps in 60 minutes in 10 - 15 year olds. It is important to emphasize that such a translation should only be applied to continuous ambulation performed over the specified amounts of time. It is most important to emphasize that definitions of MVPA differed between these two studies and neither used a direct measure of intensity.

Lubans et al. [34] studied 47 boys and 59 girls (all 14 years old) walking and running on a treadmill at 65-75% of maximum heart rate (confirmed by heart rate monitor). Twenty-seven participants repeated the test three times over the course of a month to determine reliability of results. The results were highly repeatable (ICC = .83-.87). Pedometer-determined cadence associated with the designated heart rate range was 147 steps/minute (range 125 to 149 steps/minute) for boys and 137 steps/minute (range 125 to 149 steps/minute) for girls. Cadence also differed by fitness level (assessed by the 3-min Queen's College Step Test): adolescents in the lowest quintile of cardiorespiratory fitness took 129 steps/min, those in the next two quintiles averaged 138 steps/min, and those in the top two quintiles averaged 152 steps/min. It is difficult to use these cadence values to extrapolate to MVPA. The authors did not report when running vs. walking occurred, but it seems likely that the boys and girls with the top fitness levels were running at this higher cadence. Extrapolating from the adult data where the floor value (in absolute terms) of moderate and vigorous intensity is 100 and 130 steps/minute respectively [30], we would expect that a child/adolescent-specific vigorous intensity cadence is likewise at least 30 steps/minute (and likely even higher in children) more than the child/adolescent-specific moderate intensity cadence, or approximately 141 to 157 steps/minute. The Lubans et al. [34] study is grounded by a relative (vs. absolute) indicator of intensity (i.e., heart rate). Further, the heart rate range tested in this study is somewhat narrower than previously included in physical activity recommendations (i.e., 55-90% of maximum heart rate) [46]. Public health guidelines issued by the American College of Sports Medicine and American Heart Association in 2007 do not provide explicit guidelines in terms of heart rate-determined intensity [47].

More recently, Graser et al. [32] conducted another study of pedometer-determined cadence and heart-rate determined intensity in 12-14 year old adolescents. Treadmill speeds were set at 4.0, 4.8, 5.64, and 6.42 km/hr after confirming that this age group could perform all speeds without breaking into a run. These researchers defined moderate intensity as 40-59% of maximum heart rate, which may be considered low compared with physical activity recommendations (i.e., 55-90% of maximum heart rate) [46]. The corresponding cadence averaged 122 (range 108-134) steps/minute in boys and 102 (range 80-123) steps/minute in girls, suggesting great individual variation in intensity-associated cadence, a phenomenon that may reflect underlying variation in development as well as fitness. Limitations include the use of heart rate to define moderate intensity and the use of a target heart rate formula originally produced for adults. Heart rate reflects relative intensity, unlike direct measures of intensity such as MET values. As in each of the controlled studies in children and adolescents described above, steps were detected by a body-worn instrument instead of by direct observation, which is arguably the more appropriate criterion for these types of lab-based studies.

In summary, no controlled studies of cadence have used a direct measure of absolutely-defined intensity at this time and none have counted steps taken using direct observation. The limited evidence at this time suggests that, in 10-15 year olds, continuous MVPA walking produces 3,300-3,500 steps in 30 minutes or 6,600-7,000 steps in 60 minutes (assuming at least 3 METs). No studies were located that have attempted to intervene specifically on cadence. Hypothetically, however, such a practical approach might be useful for increasing time spent in MVPA.

Translating existing physical activity guidelines

As stated earlier, public health physical activity guidelines are typically expressed in terms of frequency, time, and intensity. For example, a recent PHAC-commissioned systematic review [48] of physical activity and health concluded that "Children and youth 5-17 years of age should accumulate an average of at least 60 minutes per day and up to several hours of at least moderate intensity physical activity. Some of the health benefits can be achieved through an average of 30 minutes per day." It remains logically implicit (although not expressly stated) that these recommended minutes of at least moderate intensity be accumulated over and above such functional activities of daily life. There are no data at this time to inform a quantity of steps suggestive of these 'background' activities in children or adolescents, necessary to compute an estimate of steps/day that will also include recommended amounts of time spent in MVPA. However, studies of free-living behaviour present an opportunity to identify what total volume of steps/day also includes recommended amounts of activity that is of at least moderate intensity. Seven free-living studies were located that have attempted to provide such information. These studies are presented in Table 2 by year of publication. Two have focused on preschool samples [49, 50], three with elementary/primary school children [15, 16, 51], one with adolescents recruited through primary care providers [52], and one of children and adolescents spanning 9-16 years of age recruited as part of a national survey [53].

Table 2 Studies of steps/day associated with time in MVPA in young people

Cardon et al. [49] reported that 13,874 pedometer-determined steps/day equated to a total volume of physical activity that included at least 60 minutes of accelerometer-determined time in MVPA in Belgian preschool children; only 8% of their sample actually achieved this level of steps/day. Tanaka and Tanaka [50] used a similar analytical approach, but collected accelerometer data using a triaxial accelerometer to conclude that 60, 100, and 120 minutes of MVPA corresponded to 9,934, 12,893, and 14,373 steps/day, respectively, in Japanese preschool children. Furthermore, 92.4%, 51.6%, and 27.4% of the sample achieved these levels. Although a direct comparison between the Belgian and Japanese studies must be tempered by the fact that different instruments were used to collect step and MVPA data, the latter sample appears to have been much more active than the former; approximately 52% of the Japanese children achieved almost 13,000 steps/day and 100 minutes in MVPA while only 8% of the Belgian sample achieved a similar value of steps/day and only 60 minutes in MVPA.

In a separate study, Cardon et al. [15] examined the relationship between 60 minutes of self-reported time in MVPA and pedometer-determined steps/day in Belgian elementary school children. Overall, 13,130 steps/day was equivalent to a total volume of daily physical activity that included 60 minutes of self-reported time in MVPA. Sex-specific values were 15,340 steps/day (boys) and 11,317 steps/day (girls). These results must be interpreted with caution; the correlation between pedometer-determined steps/day and self-reported time in MVPA was r=.39. In a another study comparing pedometer data with self-reported time in MVPA conducted with 9-16 year olds, the correlations ranged from .44 to .50 [53]. Linear regression was used to determine that approximately 100 steps equated to about 1 minute of MVPA. By extrapolation, the authors suggested that at least 6,000 steps would be required to accumulate 60 min of MVPA (assumedly taken over and above lifestyle activities).

Rowlands and Eston [16] conducted a sensitivity/specificity analysis of various thresholds to ascertain likelihood of attaining 60 minutes of triaxial accelerometer-determined MVPA in Welsh primary school children. They concluded that 13,000 steps/day (boys) and 12,000 steps/day (girls) provided the most reasonable estimation of attainment of 60 minutes of MVPA by way of accumulating a total volume of daily steps. Beighle and Pangrazi [51] used a pedometer that had both a step counting function and an internal stopwatch that accumulates seconds of movement while the step counting lever arm is in motion. The resulting output is labeled "activity time" but also logically includes movement that is likely performed at less than MVPA. Although the outputs were dependent (obtained from the same counting mechanism), the researchers used regression to predict daily activity time from steps/day. They reported that 5,000 steps/day was equivalent to 64.5 minutes of activity, 10,000 steps/day equals 114.5 minutes, 12,000 steps/day equals 134.5 minutes, and 15,000 steps/day equals 164.5 minutes. This study must be interpreted with due caution (and cannot be reasonably considered together with the other two studies of primary/elementary school children) since the activity time output from this instrument does not necessarily reflect time spent specifically in MVPA, but rather accumulated time associated with all detected movement.

Only a single study has attempted to translate time- and intensity-based physical activity guidelines into a steps/day value specific to adolescents [52], and this was specifically done in overweight 11-16 year olds recruited through their primary care providers. The authors used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine a total volume of steps/day most likely related to also achieving 60 minutes of accelerometer-determined MVPA. Two definitions of moderate intensity were used (3 and 4 METs). Depending on the definition, between 10,000 (3 METs) and 11,700 (4 METs) steps/day produced the best sensitivity and specificity values for achieving at least 60 minutes of MVPA accumulated within the course of daily living.

In summary, the use of different approaches to measure steps and also time in MVPA hamper the ability to combine results and inform "how many steps are enough" in terms of attainment of recommended amounts of MVPA. Overall, limited evidence suggests that a total daily physical activity volume of 10,000-14,000 steps/day is associated with 60-100 minutes in MVPA for preschool children (4-6 years of age) [49, 50]. Sixty minutes of MVPA in primary/elementary school children appears to be achieved, on average, within a total volume of 13,000 to 15,000 steps/day in boys and 11,000 to 12,000 steps/day in girls, although these ranges reflect findings based on both self-report [15] and triaxial-determined time in MVPA [16]. For adolescents, 10,000 to 11,700 steps/day may be associated with 60 minutes of MVPA, however there is only a single study, and it is based primarily on overweight adolescent girls [52].

Health outcome-related analyses

Besides a translation of time in intensity, steps/day recommendations could also be informed by studies that relate step-defined physical activity to desired health outcomes. Four studies (Table 3) were located that examined steps/day related to indicators of healthy vs. unhealthy body composition in young people. Tudor-Locke et al. [23] combined pedometer data collected in 6-12 year olds from three countries (Australia, Sweden, USA) and used a contrasting groups method to identify criterion-referenced steps/day cut points related to BMI-defined normal weight vs. overweight/obese. The median value for 6-12 year olds was 15,000 steps/day for boys and 12,000 steps/day for girls. Duncan et al. [54] performed a similar analysis but using percent body fat obtained through bioelectric impedance in 5-12 year old New Zealanders. Overweight was defined as > 85th percentile and compared with nonoverweight (< 85th percentile). The authors reported that 16,000 steps/day (boys) and 13,000 steps/day (girls) were the best predictors of body fat percent-defined weight status. Laurson et al. [55] used ROC analysis to match sensitivity and specificity of various cut points and to identify the optimized cut point (which minimized misclassification error for normal weight vs overweight/obese children) in a sample of U.S. children. The optimized cut points approximated 13,500 steps/day (boys) and 10,000 steps/day (girls). Dollman et al. [56] also used ROC analysis in a sample of 2,071 5-16 year old Australian children. The optimized cut points for discriminating between normal weight and overweight/obese children were 12,000 steps/day for 5-12 year old boys, 10,000 steps/day for 5-12 year old girls, and 11,000 steps/day for 13-16 year old boys. The optimized cut point for 13-16 year old girls (14,000 steps) did not significantly discriminate between those who were classified as normal weight versus overweight.

Table 3 Studies of steps/day related to indicators of healthy vs. unhealthy body composition in young people

In summary, the two studies that have applied the contrasting groups method applied to different weight status criteria (BMI and percent body fat) have produced consistently high values for steps/day: 15,000-16,000 steps/day for boys and 12,000-13,000 steps/day for girls [23, 54], but these findings may be an artefact of the samples studied [24]. The ROC analyses conducted in the other two studies [55, 56] demonstrate better sensitivity and specificity with much lower values of steps/day (approximately 10,000-13,500 steps/day). Although Eisenmann et al. [57] reported that children not meeting the BMI-reference cut points were more likely to be classified as overweight, Beets et al. [24] also reported concerns about the sensitivity and specificity of the BMI-referenced cut points, and in particular questioned their utility across countries, for example in the U.S. where activity levels are lower (i.e., where even normal weight children have relatively lower activity levels). Across studies, the lowest estimate has been 10,000 steps/day, and most can agree that even lower values are of increasing concern, and higher values are increasingly desirable. However, since BMI is obviously influenced by more than just ambulatory activity, it may be more appropriate to seek agreement on a step-based translation of public health guidelines than to pursue a more precise estimate associated with a healthy BMI in children and adolescents that is also universally applicable at this time.


Drawing from the studies reviewed above, the minimal recommendation (embodied in most public health guidelines world-wide) of 60 minutes of MVPA is associated with 10,000-14,000 free-living steps/day in preschool children (4-6 years of age), 13,000 to 15,000 steps/day in male primary/elementary schoolchildren, 11,000 to 12,000 steps/day in female primary/elementary school children, and 10,000-11,700 steps/day for adolescents. Boys and girls appear to be more similar in their step patterns during the preschool years and again in the adolescent years. In contrast, the consistent sex-associated discrepancy in steps/day observed in primary/elementary schoolchildren, perhaps most clearly illustrated in the sex-and-age specific graphs assembled by Beets et al.[12] representing data from 13 different countries, and the differential empirical evidence related to step-defined attainment of public health guidelines, is difficult to ignore but must continue to be debated and evaluated.

Overall, the primary/elementary schoolchildren values are reasonably compatible with matched normative data [11, 12] and fit within ranges of criterion-referenced data that have been associated with healthy body composition parameters [23]. Since adolescents (compared to children) steadily decline in their daily physical activity levels [11, 12], the step/based recommendations above (e.g., translations of time- and intensity-based guidelines) are higher than existing normative data and therefore will be more difficult (but neither necessarily impossible nor contraindicated) for adolescents to achieve. There are no step values based on any health parameters (e.g., BMI, body fat percent, blood pressure, etc.) for adolescents or preschool children at this time to aid in interpretation.

As noted above, the notion of a graduated step index has been introduced for children [21]. The anchors for this index have been criticized [24] and there remains a concern about the appropriateness of labeling children as 'sedentary' [21]. An improvement to the original graduated step index would be to offer a more fully expanded steps/day scale. Such a scale would incorporate child and adolescent-specific step-based translations of public health guidelines within the context of the full lifespan, but also provide additional incremental "rungs" corresponding with roughly 10-minute bouts of activity. It would begin at zero and continue to 18,000+ steps/day (the highest mean value reported for any sample at this time, that is, Amish men [19]). Adoption of such a scale would be useful for both research and health promotion purposes. A schematic of this concept showing 1,000 step increments is presented in the accompanying Figure 1. The ranges shown in Figure 1 represent the best evidence (albeit preliminary) linking objectively monitored time in MVPA with steps/day.

Figure 1
figure 1

Steps/day scale schematic linked to time spent in MVPA.

The implied relationship between steps/day and various health outcomes is a primary consideration for setting any steps-based translation of physical activity guidelines. However, the data patterns presented above suggest that step cut points should also consider natural variation in average activity levels associated with age. However, then the concern is that as populations experience anticipated societal decreases in average activity levels, normative-based cut points would also decrease over time. This would make any static, standardized cut point out of touch with local reality, and therefore less useful. Standardized cut points, however they are set, would facilitate global comparisons (and they could be used to illuminate gross discrepancies in between-country behaviour). The compromise is within-country cut points that reflect normative behaviour and also include locally-relevant incremental levels, thereby providing additional "rungs on the ladder" for promotion of activity in less active populations. However, such a strategy must be cautiously applied to avoid validating or otherwise absolving, or even endorsing, underachievement and thus promoting perpetuation of a low active lifestyle.


The evidence accumulated to date indicates that there is no simple or "magical" number of steps/day that cuts across all ages. Preschool children are different from primary/elementary school age children, and children are different from adolescents, and the objectively monitored data presented in this review support this. In a similar way, dietary guidelines have historically recommended different amounts of various food groups depending on sex and age. Applying the findings reviewed herein, primary/elementary schoolchildren would be directed (in both public health messages and targeted interventions) to higher levels (boys 13,000-15,000 steps/day; girls 11,000-12,000 steps/day, as indicated by collected evidence reviewed above), adolescents (10,000-11,700 steps/day) would be intermediate to children and adults [8], and adults and older adults [9] directed to the ranges more specifically appropriate for them, adjusting of course in consideration of abilities and lifestyles that must accommodate disability or chronic illnesses. No potentially stigmatizing labelling would be applied. Regardless, however, every individual would be able to identify their level and the ones immediately above.

If adopted, such a steps/day scale should continue to reinforce the importance and added value of taking at least an age-appropriate portion of daily steps (e.g., 6,000 steps over 60 minutes) at minimally moderate intensity, and if at all possible, at vigorous intensity, congruent with public health guidelines world-wide. Of course, non-ambulatory moderate and vigorous intensity activities (e.g., swimming, bicycling) are also valuable. Recommendations are based on a limited number of relevant studies and must therefore be considered preliminary. Further research is needed to confirm and extend values for directly measured cadences, associated speeds, and MET values in young people; continue to accumulate normative data (expected values) for both steps/day and MVPA across ages and populations; and, conduct more cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies in children and adolescents to inform the shape of dose-response curves of step-defined physical activity associated with various health parameters.


  1. 1.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: Be Active, Healthy, and Happy!. 2008, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Public Health Agency of Canada & Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology: Canada's Physical Activity Guide to Healthy Active Living for Children. 2002, Ottawa, Ont.: Public Health Agency

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Public Health Agency of Canada & Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology: Canada's Physical Activity Guide to Healthy Active Living for Youth. 2002, Ottawa, Ont.: Public Health Agency

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Timmons BW, Naylor PJ, Pfeiffer KA: Physical activity for preschool children--how much and how?. Can J Public Health. 2007, 98 (Suppl 2): S122-134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT: Accelerometer-determined steps/day in U.S. children and youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010, 42: 2244-2250. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e32d7f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Craig CL, Cameron C, Griffiths JM, Tudor-Locke C: Descriptive epidemiology of youth pedometer-determined physical activity: CANPLAY. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010, 42: 163-1643.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tudor-Locke C, Myers AM: Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001, 72: 1-12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, Clemes SA, De Cocker K, Giles-Corti B, Hatano Y, Inoue S, Matsudo SM, Mutrie N, et al: How many steps/day are enough? For adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011, 8: 79-10.1186/1479-5868-8-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, Bell RC, Croteau KA, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Ewald B, Gardner AW, Hatano Y, Lutes LD, et al: How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011, 8: 80-10.1186/1479-5868-8-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rowlands AV, Eston RG, Ingledew DK: Relationship between activity levels, aerobic fitness, and body fat in 8- to 10-yr-old children. J Appl Physiol. 1999, 86: 1428-1435.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tudor-Locke C, McClain JJ, Hart TL, Sisson SB, Washington TL: Expected values for pedometer-determined physical activity in youth. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009, 80: 164-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Beets MW, Bornstein D, Beighle A, Cardinal BJ, Morgan CF: Pedometer-measured physical activity patterns of youth: a 13-country review. Am J Prev Med. 2010, 38: 208-216. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vincent SD, Pangrazi RP: An examination of the activity patterns of elementary school children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002, 14: 432-441.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    The President's Challenge: Physical Activity & Fitness Awards Program. []

  15. 15.

    Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I: A pilot study comparing pedometer counts with reported physical activity in elementary schoolchildren. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2004, 16: 355-367.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rowlands AV, Eston RG: Comparison of accelerometer and pedometer measures of physical activity in boys and girls, ages 8-10 years. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005, 76: 251-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lubans D, Morgan P: Evaluation of an extra-curricular school sport programme promoting lifestyle and lifetime activity for adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2008, 26: 519-529. 10.1080/02640410701624549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C, Cragg S, Cameron C: Process and Treatment of Pedometer Data Collection for Youth: The CANPLAY Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010, 42: 430-435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bassett DR, Schneider PL, Huntington GE: Physical activity in an Old Order Amish community. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004, 36: 79-85. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106184.71258.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR: How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004, 34: 1-8. 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, Kang M: Revisiting "How many steps are enough?". Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: S537-543. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c7133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT: Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009, 41: 1384-1391. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318199885c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tudor-Locke C, Pangrazi RP, Corbin CB, Rutherford WJ, Vincent SD, Raustorp A, Tomson LM, Cuddihy TF: BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children. Prev Med. 2004, 38: 857-864. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Beets MW, Le Masurier GC, Beighle A, Rowe DA, Morgan CF, Rutherford J, Wright M, Darst P, Pangrazi R: Are current body mass index referenced pedometer step-count recommendations applicable to US youth?. J Phys Act Health. 2008, 5: 665-674.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology: The Canadian Physical Activity, Fitness & Lifestyle Approach (CPAFLA): CSEP-Health & Fitness Program's Health-Related Appraisal and Counselling Strategy. 2003, Ottawa, Ont.: Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology, 3

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Tudor-Locke C: A systematic review of studies using pedometers to promote physical activity among youth. Prev Med. 2009, 48: 307-315. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kang M, Marshall SJ, Barreira TV, Lee JO: Effect of pedometer-based physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009, 80: 648-655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, Stave CD, Olkin I, Sirard JR: Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007, 298: 2296-2304. 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Richardson CR, Newton TL, Abraham JJ, Sen A, Jimbo M, Swartz AM: A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss. Ann Fam Med. 2008, 6: 69-77. 10.1370/afm.761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, Lee SM, Swan PD: Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005, 30: 666-676. 10.1139/h05-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Marshall SJ, Levy SS, Tudor-Locke CE, Kolkhorst FW, Wooten KM, Ji M, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE: Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 36: 410-415. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Graser SV, Groves A, Prusak KA, Pennington TR: Pedometer steps-per-minute, moderate intensity, and individual differences in 12-14-year-old youth. J Phys Act Health. 2011, 8: 272-278.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Graser SV, Pangrazi RP, Vincent WJ: Step It Up: Activity Intensity Using Pedometers. JOPERD. 2009, 80: 22-24.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Boreham CA, Callister R: The relationship between heart rate intensity and pedometer step counts in adolescents. J Sports Sci. 2009, 27: 591-597. 10.1080/02640410802676687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jago R, Watson K, Baranowski T, Zakeri I, Yoo S, Baranowski J, Conry K: Pedometer reliability, validity and daily activity targets among 10- to 15-year-old boys. J Sports Sci. 2006, 24: 241-251. 10.1080/02640410500141661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Scruggs PW: Quantifying activity time via pedometry in fifth- and sixth-grade physical education. J Phys Act Health. 2007, 4: 215-227.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Scruggs PW: Middle school physical education physical activity quantification: a pedometer steps/min guideline. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007, 78: 284-292.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Scruggs PW: A comparative analysis of pedometry in measuring physical activity of children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007, 39: 1837-1846. 10.1249/mss.0b013e318126c1aa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Scruggs PW, Beveridge SK, Eisenman PA, Watson DL, Shultz BB, Ransdell LB: Quantifying physical activity via pedometry in elementary physical education. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003, 35: 1065-1071. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000069748.02525.B2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Scruggs PW, Beveridge SK, Watson DL, Clocksin BD: Quantifying physical activity in first-through fourth-grade physical education via pedometry. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005, 76: 166-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Scruggs PW, Mungen JD, Oh Y: Quantifying moderate to vigorous physical activity in high school education: a pedometer steps/minute standard. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2010, 14: 104-115. 10.1080/10913671003715565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Beets MW, Beighle A, Bottai M, Rooney L, Tilley F: Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for afterschool programs. J Phys Act Health.

  43. 43.

    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, Bassett DR, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, et al: Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32: S498-504. 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee: Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. 2008, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M: Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 181-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    American College of Sports Medicine: Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30: 975-991. 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A: Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007, 39: 1423-1434. 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Janssen I, Leblanc AG: Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010, 11: 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of physical activity in preschool children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007, 19: 205-214.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tanaka C, Tanaka S: Daily physical activity in Japanese preschool children evaluated by triaxial accelerometry: the relationship between period of engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily step counts. J Physiol Anthropol. 2009, 28: 283-288. 10.2114/jpa2.28.283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Beighle A, Pangrazi RP: Measuring children's activity levels: The association between step-counts and activity time. J Phys Act Health. 2006, 3: 221-229.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Adams MA, Caparosa S, Thompson S, Norman GJ: Translating physical activity recommendations for overweight adolescents to steps per day. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 37: 137-140. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Olds T, Ridley K, Dollman J, Maher C: The validity of a computerised use of time recall, the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010, 22: 34-43.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK: Step count recommendations for children based on body fat. Prev Med. 2007, 44: 42-44. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Laurson KR, Eisenmann JC, Welk GJ, Wickel EE, Gentile DA, Walsh DA: Evaluation of youth pedometer-determined physical activity guidelines using receiver operator characteristic curves. Prev Med. 2008, 46: 419-424. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.12.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Dollman J, Olds TS, Esterman A, Kupke T: Pedometer step guidelines in relation to weight status among 5- to 16-year-old Australians. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010, 22: 288-300.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Eisenmann JC, Laurson KR, Wickel EE, Gentile D, Walsh D: Utility of pedometer step recommendations for predicting overweight in children. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007, 31: 1179-1182. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803553.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Raustorp A, Pangrazi RP, Stahle A: Physical activity level and body mass index among schoolchildren in south-eastern Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 93: 400-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Parfitt G, Eston RG: The relationship between children's habitual activity level and psychological well-being. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94: 1791-1797. 10.1080/08035250500268266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zizzi S, Vitullo E, Rye J, O'Hara-Tompkins N, Abildso C, Fisher B, Bartlett M: Impact of a Three-week Pedometer Intervention on High School Students' Daily Step Counts and Perceptions of Physical Activity. Am J Health Edu. 2006, 37: 35-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Raustorp A, Ludvigsson J: Secular trends of pedometer-determined physical activity in Swedish school children. Acta Paediatr. 2007, 96: 1824-1828. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00525.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Duncan MJ, Al-Nakeeb Y, Woodfield L, Lyons M: Pedometer determined physical activity levels in primary school children from central England. Prev Med. 2007, 44: 416-420. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.11.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Raustorp A, Svenson K, Perlinger T: Tracking of pedometer-determined physical activity: a 5-year follow-up study of adolescents in Sweden. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007, 19: 228-238.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Reed JA, Brittenham SW, Phillips DA, Carlisle CS: A Preliminary Examination of the Fitness Levels of Children Who Meet the President's Council Physical Activity Recommendation. Physical Educator. 2007, 64: 159-167.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Downs SM, Marshall D, Ng C, Willows ND: Central adiposity and associated lifestyle factors in Cree children. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008, 33: 476-482. 10.1139/H08-027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Hohepa M, Schofield G, Kolt GS, Scragg R, Garrett N: Pedometer-determined physical activity levels of adolescents: differences by age, sex, time of week, and transportation mode to school. J Phys Act Health. 2008, 5 (Suppl 1): S140-152.

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Belton S, Brady P, Meegan S, Woods C: Pedometer step count and BMI of Irish primary school children aged 6-9 years. Prev Med. 2010, 50: 189-192. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and Funding

Production of this literature review has been made possible through a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). The funding body had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The views expressed herein solely represent the views of the authors. We would like to thank Dr. David R. Bassett, Jr. (Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA) for his thorough review of this manuscript prior to submission.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catrine Tudor-Locke.

Additional information

Competing interests

The following authors declare they have no competing interests: CT-L, MWB, SB, GMC, SD, YH, DRL, TSO, AR, DAR, JCS, and ST. CLC is associated with the Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute which is funding in part by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). AR has served as medical advisor for Keep Walking Scandinavia AB, a company in the wellness sector with online consulting, online distribution of literature and online distribution of pedometers of different brands. SNB receives book royalties (<$5,000/year) from Human Kinetics; honoraria for service on the Scientific/Medical Advisory Boards for Alere, Technogym, Santech, and Jenny Craig; and honoraria for lectures and consultations from scientific, educational, and lay groups. During the past 5-year period SNB has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health, Department of Defence, Body Media, and Coca Cola.

Authors' contributions

CT-L and CLC conceived and designed the project. CT-L acquired the data and prepared analysis for initial interpretation. All authors contributed to subsequent analysis and interpretation of data. CT-L prepared a draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. MWB, JSD, DRL, TSO, edit checked the tables. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and take public responsibility for its content.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C.L., Beets, M.W. et al. How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8, 78 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Physical Activity
  • Physical Activity Guideline
  • Daily Step
  • Vigorous Intensity
  • Public Health Guideline