Accumulating evidence suggests that, independent of physical activity levels, sedentary behaviours are associated with increased risk of cardio-metabolic disease, all-cause mortality, and a variety of physiological and psychological problems. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to determine the relationship between sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth aged 5-17 years. Online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO), personal libraries and government documents were searched for relevant studies examining time spent engaging in sedentary behaviours and six specific health indicators (body composition, fitness, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, self-esteem, pro-social behaviour and academic achievement). 232 studies including 983,840 participants met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Television (TV) watching was the most common measure of sedentary behaviour and body composition was the most common outcome measure. Qualitative analysis of all studies revealed a dose-response relation between increased sedentary behaviour and unfavourable health outcomes. Watching TV for more than 2 hours per day was associated with unfavourable body composition, decreased fitness, lowered scores for self-esteem and pro-social behaviour and decreased academic achievement. Meta-analysis was completed for randomized controlled studies that aimed to reduce sedentary time and reported change in body mass index (BMI) as their primary outcome. In this regard, a meta-analysis revealed an overall significant effect of -0.81 (95% CI of -1.44 to -0.17, p = 0.01) indicating an overall decrease in mean BMI associated with the interventions. There is a large body of evidence from all study designs which suggests that decreasing any type of sedentary time is associated with lower health risk in youth aged 5-17 years. In particular, the evidence suggests that daily TV viewing in excess of 2 hours is associated with reduced physical and psychosocial health, and that lowering sedentary time leads to reductions in BMI.
Engaging in regular physical activity is widely accepted as an effective preventative measure for a variety of health risk factors across all age, gender, ethnic and socioeconomic subgroups [1–6]. However, across all age groups, levels of physical activity remain low [7–12] and obesity rates continue to rise [10, 11, 13, 14]; collectively threatening the persistent increase in life expectancy enjoyed over the past century and efforts to counteract the inactivity and obesity crisis [15].
This inactivity crisis is especially important in the pediatric population as recent data from the Canadian Health Measures Survey [8] suggest that only 7% of children and youth aged 6-19 years participate in at least 60 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity per day, thus meeting the current physical activity guidelines from Canada [16], the U.S. [6], the U.K [17], Australia [18] and the World Health Organization (WHO) [5]. However, even for those children and youth who meet current guidelines, there remains 23 hours per day for school, sleep, work, and discretionary time. Several sources report that children and youth spend the majority of their discretionary time engaging in sedentary pursuits (e.g. watching television (TV) or playing video games) [8, 19–28]. Canadian children and youth are spending an average of 8.6 hours per day, or 62% of their waking hours being sedentary [8]. Similar trends are being reported in the U.S. where children and youth spend an average of 6-8 hours per day being sedentary [22–28]. Accumulating evidence shows that, independent of physical activity levels, sedentary behaviours are associated with increased risk of cardio-metabolic disease, all-cause mortality, and a variety of physiological and psychological problems [29–31]. Therefore, to maximize health benefits, approaches to resolve the inactivity crisis should attempt to both increase deliberate physical activity and decrease sedentary behaviours, especially in the pediatric population. However, to date, public health efforts have focused primarily on physical activity and have paid little attention to the mounting evidence to support sedentary behaviour as a distinct behaviour related to poor health.
A recent scoping review identified review articles, meta-analyses, and grey literature that examined the relationship between sedentary behaviour and health [32]. The large majority of this information reported on the relationship between screen time and body composition and did not include other indicators of health [23–25]. Furthermore, none of these reviews followed the rigorous process of a systematic review and are therefore not able to be used to inform the development of clinical practice guidelines. As a result, to our knowledge, there are no systematic, evidence-based sedentary behaviour guidelines for any age group, anywhere in the world. Guidelines that do exist are largely based on expert opinion or narrative literature reviews [33, 34].
Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to gather, catalog, assess and evaluate the available evidence examining sedentary behaviours in relation to selected health outcomes in children and youth 5-17 years of age and present a summary of the best available evidence. Specifically, the review presents available evidence for minimal and optimal thresholds for daily sedentary time in children and youth, and when possible, how thresholds differ across health outcome or demographic status (i.e. age, gender). The information gathered in this review can serve to guide future research and inform the development of evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations for safe and healthy amounts of daily sedentary behaviour in the pediatric population.
Methods
Study Inclusion Criteria
The review sought to identify all studies that examined the relationship between sedentary behaviour and a specific health outcome in children and youth (aged 5-17 years). All study designs were eligible (e.g. cross sectional, retrospective, prospective, case control, randomized controlled trial (RCT), longitudinal). Longitudinal studies were included if the data presented in the article was consistent with the age limits that were set (i.e. if the study looked at participants at age 10 and then again at age 30, only baseline measurements from age 10 were used).
Studies were included only if there was a specific measure of sedentary behaviour. Eligible exposures of sedentary behaviours included those obtained via direct (e.g., measurements of sitting, or low activity measured by accelerometer) and self-reported (e.g., questionnaires asking about TV watching, video gaming, non-school computer use, and screen time - composite measures of TV, video games, computers) methods. Sedentary behaviour was often measured as a composite measure of all time engaging in sedentary behaviours including screen time outside of school hours. Six health indicators were chosen based on the literature, expert input, and a desire to have relevant measures from a range of holistic health indicators (i.e. not only physical health, but also emotional, mental and intellectual health). The six eligible indicators in this review were:
1.
Body composition (overweight/obesity measured by body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, skin folds, bio-impedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA or DEXA));
No Language or date limits were imposed in the search. The following definitions were used to help guide the systematic review [31]:
Sedentary: A distinct class of behaviours (e.g. sitting, watching TV, playing video games) characterized by little physical movement and low energy expenditure (≤ 1.5 METs).
Sedentarism: Engagement in sedentary behaviours characterized by minimal movement, low energy expenditure, and rest.
Physically active: Meeting established physical activity guidelines (e.g. see Tremblay et al. 2011 for Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines [16]).
Physical inactivity: The absence of physical activity, usually reflected as the proportion of time not engaged in physical activity of a pre-determined intensity and therefore not meeting established physical activity guidelines.
Study Exclusion Criteria
As the volume of literature on sedentary behaviour was anticipated to be very high, to control the feasibility of this project, the following sample size limits were set a priori: population based studies (observational, cross sectional, cohort, and retrospective studies) were required to have a minimum sample size of 300 participants; RCTs, and intervention studies were required to have at least 30 participants. Studies of 'active gaming' (e.g., Nintendo Wii™, Microsoft Kinect™, Sony's Playstation Move™, video arcades, etc.) were excluded. Finally, studies that defined sedentary behaviour as 'failing to meet physical activity guidelines' were excluded from the review.
Search strategy
The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant studies: Ovid MEDLINE(R) (1950 to February Week 2 2010), Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2010 Week 07), and Ovid psycINFO (1806 to February Week 3 2010). The search strategy was created by a single researcher (JM) and run by a second researcher (AL). The search strategies can be found in Additional file 1. The search was limited to studies looking at 'school-aged' children and youth (mean age of 5-17 years). Articles were extracted as text files from the OVID interface and imported in to Reference Manager Software (Thompson Reuters, San Francisco, CA). Duplicate articles were first removed using Reference Manager Software, and any remaining duplicates were removed manually. All articles were given a unique reference identification number in the database.
Titles and abstracts of potentially relevant articles were screened by two reviewers (AL and one of GG, MT, RC, RL or TS) and full text copies were obtained for all articles meeting initial screening by at least one reviewer. Two independent reviewers examined all full text articles (AL and one of GG, MT, RC, RL or TS) and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus between the two reviewers. If the reviewers were unable to reach consensus, a third reviewer was asked to look at the article in question. Consensus was obtained for all included articles.
Twelve key content experts were contacted and asked to identify the most influential papers from their personal libraries examining sedentary behaviour and health in the pediatric age group. Government documents from the U.S [6], the U.K. [17], and Australia [18] were used for reference and to help guide the review process.
Data extraction
Standardized data extraction tables were created; data extraction was completed by one reviewer (AL) and checked by another (one of GG, RC, RL, or TS) for accuracy. Information was extracted regarding study characteristics (i.e. year, study design, country, number of participants, age), type of sedentary behaviour, measure of sedentary behaviour (i.e. direct, or indirect), and health outcome. Reviewers were not blinded to the authors or journals when extracting data.
Risk of bias assessment
The Downs and Black checklist was used to asses study quality [35]. This 27 point checklist assesses the quality of reporting (e.g. "Are the main findings of the study clearly described"); external validity (e.g. "Were the subjects asked to participate representative of the entire population from which they were recruited"); internal validity (e.g. "Were subjects randomized to intervention groups"); and power (e.g. "Was there sufficient power such that the difference being due to chance is less than 5%"). The maximum score a study can receive is 32, with higher scores indicating better quality. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa.
Quality of evidence was determined by the study design and by Downs and Black score. Level of evidence was used to explain the quality of available studies and the confidence of the findings [36]. RCTs were considered to have the highest level of evidence while anecdotal reports were considered to have the lowest evidence. See Table 1 for more details. When possible, studies were examined for differences among age and gender subgroups.
Table 1
Criteria for assigning level of evidence to a recommendation
Level of evidence
Criteria
Level 1
- Randomized control trials without important limitations
Level 2
- Randomized control trials with important limitations
- Observational studies (non-randomized clinical trials or cohort studies) with overwhelming evidence
Level 3
- Other observational studies (prospective cohort studies, case-control studies, case series)
A meta-analysis was performed with the data that were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics using Review Manager Software 5.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen Denmark). Pooled estimates for the meta-analysis and their 95% confidence intervals were obtained using the random effects estimator of DerSimonian-Laird [37]. Studies were weighted by the inverse of their variance. Cochrane's Q was used to test for heterogeneity among studies and the I2 (squared) index [10] was used to determine the degree of heterogeneity [38]. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias (data not shown). Qualitative syntheses were conducted for remaining studies.
Results
Description of studies
After de-duplication, the preliminary search of electronic databases, reference lists, and grey literature identified 5,291 potentially relevant articles (Figure 1). Of these, 3,299 were identified in MEDLINE, 1,016 in EMBASE, 912 in psycINFO, and 64 through key informants, government documents, and bibliographies. After a preliminary review of titles and abstracts, 828 articles were included for detailed assessment of the full text article. Of these, 232 met the criteria for study inclusion (8 RCTs, 10 intervention studies, 37 longitudinal studies and 177 cross sectional studies). Individual study characteristics can be seen in Table 2. Reasons for excluding studies included: ineligible population (e.g. ineligible age or sample size) (n = 161), ineligible exposure (e.g. diet, physical activity) (n = 145), ineligible measure of sedentary behaviour (i.e. not meeting physical activity guidelines) (n = 19), ineligible outcome (n = 60), ineligible analysis (e.g. analysis focused on content of screen time versus duration of screen time, analysis focused on active video gaming) (n = 60), and 'other' (n = 216) (e.g. commentary article or methodological paper). Some studies were excluded for multiple reasons. Some articles (n = 9) could not be retrieved due to missing or incorrect reference information.
Figure 1
Flow of information through the different phases of the review.
SB, sedentary behaviour; TV, television viewing; COMP, computer time; GAME, video game playing; SCREEN, composite measure of 2 or more screen activities (i.e. television viewing, computer time, or video game playing); BC, body composition; MS, measures of metabolic syndrome and/or cardiovascular disease (e.g. insulin resistance, blood pressure); SE, self-esteem; PRO, pro-social behaviour; AA, academic achievement.
Table 2 provides a summary of all studies included in the review. The majority of the studies included in this systematic review were cross sectional (n = 177). In total, data from 983,840 participants were included in this review. Studies ranged from 30 participants in intervention studies and RCTs, to 62,876 participants in cross sectional observational investigations. Articles were published over a 51 year period from 1958 to 2009, and included participants ranging from 2-19 years of age. Although the scope of the review focused on those 5-17 years of age, studies that had a range below 5 years or over 17 years were not excluded as long as the mean age was between 5-17 years. Included studies involved participants from 39 countries; there were a greater number of articles reporting on female-only data than those reporting on male-only data. Translators were contracted to read non-English articles and complete any necessary data extraction for studies that met inclusion criteria (n = 8).
Of the 232 studies, 170 studies reported data on body composition, 15 on fitness, 11 on MS and CVD, 14 on self-esteem, 18 on pro-social behaviour, and 35 on academic achievement. The majority of studies (n = 223) used indirect measures to assess sedentary behaviour (i.e. parent-, teacher-, or self-report questionnaires). There were 14 studies [24, 27, 28, 39–49] that directly measured sedentary behaviour with accelerometers and one that directly measured television viewing through a monitoring device [50]. The direction of the association between increased sedentary behaviour and health outcomes were similar between direct and indirect measures. Meta-analysis was conducted for RCTs examining change in body mass index.
Risk of bias assessment
Risk of bias assessment was completed for all included studies (Additional file 2). The mean Downs and Black score was 20.7 (range = 16-26). The studies were then split into groups and labeled as 'high quality' (score 23-26, n = 36), 'moderate quality' (score 19-22, n = 169), and 'lower quality' (score 16-18, n = 27). Quality of study did not affect the outcome of the study; in other words, both lower quality and high quality studies showed a positive relationship between increased time spent sedentary and health risk. Inter-reviewer assessment using the Downs and Black tool was very high (kappa = 0.98).
Data Synthesis
Body composition
Of the 232 studies included in this review, 170 examined body composition, with the majority of these focusing on the relationship between overweight and obesity and time spent watching TV (Table 3). Body composition was measured in a variety of ways including body mass index (BMI), sum of skin folds, percent body fat and various composite measures (e.g. BMI + sum of skin folds). Of the 8 RCTs, 7 showed that decreases in sedentary time lead to reductions in body weight (see meta-analysis below for details). Intervention studies reported desirable changes in body weight, BMI, and weight status among children and youth who successfully decreased their sedentary time [51–60]. Three intervention studies [61–63] reported that although sedentary behaviour decreased, there was no change in weight status (measured through BMI and skinfold thickness); however, these studies had relatively short follow-up periods (~1 year) and no control group leading the authors hypothesized that a longer follow up period was needed to detect a significant change in body composition. While nine-teen longitudinal studies reported that children who watched greater amounts of TV at baseline saw steeper increases in BMI, body weight and fat mass over time [64–82], nine longitudinal studies reported no significant relationship between time spent sedentary and weight status or fat mass [61–63, 83–89]. Of the 119 cross sectional studies, 94 reported that increased sedentary time was associated with one or more of increased fat mass, increased BMI, increased weight status and increased risk for being overweight [28, 90–182]. Risk for obesity increased in a dose response manner with increased time spent engaging in sedentary behaviours [92, 106, 110, 128, 156, 178]. Twenty-five cross sectional studies reported no significant relationship between sedentary time and weight status [24, 85, 137, 183–204]. One study [131] reported an effect in boys but not girls and one showed an effect in girls but not boys [139]. One study showed that among boys, being underweight was associated with more screen time [111]. The level of evidence reporting on the relationship between sedentary behaviour and body composition was of moderate quality and was classified as Level 2 with a mean Downs and Black score of 20.6 (standard deviation: ± 1.9).
Table 3
Summary table of results showing relation between sedentary behaviour and measures of body composition
Type of Study
Number of Studies
Number of participants
Narrative recommendation and main findings
RCT
8
1886
Reductions in sedentary behaviour are directly related to improved body composition.
Intervention
10
3547
TV watching and overweight/obesity were related in a dose-response manner (i.e. those who watched more TV were more likely to be overweight/obese).
Longitudinal
33
85753
TV watching and overweight/obesity were related in a dose-response manner (i.e. those who watched more TV were more likely to be overweight/obese).
Cross sectional
119
691759
> 2 hrs of sedentary behaviour related to increased risk of being overweight or obese.
Total of all studies
170
782884
Meta-analysis was performed on randomized controlled studies that looked at change in BMI. They found an effect of -0.89 kg/m2 (95% CI of -1.67 to -0.11, p = 0.03) decrease in mean BMI in the intervention group.
> 2 hrs of sedentary behaviour per day is associated with an increased risk for overweight/obesity. This risk increases in a dose-response manner.
Each additional hour of TV viewing increased risk for obesity. > 2 hrs/day significantly increased risk for overweight/obesity.
Mean Downs and Black score = 20.9 (± 1.9), Level 2 evidence.
Fitness
Fifteen studies assessed the relationship between time spent engaging in sedentary behaviour and fitness (Table 4). Increased time spent being sedentary was associated with decreased scores for overall physical fitness, VO2 max, cardiorespiratory fitness, and musculoskeletal fitness. An intervention reported that targeting decreased sedentary behaviour lead to increases in aerobic fitness [56]. This study (n = 13 boys and 26 girls, mean age = 10.5 years) showed that an intervention to decrease targeted sedentary behaviours (watching TV, playing computer games, talking on the telephone, or playing board games) led to increases in both physical activity and non-targeted sedentary behaviours. Longitudinal evidence was conflicting. One longitudinal study showed that > 2 hours per day of TV and computer use was associated with decreased musculoskeletal fitness [205]; while the second longitudinal study found no association between increased screen time and decreased fitness. Eight of 12 cross sectional studies showed that greater than 2 hours of screen time per day was associated with decreased VO2max, lower cardiorespiratory fitness, and lower aerobic fitness [95, 206–212]. Two studies showed weak relationships between television watching and fitness [197, 213]. Two studies showed no consistent association between television viewing and aerobic and musculoskeletal fitness [184, 214]. The level of evidence related to fitness was classified as Level 3 with a mean Downs and Black score of 20.9 (standard deviation: ± 2.1), indicating moderate quality of reporting.
Table 4
Summary table of results showing relation between sedentary behaviour and fitness
Type of Study
Number of Studies
Number of participants
Narrative recommendation and main findings
RCT
0
Intervention
1
76
Reductions in sedentary behaviour lead to increased fitness.
Longitudinal
2
561
One study showed no association whereas one study showed higher musculoskeletal fitness in those watching < 2 hrs of TV per day.
Cross sectional
12
17227
> 2 hrs of screen time per day is associated with better VO2max scores, better musculoskeletal and cardiorespiratory fitness scores.
Total of all studies
15
17864
Those watching less than 2 hours of TV a day showed higher results for fitness testing and more favourable bone health.
Mean Downs and Black score = 20.6 (± 2.1), Level 3 evidence.
Metabolic syndrome and risk for cardiovascular disease
Eleven studies assessed the relationship between time spent engaging in sedentary behaviour and risk factors for MS and CVD (Table 5). All of the studies reported that increased sedentary time was associated with increased risk for MS or CVD. However, the results of these studies should be viewed with caution as the proportion of children and youth who have measurable health risk factors for MS or CVD is quite low. Longitudinal studies found that those watching more than 2 hours of television per day had higher serum cholesterol levels [88] and were more likely to have high blood pressure [215] than their peers who watched less TV. Cross sectional studies reported that high levels of screen time and self-reported sedentary behaviour were associated with increased risk for high systolic and diastolic blood pressure [47, 108, 216, 217], higher HbA1 c [218], fasting insulin [134, 216], insulin resistance [48, 219], and MS [220]. These risk factors increase in a dose response manner with increased screen time [216, 220]. One cross sectional study reported a significant relationship between watching TV and increased cholesterol in adolescents, but not in younger children [185]. The level of evidence for MS and CVD risk factors was classified as Level 3 with a mean Downs and Black score of 21.7 (standard deviation: ± 2.1), indicating moderate quality of reporting.
Table 5
Summary table of results showing relation between sedentary behaviour and markers for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease
Type of Study
Number of Studies
Number of participants
Narrative recommendation and main findings
RCT
0
Longitudinal
2
1675
> 2 hr of TV per day is associated with higher serum cholesterol levels. > 1.2 hrs of TV per day is associated with increased systolic blood pressure.
Cross sectional
9
17339
> 2 of screen time per day is associated with higher blood pressure and increased risk for metabolic syndrome.
Intervention
0
Total of all studies
11
19014
Increased screen time is associated with increased risk for markers of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Risk increases in a dose-response manner.
Mean Downs and Black score = 21.7 (± 2.0), Level 3 evidence.
Self esteem
Fourteen studies assessed the relationship between time spent engaging in sedentary behaviour and self-esteem (Table 6). One RCT aimed to increase physical activity and decrease TV viewing [221], leading to a trend in improvements in self-esteem (P = 0.26) and concerns with body shape (p = 0.03). Intervention studies that targeted changes in sedentary behaviour produced inverse changes in physical self-worth and self-esteem [52, 54]. Cross sectional studies showed that increased screen time was associated with higher depressive symptoms, low self-esteem, and decreased perceptions of self-worth [44, 115, 147, 212, 221–223]. There was evidence for a dose-response relationship as each additional hour of screen time seemed to increase the risk for lower self-esteem [147]. Two studies [224, 225] reported that increased TV viewing was associated with decreased self-esteem in boys but not girls, and increased aggression in girls but not boys. Two studies showed no significant relationship [226, 227]. One study [228] showed a significant relationship between increased TV viewing and decreased self-esteem in adolescents but not in young children. The level of evidence for studies examining self-esteem was classified as Level 3 with a mean Downs and Black score of 21.0 (standard deviation: ± 2.4) indicating moderate quality of reporting.
Table 6
Summary table of results showing relation between sedentary behaviour and self-esteem
Type of Study
Number of Studies
Number of participants
Narrative recommendation and main findings
RCT
1
61
Girls who decreased sedentary behaviour had lower body dissatisfaction and showed a trend towards improved self-esteem.
Intervention
2
984
Decreases in sedentary behaviour lead to improved self worth and self-esteem.
Longitudinal
0
Cross sectional
11
71068
Those with higher reported sedentary behaviour had poorer scores on self worth. This association seems to increase in a dose-response manner
Total of all studies
14
72113
Each additional hour of TV viewing was associated with decreases in self-worth and self-concept.
Mean Downs and Black score = 21.0 (± 2.4), Level 3 evidence.
Pro-social behaviour
Eighteen studies assessed the relationship between time spent engaging in sedentary behaviour and pro-social behaviour (Table 7). The one longitudinal study examining the relationship between sedentary behaviour and pro-social behaviour found that sustained TV exposure (i.e. ≥ 2 hours per day) was a significant risk factor for behavioural problems [229]. Cross sectional studies reported similar findings. Those who watched less TV were more emotionally stable, sensitive, imaginative, outgoing, self-controlled, intelligent, moralistic, college bound, and less likely to be aggressive or to engage in risky behaviour [42, 115, 230–235]. Two studies found a significant relationship between increased computer use and behaviour problems in boys [111, 236] but not girls. One study showed that increased TV viewing was associated with aggression in girls but not boys [225]. The level of evidence for studies reporting on pro-social behaviour was classified as Level 3 with a mean Downs and Black score of 19.9 (standard deviation: ± 1.3) indicating moderate quality of reporting.
Table 7
Summary table of results showing relation between sedentary behaviour and pro-social behaviour
Type of Study
Number of Studies
Number of participants
Narrative recommendation and main findings
RCT
0
Longitudinal
1
2707
Watching > 2 hrs of TV per day is a risk factor for social behaviour problems
Intervention
0
Cross sectional
17
91934
Individuals watching > 3 hrs of TV per day are more likely to exhibit poor social behaviours and be more aggressive. Limited evidence to suggest this relationship is stronger in boys.
Total of all studies
18
94391
> 2 hrs of TV per day is associated with poor pro-social behaviour.
Those watching less than 3 hrs of TV per day scored more positively in aspects of pro-social behaviour
Mean Downs and Black score = 19.9 (± 1.34), Level 3 evidence.
Academic achievement
Thirty five studies assessed the relation between time spent engaging in sedentary behaviour and academic achievement (Table 8). Academic achievement was measured in a variety of ways but included measures of I.Q., school grades, grade point average (GPA), performance on standardized tests, and self-report questionnaires (e.g. students rated their own level of academic achievement). The longitudinal studies included in this review found that children who watched higher amounts of TV had greater difficulties with attention as teenagers [41], showed lower progression for reading level [237], and performed worse on cognitive tests [238] than those watching less than one hour of television per day. The majority of cross sectional studies (75%) reported that children and youth who watched higher levels of TV tended to spend less time doing homework, studying, and reading for leisure which may lead to a decrease in academic achievement [42, 181, 239–255]. This association increased in a dose response manner [181, 244, 248]. Ten of the cross sectional studies found no significant relationship [57, 226, 227, 238, 256–261]. One study [228] found that this relationship was significant in adolescents but not younger children. The evidence for academic achievement was classified as Level 3 with a mean Downs and Black score of 19.2 (standard deviation: ± 2.1) indicating moderate quality of reporting.
Table 8
Summary table of results showing relation between sedentary behaviour and academic achievement
Type of Study
Number of Studies
Number of participants
Narrative recommendation and main findings
RCT
0
Longitudinal
3
3530
Watching > 1 hr of TV per day is associated with attention difficulties.
Intervention
0
Cross sectional
32
157637
> 2 hrs of screen time per day resulted in lower academic achievement.
Intervention
0
Total of all studies
35
161167
> 2 hrs of screen time per day is negatively associated with academic achievement.
Dose-response relation between time spent playing video games, watching TV and using the computer (for non-academic purposes). > 3 hrs/day associated with poor school performance and lower I.Q. scores.
Mean Downs and Black score = 19.1 (± 2.1), Level 3 evidence.
Quantitative data synthesis
Data for each of the outcomes were assessed to determine if they were sufficiently homogeneous to make meta-analysis appropriate. The only outcome for which data were consistently collected and reported and for which the characteristics of the studies were similar enough to undertake a meta-analysis was body composition. However, this was only for the RCTs; the longitudinal, cross sectional and intervention studies that examined body composition had too many inconsistencies to allow for a quantitative synthesis of results.
Change in mean BMI before and after the intervention (at the longest point of follow-up for each study) was used as the point estimate for the meta-analysis of the RCT data. Of the 8 RCTs, only 6 had data that could be used to calculate the change in BMI after the intervention [50, 58, 221, 262–264] (the other two reported on prevalence of overweight and obesity) [57, 265]. Of the remaining six studies, one [50] examined standardized estimates of BMI only and one [262] presented only median change in BMI and not a mean change. Study authors were contacted for missing information, but no additional data was made available and thus these studies were excluded from the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the 4 RCTs that remained revealed an overall significant effect of -0.89 kg/m2 (95% CI of -1.67 to -0.11, p = 0.03) indicating an overall decrease in mean BMI associated with the interventions (Figure 2). The Chi square test for heterogeneity was not significant but the I2 was 46% indicating that there was low to moderate heterogeneity in the data. The funnel plot showed no indication of publication bias (data not shown).
Figure 2
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies examining decreases in sedentary behaviour and effect on body mass index.
Meta-analyses were not undertaken for other outcomes or study designs because there was substantial heterogeneity in the units of measures and type of reporting of sedentary behaviour, as well as the specific measures of each outcome. For example, when reporting on the relation between time spent watching TV and overweight and obesity, one study may report the relation between the frequency of TV watching and skin fold thickness, whereas another may examine the relation of daily volume of TV watching and BMI. Even for studies that examined the same outcome, for instance BMI, some would report the proportion overweight or obese, while others would report mean BMI. In addition, some studies reported on data for males or females only, while others reported only overall estimates and many were missing key information about participant characteristics or study design. As a result, we were unable to determine common point estimates and associated measures of errors for many of the studies. Due to the scope of the review, it was not feasible to contact every author for individual data to re-run the analyses. Developing reporting standards for primary studies examining the relationship between sedentary behaviour and health would help to ensure that appropriate data are available for future meta-analyses.
Discussion
Based on this systematic review of 232 studies, sedentary behaviour (assessed primarily through increased TV viewing) for more than 2 hours per day was associated with unfavourable body composition, decreased fitness, lowered scores for self-esteem and pro-social behaviour and decreased academic achievement in school-aged children and youth (5-17 years). This was true for all study designs, across all countries, using both direct and indirect measurements, and regardless of participant sample size. All studies examining risk factors for MS and CVD disease reported that increased sedentary time was associated with increased health risk; however, the included studies examined a wide range of risk factors, and thus there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on the relationship for metabolic risk as a whole.
High heterogeneity of the included studies limited meta-analysis to RCTs examining the relationship between television viewing and BMI. This revealed a trend to support the hypothesis that decreased time spent sedentary is associated with decreases in BMI. This result should be interpreted cautiously, given that it is only based on a small number of RCTs and that only half of the RCTs included in the review were included in the meta-analysis. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis of RCTs, which are considered to be the highest quality of research evidence, coupled with the qualitative syntheses of data from the other study designs, provides consistent evidence of the inverse relationship between sedentary behaviour and health outcomes, and that reducing sedentary behaviour can improve body composition. Furthermore, this finding was consistent with the results of observational studies and previous reviews [19–21, 23, 25].
Studies included in this review used primarily indirect measures (i.e. parent, teacher, and self-report questionnaires) to assess time spent engaging in sedentary behaviour. Those studies that did use direct (i.e. accelerometer) measures found that children and youth are spending a large proportion of their day (up to 9 hours) being sedentary [24, 27, 29, 39–47, 49, 178]. Therefore, for some children and youth, a viable approach to improving health may be to work towards a reduction of at least some of their sedentary behaviours either through smaller, micro-interventions (e.g. interrupting prolonged sedentary time), or lager macro-interventions (e.g. population-based interventions and public health initiatives). Decreasing sedentary time is important for all children and youth, but it may be may be especially important to promote gradual decreases in the most sedentary group as a stepping stone to meeting sedentary behaviour guidelines [266].
Strengths and limitations
Strengths of this review included a comprehensive search strategy, a-priori inclusion and exclusion criteria and analyses, and inclusion of non-English language articles. We included direct and indirect measures of sedentary behaviour and focused on 6 diverse health indicators in children and youth. Although efforts were made to include grey literature (e.g. by contacting key informants and reviewing government documents), we did not include conference proceedings and other types of grey literature because it was impractical and unfeasible to sift through all unpublished work, and also because of limitations in the quality of reporting in conference abstracts [267, 268]. We do not anticipate that additional, unpublished work would change the results.
Our study has limitations, including the types of outcome measurements and analyses reported in the primary studies and primary study quality. The scope of this review was large and included a great deal of health indicators and measurement tools. A more detailed meta-analysis would have allowed us to estimate the overall effect sizes for each outcome. However, due to the heterogeneity of the data, it was impossible to complete such analysis. Furthermore, some studies had missing information on participant characteristics making it impossible to determine if basic demographics act as a confounder for the relationship between sedentary behaviour and health. Many studies also grouped their variables into tertiles, or groups that also took into account physical activity level. Although it was still possible to ascertain information regarding the association between level of sedentary behaviour and health indicators, it made it very difficult to compare the information across studies. Similarly, very few studies measured time spent being sedentary directly (i.e. with direct observation or accelerometry). Previous work [269, 270] has shown significant differences between direct and indirect measures of physical activity; similar work needs to be completed with respect to sedentary behaviour to gain a better understanding of possible biases in previous studies. Indirect measurements of sedentary behaviour often lead to grouping for analyses. This may lead to bias in the results of the systematic review as many studies arbitrarily grouped their participants as ''high users" if they watched more than 2 hours of television per day. This could perhaps be falsely leading us to conclude that 2 hours is the critical cut-point or threshold. Further work using direct (i.e. accelerometer) measures of sedentary behaviour and screen time as continuous variables will help to clarify if a cut-point of 2 hours is in fact biased.
The final important limitation of this review was the type of primary studies that were available for analysis. Studies with small sample sizes were excluded; however we do not believe that this had a significant impact upon the strength or direction of associations observed in this review. The majority of studies (78.4%) included in this review were cross sectional, observational studies, using indirect (i.e. parent-, teacher, or self-report) measurements of sedentary behaviour. Cross sectional data make it impossible to infer causation and results should therefore be interpreted with caution. However, it should be noted that due to ethical considerations, it may be impossible to conduct a RCT on the effects of long periods of sedentary behaviours in children and youth. Due to the large and diverse sample sizes available in population-based cross sectional research, and given that this information demonstrates similar trends as those seen in RCTs and intervention studies, we believe that the evidence presented in this review provides important insights into the relationship between sedentary behaviour and health outcomes in school-aged children and youth.
Future work
The purpose of this review was to provide an evidence base to inform clinical practice sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth [266]. Future work is needed to translate this information into clinical practice guidelines and disseminate this information to health care providers and the general public. While this review was limited to children and youth, similar work is needed to inform sedentary guidelines for young children aged 0-5 years, adults, and older adults.
As the accessibility and popularity of multiple forms of screen-based technology increases among the pediatric population, future work needs to continue to focus on media engagement. Specifically, with increasing popularity for hand-held, portable devices, 'sedentary multitasking' is becoming increasingly common. Children and youth are able to watch television, talk on the phone, and use the computer at the same time. This is a relatively new phenomenon and we are currently unaware what, if any, are the health effects associated with this high level of 'multi-screen' time. This is also true for the effect of advancements in technology and their associated health effects. For example, 'active video gaming' (e.g., Nintendo Wii™, Microsoft Kinect™, Sony's Playstation Move™) is advertised as an effective mode of physical activity. Although it is true that some games can require sufficient energy expenditure for health benefits [271], the socio-cognitive and physiological aspects of remaining indoors for long periods are unknown. Furthermore, children and youth can learn quite quickly how to use minimal gestures (e.g., using wrist movement only) to play the game thereby substantially reducing energy expenditure.
Finally, as described above, the vast majority of the current evidence has been based on self-report questionnaires focused on TV viewing and body composition. It is now clear that these two variables are related. Future work needs to move beyond this relationship and focus on other modes of sedentarism (e.g., prolonged sitting, passive transport) and other associated health indicators. To do this, objective measures of the time, type and context of sedentary pursuits will be needed in combination with robust and standardized measures of health indicators.
Conclusions
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are pervasive and persistent public health challenges to overcome. This review demonstrates that there is a need to advocate for increases in physical activity AND decreases in sedentary behaviour. It is believed that a multi-level, multi-sectoral approach is required for this to be successful [11]. Ultimately, resolving the problem of inactivity requires a sustained change in individual daily activity and sedentary patterns. From a public health perspective, a reduction in sedentary behaviour may be easier than increasing physical activity per se because there are fewer restrictions (i.e. no need to change clothing or use special equipment), and can be easily attained with minimal burden to a person's time or financial resources.
This systematic review summarizes the current evidence examining the relationship between sedentary behaviours and a series of health indicators. It was determined that increased sedentary time was associated with negative health outcomes in both boys and girls; this was true across all study designs with the majority of studies (85.8%) reporting similar relationships. The majority of current work has focused on television viewing and body composition and suggests that children and youth should watch less than 2 hours of TV per day during their discretionary time. Furthermore, children and youth should try to minimize the time they spend engaging in other sedentary pursuits throughout the day (e.g. playing video games, using the computer for non-school work or prolonged sitting). This work can be used to inform the development of evidence-based sedentary behaviour recommendations for children and youth.
List of Abbreviations
BMI:
Body Mass Index
CVD:
Cardiovascular disease
DXA or DEXA:
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
MS:
Metabolic syndrome
RCT:
Randomized controlled trial
TV:
Television.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Jessie McGowan and Margaret Sampson for their contributions to this project.
Michelle Kho is funded by a Fellowship Award and Bisby Prize from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Travis Saunders is supported by a Doctoral Research Award and Richard Larouche is supported by a Banting and Best Doctoral Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Partial funding for the completion of this review came from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
(2)
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University
(3)
Office of the Task Force on Preventive Health Care, Public Health Agency of Canada
References
Janssen I, LeBlanc AG: Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010, 7 (40).Google Scholar
Paterson D, Warburton D: Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010, 7 (38).Google Scholar
Warburton D, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, Nettlefold L, Bredin S: A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010, 7 (39).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. 1996, Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland; World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee: Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. 2008, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig C, Clarke J, Tremblay MS: Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011, Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 82-003-XPE, 22 (1).Google Scholar
Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig C, Clarke J, Tremblay MS: Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: Accelerometer results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011, Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 82-003-XPE, 22 (1).Google Scholar
Shields M, Tremblay MS, Laviolette M, Craig CL, Janssen I, Connor Gorber S: Fitness of Canadian adults: results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2010, Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 82-003-XPE, 21 (1).Google Scholar
Tremblay MS, Shields M, Laviolette M, Craig CL, Janssen I, Connor-Gorber S: Fitness of Canadian Children and youth: Results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2010, Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 82-003-XIE), 21 (1).Google Scholar
Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K: Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 181-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR: Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010, 303 (3): 235-41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Walls HL, Magliano DJ, Stevenson CE, Backholder K, Mannan H, Shaw J, Peeters A: Projected progression of the prevalence of obesity in Australia. Obesity (Silver Spring). Epub 2010 Dec 13Google Scholar
Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC, Layden J, Carnes BA, Brodt J, Hayhick L, Butler RN, Allison DB, Ludwig DS: A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 1138-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tremblay MS, Warburton DER, Janssen I, Patterson DH, Latimer AE, Rhodes RE, Kho ME, Hicks A, LeBlanc AG, Zehr L, Murumets K, Duggan M: New Canadian physical activity guidelines. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011, 36: 36-46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bull FC, Expert Working Groups: Physical activity guidelines in the U.K.: Review and recommendations. 2010, Leicestershire, UK: School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences. Loughborough UniversityGoogle Scholar
Okely AD, Salmon J, Trost SG, Hinkley T: Discussion paper for the development of physical activity recommendations for children under 5 years. 2008, Australian Government Department of Health and AgeingGoogle Scholar
Active Healthy Kids Canada: Healthy habits start earlier than you think - Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth. 2010, Toronto: Active Healthy Kids CanadaGoogle Scholar
Active Healthy Kids Canada: Active kids are fit to learn - Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth. 2009, Toronto: Active Healthy Kids CanadaGoogle Scholar
Active Healthy Kids Canada: It's time to unplug our kids - Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth. 2008, Toronto: Active Healthy Kids CanadaGoogle Scholar
Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano R: Amount of time spent engaging in sedentary behaviours in the United States 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 167 (7): 875-81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF: Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year -olds. 2010, A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. Menlo Park, California; Henry J. Kaiser Family FoundationGoogle Scholar
Whitt-Glover MC, Taylor WC, Floyd MF, Yore MM, Yancey AK, Matthews CE: Disparities in physical activity and sedentary behaviors among US children and adolescents: prevalence, correlates, and intervention implications. J Public Health Policy. 2009, 30 (Suppl 1): S309-34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kirk SFL, Penney TL, Langille JJ: The relationship between screen time, physical activity, dietary intake and healthy weights in children and youth: literature review and recommendations for intervention. 2009, Halifax: Halifax Regional Physical Activity and the IWK Health Centre. Nova Scotia Department of Health Promotion and ProtectionGoogle Scholar
Whitlock EP, O'Connor EA, Williams SB, Beil TL, Lutz KW: Effectiveness of weight management interventions in children: A targeted systematic review for the USPSTF. Pediatrics. 2010, 125: 396-418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Treuth MS, Baggett CD, Pratt CA, Going SB, Elder JP, Charneco EY, Webber LS: A longitudinal study of sedentary behavior and overweight in adolescent girls. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009, 17 (5): 1003-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc AG, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, Goldfield G, Tremblay MS: Relation between sedentary behaviours and health outcomes in children and youth. Joint Meeting of the North American Society for Pediatric Exercise Medicine and the European Group for Pediatric Work Physiology Annual General Meeting. 2010, Sep 22-26, 2010; Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON. (abstract)Google Scholar
Treuth MS, Catellier DJ, Schmitz KH, Pate RR, Elder JP, McMurray RG, Blew RM, Yang S, Webber L: Weekend and weekday patterns of physical activity in overweight and normal-weight adolescent girls. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (7): 1782-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C: Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009, 41: 998-1005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Owen N, Bauman A, Brown W: Too much sitting: a novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk?. Br J Sports Med. 2009, 43 (2): 81-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tremblay MS, Colley R, Saunders TJ, Healy GN, Owen N: Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010, 35: 725-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics: Active healthy living: Prevention of childhood obesity through increased physical activity. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (5): 1834-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Canadian Paediatric Society, Healthy Active Living Committee: Healthy active living for children and youth. Paediatr Child Health. 2002, 7: 339-45.Google Scholar
Downs SH, Black N: The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998, 52: 377-84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lau DC, Douketis JD, Morrison KM, Hramiak HM, Sharma AM, Ur E: 2006 Clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary]. CMAJ. 2007, 176 (8): S1-13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7: 177-88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 1539-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lampert T, Sygusch R, Schlack R, Lampert T, Sygusch R, Schlack R: [Use of electronic media in adolescence. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007, 50 (5-6): 643-52. GermanView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Grusser SM, Thalemann R, Albrecht U, Thalemann CN: Excessive computer usage in adolescents - A psychometric evaluation. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. 2005, 117 (5-6): 188-95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Johnson JG, Cohen P, Kasen S, Brook JS: Extensive television viewing and the development of attention and learning difficulties during adolescence. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007, 161 (5): 480-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ozmert E, Toyran M, Yurdakok K, Ozmert E, Toyran M, Yurdakok K: Behavioral correlates of television viewing in primary school children evaluated by the child behavior checklist. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002, 156 (9): 910-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Neumann H, Neumann P: [Nutrition and exercise of schoolchildren. Results of a cross-sectional study at the Lessing Gymnasium (secondary) school in Mannheim, Germany]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007, 132 (51-52): 2736-42. GermanView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Johnson CC, Murray DM, Elder JP, Jobe JB, Dunn AL, Kubik M, Voorhees C, Schachter K: Depressive symptoms and physical activity in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40 (5): 818-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nogueira JA, edo da Costa TH, Nogueira JAD, Macedo da Costa TH: Gender differences in physical activity, sedentary behavior, and their relation to body composition in active Brazilian adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2009, 6 (1): 93-8.Google Scholar
Poskitt EME: The evolution of childhood obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010, 5 (Suppl 1): 11.Google Scholar
Sugiyama T, Xie D, Graham-Maar RC, Inoue K, Kobayashi Y, Stettler N: Dietary and lifestyle factors associated with blood pressure among U.S. adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2007, 40 (2): 166-72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sardinha LB, Andersen LB, Anderssen SA, Quiterio AL, Ornelas R, Froberg K, Riddoch CJ, Ekelund U: Objectively measured time spent sedentary is associated with insulin resistance independent of overall and central body fat in 9- to 10-year-old Portuguese children. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31 (3): 569-75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mitchell JA, Mattocks C, Ness AR, Leary SD, Pate RR, Dowda M, Blair SN: Sedentary behavior and obesity in a large cohort of children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009, 17 (8): 1596-602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Robinson JL, Paluch RA, Winiewicz DD, Fuerch JH, Robinson TN: A randomized trial of the effects of reducing television viewing and computer use on body mass index in young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008, 162 (3): 239-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Salmon J, Ball K, Hume C, Booth M, Crawford D: Outcomes of a group-randomized trial to prevent excess weight gain, reduce screen behaviours and promote physical activity in 10-year-old children: switch-play. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008, 32 (4): 601-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Goldfield GS, Mallory R, Parker T, Cunningham T, Legg C, Lumb A, Parker K, Prud'homme D, Adamo KB: Effects of modifying physical activity and sedentary behavior on psychosocial adjustment in overweight/obese children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007, 32 (7): 783-93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ochoa MC, Moreno-Aliaga MJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA, Marti A: Predictor factors for childhood obesity in a Spanish case-control study. Nutrition. 2007, 23 (5): 379-84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Simon C, Wagner A, DiVita C, Rauscher E, Klein-Platat C, Schweitzer B, Triby E: Intervention centred on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behaviour (ICAPS): concept and 6-month results. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004, 28 (Suppl 3): S96-S103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tanasescu M, Ferris AM, Himmelgreen DA, Rodriguez N, Perez-Escamilla R: Biobehavioral factors are associated with obesity in Puerto Rican children. J Nutr. 2000, 130 (7): 1734-42.Google Scholar
Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, Sobol AM, Dixit S, Fox MK, Laird N: Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999, 153 (4): 409-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Robinson TN: Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999, 282 (16): 1561-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Kilanowski CK, Raynor HA: The Effect of Reinforcement or Stimulus Control to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in the Treatment of Pediatric Obesity. Health Psychol. 2004, 23 (4): 371-80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Paluch RA, Raynor HA: Physical activity as a substitute for sedentary behavior in youth. Ann Behav Med. 2005, 29 (3): 200-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gentile DA, Welk G, Eisenmann JC, Reimer RA, Walsh DA, Russell DW, Callahan R, Walsh M, Strickland S, Fritz K: Evaluation of a multiple ecological level child obesity prevention program: Switch what you Do, View, and Chew. BMC Med. 2009, 7: 49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Harrison M, Burns CF, McGuinness M, Heslin J, Murphy NM: Influence of a health education intervention on physical activity and screen time in primary school children: 'Switch Off--Get Active'. J Sci Med Sport. 2006, 9 (5): 388-94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Purslow LR, Hill C, Saxton J, Corder K, Wardle J: Differences in physical activity and sedentary time in relation to weight in 8-9 year old children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008, 5 (67).Google Scholar
Hesketh K, Carlin J, Wake M, Crawford D: Predictors of body mass index change in Australian primary school children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009, 4 (1): 45-53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Timperio A, Salmon J, Ball K, Baur LA, Telford A, Jackson M, Salmon L, Crawford D: Family physical activity and sedentary environments and weight change in children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3 (3): 160-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Danner FW: A national longitudinal study of the association between hours of TV viewing and the trajectory of BMI growth among US children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008, 33 (10): 1100-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Henderson VR: Longitudinal associations between television viewing and body mass index among white and black girls. J Adolesc Health. 2007, 41 (6): 544-50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Blair NJ, Thompson JM, Black PN, Becroft DM, Clark PM, Han DY, Robinson E, Waldie KE, Wild CJ, Mitchell EA: Risk factors for obesity in 7-year-old European children: the Auckland Birthweight Collaborative Study. Arch Dis Child. 2007, 92 (10): 866-71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
O'Brien M, Nader PR, Houts RM, Bradley R, Friedman SL, Belsky J, Susman E: The ecology of childhood overweight: a 12-year longitudinal analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007, 31 (9): 1469-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gable S, Chang Y, Krull JL: Television watching and frequency of family meals are predictive of overweight onset and persistence in a national sample of school-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007, 107 (1): 53-61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Burke V, Beilin LJ, Durkin K, Stritzke WG, Houghton S, Cameron CA: Television, computer use, physical activity, diet and fatness in Australian adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006, 1 (4): 248-55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hancox RJ, Poulton R: Watching television is associated with childhood obesity: but is it clinically important?. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006, 30 (1): 171-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Janz KF, Burns TL, Levy SM, Iowa Bone DS: Tracking of activity and sedentary behaviors in childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Am J Prev Med. 2005, 29 (3): 171-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Parsons TJ, Power C, Manor O: Physical activity, television viewing and body mass index: a cross-sectional analysis from childhood to adulthood in the 1958 British cohort. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29 (10): 1212-21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kaur H, Choi WS, Mayo MS, Harris KJ: Duration of television watching is associated with increased body mass index. J Pediatr. 2003, 143 (4): 506-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Gillman MW, Colditz GA: One-year changes in activity and in inactivity among 10- to 15-year-old boys and girls: relationship to change in body mass index. Pediatrics. 2003, 111 (4): 836-43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bhargava A, Jolliffe D, Howard LL: Socio-economic, behavioural and environmental factors predicted body weights and household food insecurity scores in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten. Br J Nutr. 2008, 100 (2): 438-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chen JL, Wall D, Kennedy C, Unnithan V, Yeh CH: Predictors of increased body mass index in Chinese children. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007, 22 (3): 138-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Elgar FJ, Roberts C, Moore L, Tudor-Smith C: Sedentary behaviour, physical activity and weight problems in adolescents in Wales. Public Health. 2005, 119 (6): 518-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hesketh K, Wake M, Graham M, Waters E: Stability of television viewing and electronic game/computer use in a prospective cohort study of Australian children: Relationship with body mass index. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007, 4 (60).Google Scholar
Lajunen HR, Keski-Rahkonen A, Pulkkinen L, Rose RJ, Rissanen A, Kaprio J: Leisure activity patterns and their associations with overweight: a prospective study among adolescents. J Adolesc. 2009, 32 (5): 1089-103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jago R, Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, Thompson D, Greaves KA: BMI from 3-6 y of age is predicted by TV viewing and physical activity, not diet. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29 (6): 557-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Aires L, Andersen LB, Mendonca D, Martins C, Silva G, Mota J: A 3-year longitudinal analysis of changes in fitness, physical activity, fatness and screen time. Acta Paediatr. 2010, 99 (1): 140-4. Erratum in: Acta Paediatr. 2010, 99 (1):153Google Scholar
Fulton JE, Dai S, Steffen LM, Grunbaum JA, Shah SM, Labarthe DR: Physical activity, energy intake, sedentary behavior, and adiposity in youth. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 37 (Suppl 1): S40-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Day RS, Fulton JE, Dai S, Mihalopoulos NL, Barradas DT: Nutrient intake, physical activity, and CVD risk factors in children: Project HeartBeat!. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 37 (1 Suppl): S25-S33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Borradaile KE, Foster GD, May H, Karpyn A, Sherman S, Grundy K, Nachmani J, Vander Veur S, Boruch RF: Associations between the Youth/Adolescent Questionnaire, the Youth/Adolescent Activity Questionnaire, and body mass index z score in low-income inner-city fourth through sixth grade children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87 (6): 1650-5.Google Scholar
Must A, Bandini LG, Tybor DJ, Phillips SM, Naumova EN, Dietz WH: Activity, inactivity, and screen time in relation to weight and fatness over adolescence in girls. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (7): 1774-81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Poulton R: Association between child and adolescent television viewing and adult health: a longitudinal birth cohort study. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9430): 257-62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Maffeis C, Talamini G, Tato L: Influence of diet, physical activity and parents' obesity on children's adiposity: a four-year longitudinal study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998, 22 (8): 758-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Gillman MW, Frazier AL, Camargu CA, Colditz GA: Activity, dietary intake, and weight changes in a longitudinal study of preadolescent and adolescent boys and girls. Pediatrics. 2000, 105 (4): E56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sun Y, Sekine M, Kagamimori S: Lifestyle and overweight among Japanese adolescents: the Toyama Birth Cohort Study. J Epidemiol. 2009, 19 (6): 303-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lajous M, Chavarro J, Peterson KE, Hernandez-Prado B, Cruz-Valdez A, Hernandez-Avila M, Lazcano-Ponce E: Screen time and adiposity in adolescents in Mexico. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12 (10): 1938-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nagel G, Wabitsch M, Galm C, Berg S, Brandstetter S, Fritz M, Klenk J, Peter R, Prokopchuk D, Steiner R, Stroth S, Wartha O, Weiland SK, Steinacker J: Determinants of obesity in the Ulm Research on Metabolism, Exercise and Lifestyle in Children (URMEL-ICE). Eur J Pediatr. 2009, 168 (10): 1259-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern M, Sargent JD, Hanewinkel R: Relation between socioeconomic status and body mass index: evidence of an indirect path via television use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009, 163 (8): 731-8.Google Scholar
Christoforidis A, Papadopoulou E, Dimitriadou M, Stilpnopoulou D, Gkogka C, Katzus G, Thanassiou-Metaxa M: Reference values for quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of radius and tibia in healthy Greek pediatric population: clinical correlations. J Clin Densitom. 2009, 12 (3): 360-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bukara-Radujkovic G, Zdravkovic D, Bukara-Radujkovic G, Zdravkovic D: Physical activity as an important determinant in developing childhood obesity. Med Pregl. 2009, 62 (3-4): 107-13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vader AM, Walters ST, Harris TR, Hoelscher DM: Television viewing and snacking behaviors of fourth- and eighth-grade schoolchildren in Texas. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009, 6 (3): A89.Google Scholar
Steffen LM, Dai S, Fulton JE, Labarthe DR: Overweight in children and adolescents associated with TV viewing and parental weight: Project HeartBeat!. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 37 (Suppl 1): S50-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Padez C, Mourao I, Moreira P, Rosado V: Long sleep duration and childhood overweight/obesity and body fat. Am J Human Biol. 2009, 21 (3): 371-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wong SL, Leatherdale ST: Association between sedentary behavior, physical activity, and obesity: inactivity among active kids. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009, 6 (1): A26.Google Scholar
Pratt C, Webber LS, Baggett CD, Ward D, Pate RR, Loham T, Lytle L, Elder JP: Sedentary activity and body composition of middle school girls: the trial of activity for adolescent girls. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008, 79 (4): 458-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tovar G, Poveda JG, Pinilla MI, Lobelo F: [Relationship between overweight, physical activity and physical fitness in school-aged boys in Bogota Colombia]. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2008, 58 (3): 265-73. SpanishGoogle Scholar
Anderson SE, Economos CD, Must A: Active play and screen time in US children aged 4 to 11 years in relation to sociodemographic and weight status characteristics: a nationally representative cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 366.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Boone-Heinonen J, Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS: Obesogenic clusters: multidimensional adolescent obesity-related behaviors in the U.S. Ann Behav Med. 2008, 36 (3): 217-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Beyerlein A, Fahrmeir L, Mansmann U, Toschke AM: Alternative regression models to assess increase in childhood BMI. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008, 8: 59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Singh GK, Kogan MD, Van Dyck PC, Siahpush M: Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and behavioral determinants of childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: analyzing independent and joint associations. Ann Epidemiol. 2008, 18 (9): 682-95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Laurson KR, Eisenmann JC, Welk GJ, Wickel EE, Gentile DA, Walsh DA: Combined influence of physical activity and screen time recommendations on childhood overweight. J Pediatr. 2008, 153 (2): 209-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wells JC, Hallal PC, Reichert FF, Menezes AM, Araujo CL, Victora CG: Sleep patterns and television viewing in relation to obesity and blood pressure: evidence from an adolescent Brazilian birth cohort. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008, 32 (7): 1042-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Basaldua N, Chiquete E, Basaldua N, Chiquete E: Common predictors of excessive adiposity in children from a region with high prevalence of overweight. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008, 52 (3): 227-32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vicente-Rodriguez G, Rey-Lopez JP, Martin-Matillas M, Moreno LA, Warnberg J, Redondo C, Tercedor P, Delgado M, Marcos A, Castillo M, Bueno M, AVENA Study Group: Television watching, videogames, and excess of body fat in Spanish adolescents: The AVENA study. Nutrition. 2008, 24 (7-8): 654-62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Leatherdale ST, Wong SL: Modifiable characteristics associated with sedentary behaviours among youth. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3 (2): 93-101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Toschke AM, Von KR, Beyerlein A, Ruckinger S: Risk factors for childhood obesity: shift of the entire BMI distribution vs. shift of the upper tail only in a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann JC, Bartee RT, Smith DT, Welk GJ, Fu Q: Combined influence of physical activity and television viewing on the risk of overweight in US youth. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008, 32 (4): 613-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Maffeis C, Grezzani A, Perrone L, Del Giudice EM, Saggese G, Tato L: Could the savory taste of snacks be a further risk factor for overweight in children?. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008, 46 (4): 429-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chen MY, Liou YM, Wu JY: The relationship between TV/computer time and adolescents' health-promoting behavior: a secondary data analysis. J Nurs Res. 2008, 16 (1): 75-85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lasserre AM, Chiolero A, Cachat F, Paccaud F, Bovet P: Overweight in Swiss children and associations with children's and parents' characteristics. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (12): 2912-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kuriyan R, Bhat S, Thomas T, Vaz M, Kurpad AV: Television viewing and sleep are associated with overweight among urban and semi-urban South Indian children. Nutr J. 2007, 6: 25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lutfiyya MN, Lipsky MS, Wisdom-Behounek J, Inpanbutr-Martinkus M: Is rural residency a risk factor for overweight and obesity for U.S. children?. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (9): 2348-56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Butte NF, Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Zakeri I: Physical activity in nonoverweight and overweight Hispanic children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007, 39 (8): 1257-66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wang Y, Liang H, Tussing L, Braunschweig C, Caballero B, Flay B: Obesity and related risk factors among low socio-economic status minority students in Chicago. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10 (9): 927-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Toschke AM, Ruckinger S, Bohler E, Von KR: Adjusted population attributable fractions and preventable potential of risk factors for childhood obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10 (9): 902-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ortega FB, Tresaco B, Ruiz JR, Moreno LA, Martin-Matillas M, Mesa JL, Warnberg J, Bueno M, Tercedor P, Gutierrez A, Castillo MJ, AVENA Study Group: Cardiorespiratory fitness and sedentary activities are associated with adiposity in adolescents. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (6): 1589-99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bellisle F, Rolland-Cachera MF, Kellogg Scientific Advisory Committee: Three consecutive (1993, 1995, 1997) surveys of food intake, nutritional attitudes and knowledge, and lifestyle in 1000 French children, aged 9-11 years. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007, 20 (3): 241-51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Spinks AB, Macpherson AK, Bain C, McClure RJ: Compliance with the Australian national physical activity guidelines for children: relationship to overweight status. J Sci Med Sport. 2007, 10 (3): 156-63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Delva J, O'Malley PM, Johnston LD: Health-related behaviors and overweight: a study of Latino adolescents in the United States of America. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007, 21 (1): 11-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ramos E, Barros H: Family and school determinants of overweight in 13-year-old Portuguese adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2007, 96 (2): 281-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lioret S, Maire B, Volatier JL, Charles MA: Child overweight in France and its relationship with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and socioeconomic status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007, 61 (4): 509-16.Google Scholar
Lajunen HR, Keski-Rahkonen A, Pulkkinen L, Rose RJ, Rissanen A, Kaprio J: Are computer and cell phone use associated with body mass index and overweight? A population study among twin adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
te Velde SJ, De B, Thorsdottir I, Rasmussen M, Hagstromer M, Klepp KI, Brug J: Patterns in sedentary and exercise behaviors and associations with overweight in 9-14-year-old boys and girls--a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Boutelle KN, Hannan PJ, Neumark-Sztainer D, Himes JH: Identification and correlates of weight loss in adolescents in a national sample. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (2): 473-82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Carvalhal MM, Padez MC, Moreira PA, Rosado VM: Overweight and obesity related to activities in Portuguese children, 7-9 years. Eur J Public Health. 2007, 17 (1): 42-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zabinski MF, Norman GJ, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Patrick K: Patterns of sedentary behavior among adolescents. Health Psychol. 2007, 26 (1): 113-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hardy LL, Dobbins T, Booth ML, ney-Wilson E, Okely AD: Sedentary behaviours among Australian adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006, 30 (6): 534-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ekelund U, Brage S, Froberg K, Harro M, Anderssen SA, Sardinha LB, Riddoch C, Andersen LB: TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: the European Youth Heart Study. PLoS Med. 2006, 3 (12): e488.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Moraes SA, Beltran RJ, Mondini L, Freitas IC: [Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and associated factors in school children from urban area in Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico, 2004]. Cad Saude Publica. 2006, 22 (6): 1289-301. PortugueseView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Salmon J, Campbell KJ, Crawford DA: Television viewing habits associated with obesity risk factors: a survey of Melbourne schoolchildren. Med J Aust. 2006, 184 (2): 64-7.Google Scholar
Violante R, del Rio Navarro BE, Berber A, Ramirez CN, Baeza BM, Sienra Monge JJ: Obesity risk factors in the ISAAC (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood) in Mexico City. Rev Alerg Mex. 2005, 52 (4): 141-5.Google Scholar
Rapp K, Schick KH, Bode H, Weiland SK: Type of kindergarten and other potential determinants of overweight in pre-school children. Public Health Nutr. 2005, 8 (6): 642-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kautiainen S, Koivusilta L, Lintonen T, Virtanen SM, Rimpela A: Use of information and communication technology and prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29 (8): 925-33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Giammattei J, Blix G, Marshak HH, Wollitzer AO, Pettitt DJ: Television watching and soft drink consumption: associations with obesity in 11- to 13-year-old schoolchildren. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003, 157 (9): 882-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ruangdaraganon N, Kotchabhakdi N, Udomsubpayakul U, Kunanusont C, Suriyawongpaisal P: The association between television viewing and childhood obesity: a national survey in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002, 85 (Suppl 4): S1075-80.Google Scholar
Andersen RE, Crespo CJ, Bartlett SJ, Cheskin LJ, Pratt M: Relationship of physical activity and television watching with body weight and level of fatness among children: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 1998, 279 (12): 938-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gortmaker SL, Must A, Sobol AM, Peterson K, Colditz GA, Dietx WH: Television viewing as a cause of increasing obesity among children in the United States, 1986-1990. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996, 150 (4): 356-62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hirschler V, Buzzano K, Erviti A, Ismael N, Silva S, Dalamon R: Overweight and lifestyle behaviors of low socioeconomic elementary school children in Buenos Aires. BMC Pediatrics. 2009, 9 (1).Google Scholar
Tsai H-J, Tsai AC: The association of BMI and sedentary time with respiratory symptoms and asthma in 5th grade schoolchildren in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J Asthma. 2009, 46 (1): 9-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Trang NHHD, Hong TK, Dibley MJ, Sibbritt DW: Factors associated with physical inactivity in adolescents in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009, 41 (7): 1374-83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Russ SA, Larson K, Franke TM, Halfon N: Associations between media use and health in US children. Acad Pediatr. 2009, 9 (5): 300-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nawal LM, Garcia R, Dankwa CM, Young T, Lipsky MS: Overweight and obese prevalence rates in African American and Hispanic children: An analysis of data from the 2003-2004 National Survey of Children's Health. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008, 21 (3): 191-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Collins AE, Pakiz B, Rock CL: Factors associated with obesity in Indonesian adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3 (1): 58-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gomez LF, Parra DC, Lobelo F, Samper B, Moreno J, Jacoby E, Lucumi DI, Matsudo S, Borda C: Television viewing and its association with overweight in Colombian children: Results from the 2005 National Nutrition Survey: A cross sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007, 4 (41).Google Scholar
Barlow SE, Chang J-J: Is parental aggravation associated with childhood overweight? An analysis of the national survey of children's health 2003. Acta Paediatrica. 2007, 96 (9): 1360-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Utter J, Scragg R, Schaaf D, Fitzgerald E, Wilson N: Correlates of body mass index among a nationally representative sample of New Zealand children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007, 2 (2): 104-13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tsai H-J, Tsai AC, Nriagu J, Ghosh D, Gong M, Sandretto A: Associations of BMI, TV-watching time, and physical activity on respiratory symptoms and asthma in 5th grade schoolchildren in Taipei, Taiwan. J Asthma. 2007, 44 (5): 397-401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chaput J-P, Brunet M, Tremblay A: Relationship between short sleeping hours and childhood overweight/obesity: Results from the 'Quebec en Forme' project. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006, 30 (7): 1080-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Andersen LF, Lillegaard ITL, Overby N, Lytle L, Klepp K-I, Johansson L: Overweight and obesity among Norwegian schoolchildren: Changes from 1993 to 2000. Scand J Public Health. 2005, 33 (2): 99-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gibson S, Lambert J, Neate D: Associations between weight status, physical activity, and consumption of biscuits, cakes and confectionery among young people in Britain. Nutrition Bulletin. 2004, 29 (4): 301-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Da CR, Taddei JAAC, Colugnatti F: Obesity among children attending elementary public schools in Sao Paulo, Brazil: A case-control study. Public Health Nutr. 2003, 6 (7): 659-63.Google Scholar
Taylor WC, Sallis JF, Dowda M, Freedson PS, Eason K, Pate RR: Activity patterns and correlates among youth: Differences by weight status. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002, 14 (4): 418-31.Google Scholar
van Zutphen M, Bell AC, Kremer PJ, Swinburn BA: Association between the family environment and television viewing in Australian children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007, 43 (6): 458-63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lagiou A, Parava M: Correlates of childhood obesity in Athens, Greece. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11 (9): 940-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Smith BJ, Phongsavan P, Havea D, Halavatau V, Chey T: Body mass index, physical activity and dietary behaviours among adolescents in the Kingdom of Tonga. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10 (2): 137-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shields M: Overweight and obesity among children and youth. Health Rep. 2006, 17 (3): 27-42. Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 82-003Google Scholar
Aucote HM, Cooper A: Relationships between body fatness, small-screen sedentary activity and regionality among schoolchildren in Victoria, Australia. Aust J Rural Health. 2009, 17 (3): 141-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Boone JE, Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Popkin BM: Screen time and physical activity during adolescence: Longitudinal effects on obesity in young adulthood. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007, 4 (26).Google Scholar
Klein-Platat C, Oujaa M, Wagner A, Haan MC, Arveiler D, Schlienger JL, Simon C: Physical activity is inversely related to waist circumference in 12-y-old French adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29 (1): 9-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, King MA, Pickett W: Overweight and obesity in Canadian adolescents and their associations with dietary habits and physical activity patterns. J Adolesc Health. 2004, 35 (5): 360-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Graf C, Koch B, Dordel S, Schindler-Marlow S, Icks A, Schuller A, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Tokarski W, Predel HG: Physical activity, leisure habits and obesity in first-grade children. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004, 11 (4): 284-90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Stettler N, Signer TM, Suter PM: Electronic games and environmental factors associated with childhood obesity in Switzerland. Obes Res. 2004, 12 (6): 896-903.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Patrick K, Norman GJ, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF, Zabinski MF: Diet, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors as risk factors for overweight in adolescence. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004, 158 (4): 385-90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vandewater EA, Shim MS, Caplovitz AG: Linking obesity and activity level with children's television and video game use. J Adolesc. 2004, 27 (1): 71-85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Utter J, Neumark-Sztainer D, Jeffery R, Story M: Couch potatoes or french fries: are sedentary behaviors associated with body mass index, physical activity, and dietary behaviors among adolescents?. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003, 103 (10): 1298-305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tremblay MS, Willms JD: Is the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic related to physical inactivity?. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003, 27 (9): 1100-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lowry R, Wechsler H, Galuska DA, Fulton JE, Kann L: Television viewing and its associations with overweight, sedentary lifestyle, and insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables among US high school students: differences by race, ethnicity, and gender. J Sch Health. 2002, 72 (10): 413-21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Janz KF, Levy SM, Burns TL, Torner JC, Willing MC, Warren JJ: Fatness, physical activity, and television viewing in children during the adiposity rebound period: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Prev Med. 2002, 35 (6): 563-71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann JC, Bartee RT, Wang MQ: Physical activity, TV viewing, and weight in U.S. youth: 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Obes Res. 2002, 10 (5): 379-85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Popkin BM: Ethnic differences in physical activity and inactivity patterns and overweight status. Obes Res. 2002, 10 (3): 141-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Crespo CJ, Smit E, Troiano RP, Bartlett SJ, Macera CA, Anderson RE: Television watching, energy intake, and obesity in US children: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001, 155 (3): 360-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hernandez B, Gortmaker SL, Colditz GA, Peterson KE, Laird NM, Parra-Cabrera S: Association of obesity with physical activity, television programs and other forms of video viewing among children in Mexico city. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999, 23 (8): 845-54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Muller MJ, Koertzinger I, Mast M, Langnase K, Grund A: Physical activity and diet in 5 to 7 years old children. Public Health Nutr. 1999, 2 (3A): 443-4. Erratum in: Public Health Nutr. 2000;3(1):443-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Obarzanek E, Schreiber GB, Crawford PB, Goldman SR, Barrier PM, Frederick MM, Lakatos E: Energy intake and physical activity in relation to indexes of body fat: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994, 60 (1): 15-22.Google Scholar
Dietz WH, Gortmaker SL: Do we fatten our children at the television set? Obesity and television viewing in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1985, 75 (5): 807-12.Google Scholar
da Silva RC, Malina RM: [Level of physical activity in adolescents from Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil]. Cad Saude Publica. 2000, 16 (4): 1091-7. PortugueseView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Asante PA, Cox J, Sonneville K, Samuels RC, Taveras EM: Overweight prevention in pediatric primary care: a needs assessment of an urban racial/ethnic minority population. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009, 48 (8): 837-43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Katzmarzyk PT, Malina RM, Song TM, Bouchard C: Television viewing, physical activity, and health-related fitness of youth in the Quebec Family Study. J Adolesc Health. 1998, 23 (5): 318-25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Purath J, Lansinger T, Ragheb C: Cardiac risk evaluation for elementary school children. Public Health Nurs. 1995, 12 (3): 189-95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wake M, Hesketh K, Waters E: Television, computer use and body mass index in Australian primary school children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003, 39 (2): 130-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
McMurray RG, Harrell JS, Deng S, Bradley CB, Cox LM, Bandiwala SI: The influence of physical activity, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity on the weight status of adolescents. Obes Res. 2000, 8 (2): 130-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Forshee RA, Anderson PA, Storey ML: Associations of various family characteristics and time use with children's body mass index. J Community Health Nurs. 2009, 26 (2): 77-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Thompson AM, Campagna PD, Durant M, Murphy RJ, Rehman LA, Wadsworth SA: Are overweight students in Grades 3, 7, and 11 less physically active than their healthy weight counterparts?. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009, 4 (1): 28-35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hume C, Singh A, Brug J, Mechelen W, Chinapaw M: Dose-response associations between screen time and overweight among youth. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009, 4 (1): 61-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Alves JG, Siqueira PP, Figueiroa JN: Overweight and physical inactivity in children living in favelas in the metropolitan region of Recife, Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2009, 85 (1): 67-71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Al SH, Vereecken C, Abdeen Z, Coats E, Maes L: Associations of overweight and of weight dissatisfaction among Palestinian adolescents: findings from the national study of Palestinian schoolchildren. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009, 22 (1): 40-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mihas C, Mariolis A, Manios Y, Naska A, Panagiotakos D, Arapaki A, Alevizos A, Mariolis-Sapsakos T, Tountas Y: Overweight/obesity and factors associated with body mass index during adolescence: the VYRONAS study. Acta Paediatr. 2009, 98 (3): 495-500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mikolajczyk RT, Richter M: Associations of behavioural, psychosocial and socioeconomic factors with over- and underweight among German adolescents. Int J Public Health. 2008, 53 (4): 214-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Islam-Zwart K, Cawston A: Investigation of factors contributing to diabetes risk in American Indian/Alaska native youth. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2008, 14 (3): 49-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kosti RI, Panagiotakos DB, Mihas CC, Alevizos A, Zampelas A, Mariolis A, Tountas Y: Dietary habits, physical activity and prevalence of overweight/obesity among adolescents in Greece: the Vyronas study. Med Sci Monit. 2007, 13 (10): CR437-CR444.Google Scholar
Katzmarzyk PT, Malina RM, Song TM, Bouchard C: Physical activity and health-related fitness in youth: a multivariate analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30 (5): 709-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vaughan C, Kilkkinen A, Heistaro S, Laatikainen T, Dunbar J: The dietary, physical activity and sedentary behaviours of Victorian regional secondary school students. Aust J Prim Health. 2007, 13 (1): 81-8.Google Scholar
Mota J, Ribeiro J, Santos MP, Gomes H: Obesity, physical activity, computer use, and TV viewing in Portuguese adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2006, 18 (1): 113-21.Google Scholar
Colwell J, Kato M: Investigation of the relationship between social isolation, self-esteem, aggression and computer game play in Japanese adolescents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2003, 6 (2): Aug-158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Forshee RA, Anderson PA, Storey ML: The role of beverage consumption, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and demographics on body mass index of adolescents. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2004, 55 (6): 463-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Waller CE, Du S, Popkin BM: Patterns of overweight, inactivity, and snacking in Chinese children. Obes Res. 2003, 11 (8): 957-61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wolf AM, Gortmaker SL, Cheung L, Gray HM, Herzog DB, Colditz GA: Activity, inactivity, and obesity: racial, ethnic, and age differences among schoolgirls. Am J Public Health. 1993, 83 (11): 1625-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Robinson TN, Hammer LD, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Hayward C, Taylor CB: Does television viewing increase obesity and reduce physical activity? Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses among adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 1993, 91 (2): 273-80.Google Scholar
Wosje KS, Khoury PR, Claytor RP, Copeland KA, Kalkwarf HJ, Daniels SR: Adiposity and TV viewing are related to less bone accrual in young children. J Pediatr. 2009, 154 (1): 79-85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tucker LA: The relationship of television viewing to physical fitness and obesity. Adolescence. 1986, 21 (84): 797-806.Google Scholar
Albarwani S, Al-Hashmi K, Al-Abri M, Jaju D, Hassan MO: Effects of overweight and leisure-time activities on aerobic fitness in urban and rural adolescents. Metab. 2009, 7 (4): 369-74.Google Scholar
Lobelo F, Dowda M, Pfeiffer KA, Pate RR: Electronic media exposure and its association with activity-related outcomes in female adolescents: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. J Phys Act Health. 2009, 6 (2): 137-43.Google Scholar
Hardy LL, Dobbins TA, ney-Wilson EA, Okely AD, Booth ML: Sedentariness, small-screen recreation, and fitness in youth. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 36 (2): 120-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pate RR, Wang CY, Dowda M, Farrell SW, O'Neill JR: Cardiorespiratory fitness levels among US youth 12 to 19 years of age: findings from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006, 160 (10): 1005-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dollman J, Ridley K: Differences in body fatness, fat patterning and cardio-respiratory fitness between groups of Australian children formed on the basis of physical activity and television viewing guidelines. J Phys Act Health. 2006, 3 (2): 191-199.Google Scholar
Armstrong CA, Sallis JF, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, McKenzie TL, Hovell MF: Children's television viewing, body fat, and physical fitness. Am J Health Promot. 1998, 12 (6): 363-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tucker LA, Hager RL, Tucker LA, Hager RL: Television viewing and muscular fitness of children. Percept Mot Skills. 1996, 82 (3 Pt 2): 1316-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta K, O'Loughlin J, Chen S, Karp I, Paradis G, Tremblay J, Hamet P, Pilote L: Emergence of sex differences in prevalence of high systolic blood pressure: analysis of a longitudinal adolescent cohort. Circulation. 2006, 114 (24): 2663-70. Erratum in: Circulation 2007, 116 (9):e319View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta K: Sex differences in the development of higher systolic blood pressure during adolescence. Cardiology Review. 2008, 25 (5): 54-7.Google Scholar
Aman J, Skinner TC, de Beaufort CE, Swift PG, Aanstoot HJ, Cameron F, Hvidoere Study Group on Childhood Diabetes: Associations between physical activity, sedentary behavior, and glycemic control in a large cohort of adolescents with type 1 diabetes: the Hvidoere Study Group on Childhood Diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009, 10 (4): 234-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Overby NC, Margeirsdottir HD, Brunborg C, Anderssen SA, Andersen LF, hl-Jorgensen K, Norwegian Study Group for Childhood Diabetes: Physical activity and overweight in children and adolescents using intensified insulin treatment. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009, 10 (2): 135-41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mark AE, Janssen I: Relationship between screen time and metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008, 30 (2): 153-60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Robinson TN, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Matheson DM, Haskell WL, Pruitt LA, Powell TM, Owens AS, Thompson NS, Flint-Moore NM, Davis GJ, Emig KA, Brown RT, Rochon J, Green S, Varady A: Dance and reducing television viewing to prevent weight gain in African-American girls: the Stanford GEMS pilot study. Ethn Dis. 2003, 13 (Suppl 1): S65-77.Google Scholar
Holder MD, Coleman B, Sehn ZL, Holder MD, Coleman B, Sehn ZL: The contribution of active and passive leisure to children's well-being. J Health Psychol. 2009, 14 (3): 378-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jackson LA, Zhao Y, Witt EA, Fitzgerald HE, Von EA, Harold R: Self-concept, self-esteem, gender, race, and information technology use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009, 12 (4): 437-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Neumark-Sztainer D, Goeden C, Story M, Wall M: Associations between body satisfaction and physical activity in adolescents: Implications for programs aimed at preventing a broad spectrum of weight-related disorders. Eating Disorders. 2004, 12 (2): 125-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dominick JR: Videogames, television violence, and aggression in teenagers. J Commun. 1984, 34 (2): 136-47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ohannessian CM: Media use and adolescent psychological adjustment: An examination of gender differences. J Child Fam Stud. 2009, 18 (5): 583-93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wiggins JD: Self-esteem, earned grades, and television viewing habits of students. School Counselor. 1987, 35 (2): 128-133.Google Scholar
Gortmaker SL, Salter CA, Walker DK, Dietz WH: The impact of television viewing on mental aptitude and achievement: A longitudinal study. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1990, 54 (4): Win-604.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mistry KB, Minkovitz CS, Strobino DM, Borzekowski DL: Children's television exposure and behavioral and social outcomes at 5.5 years: does timing of exposure matter?. Pediatrics. 2007, 120 (4): 762-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kuntsche E, Pickett W, Overpeck M, Craig W, Boyce W, de Matos MG: Television viewing and forms of bullying among adolescents from eight countries. J Adolesc Health. 2006, 39 (6): 908-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ussher MH, Owen CG, Cook DG, Whincup PH: The relationship between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and psychological wellbeing among adolescents. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007, 42 (10): 851-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chowhan J, Stewart JM: Television and the behaviour of adolescents: does socio-economic status moderate the link?. Soc Sci Med. 2007, 65 (7): 1324-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nelson MC, Gordon-Larsen P: Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns are associated with selected adolescent health risk behaviors. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (4): 1281-90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Page RM, Zarco EP: Relationship between television viewing frequency and scores on shyness among Philippine high school students. Psychol Rep. 2001, 89 (2): 366-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Brodersen NH, Steptoe A, Williamson S, Wardle J: Sociodemographic, developmental, environmental, and psychological correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior at age 11 to 12. Ann Behav Med. 2005, 29 (1): 2-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto A: Video game use and the development of sociocognitive abilities in children: Three surveys of elementary school students. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1994, 24 (1): 21-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ennemoser M, Schneider W: Relations of television viewing and reading: Findings from a 4-year longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol. 2007, 99 (2): 349-68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lonner WJ, Thorndike RM, Forbes NE, Ashworth C: The influence of television on measured cognitive abilities: A study with Native Alaskan children. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1985, 16 (3): 355-80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shin N: Exploring pathways from television viewing to academic achievement in school age children. J Genet Psychol. 2004, 165 (4): 367-81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
nastassea-Vlachou K, Fryssira-Kanioura H, Papathanasiou-Klontza D, Xipolita-Zachariadi A, Matsaniotis N: The effects of television viewing in Greece, and the role of the paediatrician: a familiar triangle revisited. Eur J Pediatr. 1996, 155 (12): 1057-60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jaruratanasirikul S, Wongwaitaweewong K, Sangsupawanich P: Electronic game play and school performance of adolescents in southern Thailand. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009, 12 (5): 509-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kovacs FM, Del Real MTG, Gestoso M, Lopez J, Mufraggi N, Palou P: Relació entre hàbits de vida i qualificacions escolars en adolescents. Apunts Medicina de l'Esport. 2008, 43 (160): 181-8. SpanishView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kristjansson AL, Sigfusdottir ID, Allegrante JP, Helgason AR: Adolescent health behavior, contentment in school, and academic achievement. Am J Health Behav. 2009, 33 (1): 69-79.Google Scholar
Sharif I, Sargent JD: Association between television, movie, and video game exposure and school performance. Pediatrics. 2006, 118 (4): 1061-70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Caldas SJ, Bankston CI: Black and white TV: Race, television viewing and academic achievement. Sociological Spectrum. 1999, 19 (1): 39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shejwal B: Television viewing of higher secondary students: Does it affect their academic achievement and mathematical reasoning?. Psychol Dev Soc J. 2006, 18 (2): 201-13.Google Scholar
Cooper H, Valentine JC, Nye B, Lindsay JJ: Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. J Educ Psychol. 1999, 91 (2): 369-78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Welch WW, Walberg HJ, Fraser BJ: Predicting elementary science learning using national assessment data. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1986, 23 (8): 699-706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fetler M: Television viewing and school achievement. J Commun. 1984, 34 (2): 104-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Roberts DF, Bachen CM, Hornby MC, Hernandez-Ramos P: Reading and television: Predictors of reading achievement at different age levels. Communication Research. 1984, 11 (1): 9-49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Walberg HJ, Tsai Sl: Reading achievement and diminishing returns to time. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1984, 76 (3): 442-51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ridley-Johnson R, Cooper H, Chance J: The relation of children's television viewing to school achievement and I.Q. J Educ Res. 1983, 76 (5): 294-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Walberg HJ, Weinstein T: The production of achievement and attitude in high school social studies. J Educ Res. 1982, 75 (5): 285-93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Scott LF: Relationships between elementary school children and television. J Educ Res. 1958, 52: 134-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dumais SA: Cohort and gender differences in extracurricular participation: The relationship between activities, math achievement, and college expectations. Sociol Spectr. 2009, 29 (1): 72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Keith TZ, Reimers TM, Fehrmann PG, Pottebaum SM, Aubey LW: Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. J Edul Psychol. 1986, 78 (5): 373-80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gaddy GD: Television's impact on high school achievement. Public Opin Q. 1986, 50 (3): 340-59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Skoric MM, Teo LL, Neo RL: Children and video games: addiction, engagement, and scholastic achievement. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009, 12 (5): 567-72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jackson LA, Zhao Y, Kolenic A, Fitzgerald HE, Harold R, Von EA: Race, gender, and information technology use: the new digital divide. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008, 11 (4): 437-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sharif I, Wills TA, Sargent JD: Effect of visual media use on school performance: A prospective study. J Adolesc Health. 2010, 46 (1): 52-61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
van Schie EG: Children and videogames: Leisure activities, aggression, social integration, and school performance. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1997, 27 (13): 1175-94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hughes AR, Stewart L, Chapple J, McColl JH, Donaldson MD, Kelnar CJ, Zabihollah M, Ahmed F, Reilly JJ: Randomized, controlled trial of a best-practice individualized behavioral program for treatment of childhood overweight: Scottish Childhood Overweight Treatment Trial (SCOTT). Pediatrics. 2008, 121 (3): e539-e546.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shelton D, Le GK, Norton L, Stanton-Cook S, Morgan J, Masterman P: Randomized controlled trial: A parent-based group education program for overweight children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007, 43 (12): 799-805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Goldfield GS, Mallory R, Parker T, Cunningham T, Legg C, Lumb A, Parker K, Prud'homme D, Adamo KB: Effects of open-loop feedback on physical activity and television viewing in overweight and obese children: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006, 118 (1): e157-e166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Epstein LH, Valoski AM, Vara LS, McCurley J, Wisniewski L, Kalarchian MA, Klein KR, Shrager LR: Effects of decreasing sedentary behavior and increasing activity on weight change in obese children. Health Psychol. 1995, 14 (2): 109-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Janssen I, Kho ME, Hicks A, Murumets K: Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011, 36 (1): 59-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kho ME, Eva KW, Cook DJ, Brouwers MC: The Completeness of Reporting (CORE) index identifies important deficiencies in observational study conference abstracts. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008, 61 (12): 1241-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L: Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006, 59 (7): 681-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc AG, Janssen I: Difference between self-reported and accelerometer measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in youth. Pediatr Exer Sci. 2010, 223-34. 22Google Scholar
Adamo KB, Prince SA, Tricco AC, Connor-Gorber S, Tremblay MS: A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009, 4 (1): 2-27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Biddiss E, Irwin J: Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010, 164 (7): 664-72.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
